Churches Pressure Travel Industry on Sex Trafficking

c. 2007 Religion News Service (UNDATED) Faith groups are using their collective influence and financial wherewithal to press the travel and hospitality industry to take greater steps to protect children from sex trafficking. Increasing numbers of church groups and other religious bodies say it’s not only a moral imperative to guard against sex trafficking, but […]

c. 2007 Religion News Service

(UNDATED) Faith groups are using their collective influence and financial wherewithal to press the travel and hospitality industry to take greater steps to protect children from sex trafficking.

Increasing numbers of church groups and other religious bodies say it’s not only a moral imperative to guard against sex trafficking, but also makes good business sense for hotels, airlines and cruise companies.


Last November, a Massachusetts investment firm, Boston Common Asset Management, used a shareholder resolution to convince the Marriott hotel empire to reshape its human rights policy with a new “protection of the rights of children” clause to raise awareness of the issue.

The Boston company is a member of the New York-based Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, and its success with Marriott prompted greater interest in what investors _ in this case, churches _ can do to end child sex tourism.

“Faith groups are saying that this is just so abhorrent we need to address it,” said the Rev. David M. Shilling, director of global corporate accountability for the ICCR. “The motivation is to try to redress the issue of (using) people for various commodities.”

According to the U.S. State Department, more than 1 million children worldwide are caught up in a global network of sex trafficking in which people travel to engage in paid sex acts with children.

The ICCR reviewed which faith groups hold stock in specific corporations. The Presbyterian Church (USA), for example, “stepped up” to engage Hilton Hotels, where it holds investments, on the issue, Schilling said.

Bill Somplatsky-Jarman, who monitors the Presbyterians’ $10 billion investment portfolio for the church’s Mission Responsibility through Investment Committee, said hotels can have an influence on the sex tourism industry.

“It would be one major piece in the chain of helping to raise awareness,” he said. “Having them on board creates a better climate to combat this sort of activity.”


Faith groups have been working with the New York-based ECPAT-USA, a nonprofit organization working to end child prostitution, child pornography and sex trafficking. It wants hotels to adopt its ECPAT code, which was developed in conjunction with the travel industry and the World Tourism Organization.

Signatories of that code agree to develop policies and implement training to detect and avoid involvement in child sex tourism. They are also required to report on their progress annually to shareholders.

Carol Smolenski, executive director of ECPAT-USA, said hotels play a critical role in fighting child exploitation because hotels are often the places where it occurs. She said this puts them “in a position to take a position” and to “address travelers.”

But, Smolenski said, most companies have been unwilling to completely sign on to the requirements of the code.

“They don’t sign because (they believe) it makes them more vulnerable to a lawsuit if something happens on their premises,” she said. “Signing it makes them more responsible.”

She argued, however, that signing the code would actually benefit a company in that sort of situation. “If something happened and you had signed, you’d be in a better place,” she said because it would help a hotel appear to be a “good guy company” that is trying to address the problem.


Last October, the Presbyterians requested a meeting with Hilton but got no response, Somplatsky-Jarman said. The hotel chain claimed the letter was lost and the church is now awaiting a reply. Last month, church leaders authorized the investments committee to continue pushing Hilton.

Louise C. Nelson, vice president of ethics and chief privacy officer at Hilton, said in a statement that the company doesn’t “currently have a U.S. policy on human rights.” Hilton’s corporate communications department declined to comment on the shareholders action.

Asked if the church would ever divest from Hilton if the company refused to adopt new policies, Somplatsky-Jarman said “it’s always a last resort” but pointed to a history of dialoguing with companies.

“The church is very committed to it,” he said. “But our experience is that we do 90 percent of our work through dialogue.”

The Presbyterians haven’t been alone in requesting attention from Hilton. Sister Valerie Heinonen, a consultant on corporate social responsibility for a number of religious bodies, including the Sisters of Mercy-Detroit, has been involved as well.

She said her office has set its priorities on the “growing phenomenon” of trafficking of women and children. Heinonen said her group has started a letter-writing campaign but so far has gotten no response.


Other faith groups, including the Episcopal Church and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, are in the early stages of similar work and plan to file joint resolutions with Starwood Hotels and Resorts.

KRE/RB END STEE

Donate to Support Independent Journalism!

Donate Now!