Pastordan wants his friends in the RIC to “explain why, despite all evidence to the contrary, they thought it was a good idea to mainstream Rick Warren as a “moderate Evangelical.” Brody, meanwhile, has got scads of pro-lifers raging at Warren for being willing to anoint a pro-choicer president. Obama, for his part, claims this is part and parcel of his campaign to get America to “come together” even when there’s disagreement about social issues. And Warren seems to be angling for Billy Graham’s title of America’s pastor without losing his social conservative voice. Which of the above are shrewd as serpents, which innocent as doves?