The NYT weighs in on OFANP in the usual, straight-ahead separationist way it has with church-state issues: no faith-based hiring discrimination. My admittedly anecdotal sense is that there is more ambient interest in/concern about Obama’s continuation of the Bush office than mainstream media coverage would lead you to suspect. (It would be interesting to see some polling data on the subject–hey Pew!). At any rate, the Times editorial cranks up the pressure on the administration to get more specific about what its principles and practices really will be.
Sooner rather than later
The NYT weighs in on OFANP in the usual, straight-ahead separationist way it has with church-state issues: no faith-based hiring discrimination. My admittedly anecdotal sense is that there is more ambient interest in/concern about Obama’s continuation of the Bush office than mainstream media coverage would lead you to suspect. (It would be interesting to see […]
