Mass. Supreme Court weighs challenge to Pledge of Allegiance

Print More
Andrew Hall, an atheist and father, demonstrates on Sept. 4, 2013 outside the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. He says recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools should be deemed unconstitutional in Massachusetts. Photo by G. Jeffrey MacDonald

Andrew Hall, an atheist and father, demonstrates on Sept. 4, 2013 outside the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. He says recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools should be deemed unconstitutional in Massachusetts. Photo by G. Jeffrey MacDonald

Active RNS subscribers and members can view this content by logging-in here.

(RNS) Challengers are taking a new tack by arguing the Pledge of Allegiance violates terms of the Massachusetts’ equal rights amendment, which provides that “all people are born free and equal,” and that equality cannot be abridged by “sex, race, color, creed or national origin.”

  • Fran

    Any person should have the “free will” to pledge or not pledge, for whatever reason they might have.

  • Andrew Hall

    Having “under God” in the Pledge states that patriotism is associated with God belief, and creates a separate class of atheist students who are stigmatized by their classmates.

  • Chris Godwin

    Let’s say a new pledge, for whatever reason we might have.

  • Ruth Holznagel

    I remember when “under God” was added to the pledge. For me it changed the original meaning of the pledge entirely by breaking the continuity of “. . . one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” THAT is the focus of our pledge and has meaning for every citizen, religious or not.

  • Pingback: 8 landmark church-state court decisions that shook America | On Freedom()

  • Pingback: Polish Beef * Miss World * Banned Rockers: Religious Freedom Roundup: Sept. 2 - Sept. 9 | On Freedom()