Is gay marriage like male lactation?

Print More

Active RNS subscribers and members can view this content by logging-in here.

San Francisco’s punchy new archbishop, Salvatore Cordileone, thinks Catholics should use the term “same-sex marriage” only “sparingly,” and added this analogy by way of explanation, as per Josh McElwee of the National Catholic Reporter: Speaking to the London-based Catholic Herald, Cordileone compares the term to male lactation. “Legislating for the right for people of the same sex […]

  • Hyhybt

    If anything, the analogy works against his side. We don’t generally bother having laws against the impossible.

  • Isis

    That is really painfully stupid. Male lactation is physically not possible barring some kind of medical issue, whereas two people of the same gender could have a civil marriage given the correct legislation. Religions do not have a monopoly on marriage currently…atheist heterosexuals can wed…in a civil marriage…but homosexuals cannot…??? There is no sense at all to the argument against gay marriage…it will not affect religions in the slightest, it has nothing to do with religion at all.

  • frequentwind

    Breastfed newborn boys actually can lactate due to the prenatal and breastfeeding transfer of hormones from mother to son. The readers of RNS will also be interested to know that this is sometimes referred to as “Witch’s Milk,” from the belief that witches stole breast milk from sleeping newborns to feed their familiars.

  • Mark Edwards

    The logic of the bishop’s argument is lost on me – is this an SAT question? The two situations have absolutely no connection, except that the bishops are against both, I suppose.

  • Pingback: Catholic bishops in France on gay marriage: neither 'oui' nor 'non' – (blog) | AnythingGospel News()

  • Verlie Levay

    Now I appreciate that any number of Christian people will object at this point with words like ‘abomination’ and ‘unnatural’ – claiming that the Bible teaches clearly that all homosexual activity (including that between consenting adults) is an obscenity before God. My contention at this point is simply that even if this were true it wouldn’t detract from the value of gay marriage. For the issue here is not whether homosexual activity is desirable or undesirable or morally offensive or anything of the sort.’`

    Stop by our new homepage too

  • Having read this I thought it was rather informative.

    I appreciate you finding the time and energy to put this short article together.

    I once again find myself spending a significant amount of time
    both reading and leaving comments. But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  • Awesome things here. I’m very happy to see your article. Thanks a lot and I’m looking forward to contact you.

    Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?