c. 2006 Religion News Service

(UNDATED) At first, the only thing setting the earliest baby boomers apart was their sheer number.

They acted much like their parents’ generation when it came to life’s milestones. By age 20, nearly half of the first wave of boomers were married. Once married, they started having children.

The similarity ended there.

Now, as the boomers born in 1946 reach age 60, they have experienced more family disruption than their parents could have imagined. Love has been a bumpy journey.

As a result, they head into their senior years far more likely to be divorced, remarried, cohabiting or living alone. Demographers warn such disruption could leave this generation with weaker family ties, making them more vulnerable as they age and need help.

“Many of these ties are going to be frail,” says Mary Elizabeth Hughes, a Duke University sociologist who has studied the boomers. “They don’t have the glue that previous ties did.”

While every generation has seen some of its members divorce, remarry or live alone, those numbers are all bigger for the group Hughes calls the “early boomers,” those born from 1946 to 1955.

Consider Jim and Claudia Burns of Whippany, N.J. These two “class of ’46” boomers have five marriages between them. She’s on her third; he’s on his second.

Claudia isn’t exactly proud of her two previous divorces, but she isn’t ashamed of them, either. “I have a theory,” she says philosophically. “I believe I needed a different husband for each stage of my life. I feel like there was a reason for each person.”

As she and Jim approach their third wedding anniversary this month (June), she says emphatically: “This time is it. We just know it.”

Sociologist Hughes says of the 1946-55 babies, “We’re rewriting the books here”:

_ They are twice as likely to live alone as their parents’ generation. While the percentage is not huge _ just 11 percent _ it reflects a striking break with the past.

Hughes is quick to say she doesn’t equate living alone with being lonely, or being without support. “You could be living alone but you could have tons of friends filling the gap. Living alone is only one piece of the puzzle _ a huge piece. But other social connections matter, too,” she says. “When living alone becomes a problem is if you need help.”

_ By age 40, a third of early boomer women were divorced. By contrast, only 13 percent of their parents’ generation were divorced by that age.

It is a myth, however, that early boomers began the divorce revolution. Their older siblings, the War Babies of 1936-45, were the generation that actually led the upsurge in divorce. But early boomers then went on to surpass them. (And their rate was topped in turn by the younger boomers, those born 1956-64.)

Many of those divorced boomers remarried _ but not all. “Remarriage rates for them are on the high side, but not high enough to compensate for all the divorces,” Hughes says.

_ Raised to look on cohabitation as “shacking up,” early boomers nonetheless came to adopt living together as an acceptable way to form a family. Even in middle age, 4 percent were living with non-relatives; the figure was a paltry 1 percent for their parents.

“It simply wasn’t in people’s repertoire,” Hughes says. “Now, however, people view it as an option.” With the children grown, couples no longer need marriage to confer legitimacy on their offspring, and they may well want to remain single to protect pension benefits or inheritances. (An unknown amount of the cohabiting reflects gay relationships.)

By far the most common living arrangement for those turning 60 this year is the traditional one: living with one’s spouse. In the 2000 Census, such a family configuration accounted for 61 percent of early boomer households _ an 11 percent drop from their parents at that same stage in life.

While some of those are second or even third marriages, many are couples still in first marriages and coming up on their 40th anniversaries.

The level of divorce experienced by the early boomers is worrisome, Hughes says, because marital status affects both health and wealth.

Married people live longer. The divorced are at greater risk for health problems, even after remarriage. Demographers call it divorce’s “health scar.” Finances take a big hit as well, as the family’s assets are spread over two households.

The concern is that such continued churning of family roles may make some extended families less likely to help once old age sets in.

Will adult children look after an elderly step-parent with the same devotion they would show a parent? If Mom remarries, then dies, will her children feel obliged to look after her second husband?

If the remarriage took place when the children were small, the resulting bonds may be as strong as blood ties, Hughes says. But if the remarriage happens after the kids have left the nest, what then?

In some divorces, the father ends up seeing far less of his children _ a problem that has always been viewed from the perspective of the needs of the child. But what about later in life, when the tables turn?

“We’re used to thinking about dads who abandon their kids,” Hughes says. “Well, when those guys are old, they’re not going to have their kids around to help.”

(Kathleen O’Brien is a staff writer for The Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J.)

KRE/RB END OBRIEN

Editors: To obtain photos of of Claudia and Jim Burns and a graphic showing generational shifts in lifestyle, go to the RNS Web site at https://religionnews.com. On the lower right, click on “photos,” then search by subject or slug.