After backlash, atheist author cancels ‘God is an abusive boyfriend’ book

Print More
A draft image of a page from Hemant Mehta's upcoming book "God is an Abusive Boyfriend (and you should break up)".

A draft image of a page from Hemant Mehta's upcoming book "God is an Abusive Boyfriend (and you should break up)". Artwork by Tracey Moody, taken from the Kickstarter campaign and used with permission.

Active RNS subscribers and members can view this content by logging-in here.

"Friendly Atheist" Hemant Mehta has announced that his next book will draw parallels between belief in God and an abusive relationship—inspiring controversy among atheists.

  • Larry

    The main problem with dark humor is that it tends to draw ire of the self-righteous. People afraid of nervous laughter because they are too caught up with being serious to the public.

    Dark humor such as what Mehta is employing uses ridicule and humor to highlight something ghastly and repugnant. One laughs but one is also painfully aware of how grim a situation really is.

    In many ways this approach works better than deadly seriousness on many subjects. Overly earnest approaches always threaten to border on ridicule and undermine a message.

  • Will

    When will someone finally write a book that shows the end result of society adopting atheism. It would include the fact that every mass-murdering dictator of the 20th century was an atheist. (Oh, I forgot, there’s one exception: Hitler. He was a pagan.

    Chapters on Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc would be required. And maybe some on the little atheist dictators: Castro, Ho Chi Minh, etc.

  • Stephen

    thankfully Larry is here to contradict actual folks who’ve experienced intimate partner violence and tell us that, actually, this project is extremely good. thank you larry. you are one of the good ones.

  • Frank

    Sad to watch atheists doubling down of their foolishness.

  • tmalatesta

    Mehta repeatedly stressed that the book is not intended to belittle “actual physical abuse”.

    Maybe Richard Dawkins can help him with his wording?

  • Larry

    This is exactly the kind of smug self-serious, self-righteous half-thought out attitude that I was talking about. There is a certain level of nervous humor to be found in broaching subjects which are deeply disturbing.

    Some find it cathartic, some find it offensive. I find its a great way to keep people from dismissing important issues as being overly “hysterical”, like domestic violence. Some others do not. Opinions are great that way. So varied.

    Those people are entitled to their opinions. I did not contradict them. Not everyone is comfortable with dark humor. That is kind of the point.

  • Larry

    Every time a smug believer trots out this argument, it is just a sure sign the poster is ignorant or deliberately misstating history. Since it is usually done repeatedly by the same people, we can safely rule out ignorance.

    The destruction and disaster wreaked in the name of religion pales in comparison to any example you may try to trot out.

    Unfortunately for you your examples are also clear proof of what happens when one replaces the magical thinking of religion with some other form of magical thinking. Centuries of blind faith and socially sanctioned excuses for atrocity made it easy.

    Yes irrational appeals and dictatorships are bad. Too bad your beliefs are more likely to support them than atheism in this day and age.

  • I think the people who take exception *are* missing the point. The fact that abusive relationships are so genuinely and truly awful *is* the whole point — so if your relationship to a so-called “loving God” has those same characteristics, you should get out, run far away, and maybe get counselling to help you recover.

    Far from making light of abusive relationships, the book (and its author) takes them very seriously and says that if you find yourself in that sort of relationship with God, then it, too, is abusive and harmful and you should get out. If you don’t have a relationship with God that has those awful characteristics — it is not abusive. And the book is not talking to you. (That’s the “breadth of theism” right there. The book IS only talking to the abusive relationships, not the others.)

    Read some of the accounts of death threats from fundamentalist Christians to people they disagree with theologically (or politically) or the way some churches call a raped teenager (in front of the whole church) to repent because she “had sex” with the youth pastor (while he’s given a slap on the wrist and forgiven for his “mistake”) — and tell me those things aren’t abusive. **Those** are the people this book is for. And it’s trying to show them that they can be emotionally (and sometimes physically! death threats!) abused in their church and the interpretation of God that is foisted on them just as much as in their home by a spouse or significant other.

  • As a polytheist, I’m simply left wondering … which god? Granted, in the USA polytheism is a fairly small fraction of the theistic population so I suspect that in some ways Mr. Mehta isn’t really talking to us.

  • Pingback: Why it is Not Insensitive to Compare Fundie Religion to an Abusive Relationship | Whited Sepulchres()

  • Frank

    The problem is people think that God, who created us and knows us best and has a way of life that is in our best interests, is abusive if they can’t live exactly the way they want. They just deny the real God and substitute a god of their own making. Enter atheists….

    The greatest tragedy of all is when people think they know better than

  • Larry

    Show me on the doll where God touched you.

  • Deacon John M. Bresnahan

    To read some of the hate-filled modern atheist writings is like reading the hate-filled atheist, anti-Christian writing that flooded Russia before the Communist Revolution. The consolation for believers is: where is the Soviet Union now????.

  • Larry

    Militant atheists write on blogs and file lawsuits that are usually joined by members of minority faiths. Militant Christians kill people and demand that the government do it for them. Like AMERICAN Evangelicals are doing in Africa and Russia.

    As someone obviously ignorant of history, John, you should know it didn’t take much for the Russian people to bare their hostility towards the Orthodox Church. For centuries its support of the oppressive monarchy alienated them from the public. Of course the irony is, thanks to Putin, the same church is bringing back the pogrom after a century of its absence.

    John, why must you constantly spin lies and misrepresent people who do not believe as you do?

  • I understand Mehta’s analogy, and I agree with it to an extent. But the whole thing seems like it’s done in bad taste. Judging by the few emails I’ve exchanged with Mehta, I’m sure he doesn’t mean any harm. But the whole thing just seems problematic to me.

  • While they haven’t “adopted atheism,” which nobody is actually wanting anybody to do because that’d be just as wrong as trying to force the world to adopt one particular religion, many countries are way more secular than they are religious. Perhaps it would be enlightening to take a look at their statistics?

    Japan, most of Scandinavia, quite a big chunk of Europe, England, and a variety of other countries do not enshrine Christian privilege into law. And somehow they are not hellholes of oppression and dysfunction. To the contrary. The people you named were not trying to enforce atheism so much as trying to enforce a particular ideology, which they had elevated to religious status. The debunk to your apologetics myth is easily accessed; I found it within 30 seconds on Google. Perhaps you should research more before you write?

    There’s a very good video on YouTube as well that discusses what would happen if all the atheists left America–as many fundagelical Christians have openly said they wish would happen. I’m thankful to live in a secular society that doesn’t care what religion I adopt or don’t adopt. And you should be as well, considering the steady decline of your religion’s numbers. To be totally honest, the atheists I know are a lot more moral, kind, and law-abiding than the Christians I know, and way more passionate about civil rights and the right of every single person to believe whatever that person wants to believe about the supernatural. They would give you that right. Would you give them that right?

  • I have a religion blog myself. I normally refer to that being as “the Christian god” or “the god of the Bible.” There are lots of gods, and I see no reason to refer to that one as if he was the only one in the world or to give him some kind of special status.

    (If they’re going to make pagans sit out in the hall, they’d better realize we’re going to take the punch and cookies with us on the way out and have a lot more fun than they’re having in the main room.)

  • The Great God Pan

    “I think the people who take exception *are* missing the point.”

    Well, they are PRETENDING to miss the point. They oppose both the promotion of atheism and the criticism of religion, and they are trying to shut Mehta’s project down for that reason.. They are just using “social justice” rhetoric as a smokescreen because that’s what is currently trendy with the cool kids.

  • Rygar

    If you’re offended fine, but Chris, please stop letting people like Moglia and Jones use their personal trauma as leverage to guilt-trip other people and make them censor themselves. You should be able to make a rational point without inserting token “I was abused so I am right” people into your article. Lots of us have experienced abuse of some form or another, but we don’t all automatically agree on what is offensive or distasteful.

    Frankly, Skepchick in general is a catty gossip factory, the bloggers there are incredibly divisive, they offend many people daily with their own toxic rhetoric, and I’m not sure why you would even wish to associate with them at all.

  • Sam Crawford

    But they didn’t kill in the name of atheism. And even if they had, that wouldn’t be a reflection on other atheists any more than the Lord’s Resistance Army represents all Christians.

    Many of the least religious countries in the world today, such as theScandanavian nations, are among the most prosperous and safe. In the US, nonbelivers are 19 percent of the population, but just .02 percent of the prisoners.

  • Bem

    This is the best comment ever.

  • Hitler was a Catholic, and frequently mentioned Jesus in his speeches. Such as “I believe my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator” Mein Kampf, Chapter 2

    “we are a people of different faiths, but we are one. Which faith conquers the other is not the question; rather, the question is whether Christianity stands or falls…we tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity. In fact, our movement is Christian. We are filled with a desire for Catholics and Protestants to discover one another in the deep distress of own own people.” October 27, 1928, Passau, Bavaria. You can find lots more quotes and writings in the same vein.

  • What about the hate-filled actions of Christians?. Just by way of example, I’m thinking of Tomas de Torquemada, Cotton Mather, or pretty much any Pope in the Middle Ages.

  • Ah, I can see him tweeting the full text of the book. I’m sure it will be a joy to read. He’s quite handy with 140 characters.

  • The spiritual/emotional/social abuse inflicted upon people by churches, religious communities, and certain forms of theology are quite real and quite harmful. The topic needs to be talked about in an open, honest, sensitive, and mature way. There is a great need for this.

    Metha’s proposed book, however, seems unlikely to provide that kind of medium. From the few sample’s he’s presented, it unwittingly comes off as a tacky trivialization of a very serious problem. Honestly, it looks like an atheist version of a Chick tract (you can Google it—the blog won’t allow me to link to the wiki article). When your literature begins to resemble the low grade pulp productions of yesteryear’s religious fundamentalism, it might be time to step back and reassess your methods.

    Furthermore, to intermingle such a poor approach with other issues of abuse, such as domestic/partner abuse, really doesn’t do those issues much justice either. I can certainly see how that would anger and alienate people who’ve suffered through such horrific experiences.

    I’m certain there are many in the atheist community who can do far better than this. Hopefully, they can find the funding and time to offer such writing in published form.

  • rob


    why not just take a gun and shoot and kill as many of us Christians as you can ..

    that would be better then imply such a thing about God.

  • Pingback: Tilting at windmills: “Outrage culture” and manufacturing enemies | Gravity's Wings()

  • Pareidolius

    Poor Hemant, he didn’t realize that the Outrage Machine™ lays mines, too. We must all watch where we step . . .

  • gilhcan

    How about all the hate-filled Christian stuff coming from the mouths and writings of evangelical Christians? Non-theists are foolish to be like that in any way, but the history of Christianity and current events certainly display plenty of ignorance and hatred, so let’s not start casting stones at non-theists.

  • gilhcan

    The only explanation for the negative behavior of anyone toward those who think or believe differently than they is the insecurity of the ideas or beliefs of those who act negatively.

  • Jon Drake

    Mehta is such a liar.

    He continually heaps ridicule and scorn on opponents and then tries to hide behind saying “Of course I am not trying to offend anyone.”

    Pure B.S.

  • Jon Drake

    Mass murdering atheists have outdone any crimes ever committed in history.

    They have even provided enough nuclear weapons to every country that could afford them and have made it possible to not only destroy civilization in a day but to poison the earth for millennia.

  • Amy

    I’ve often thought of the religion that I was brought up in as very like an emotionally abusive romantic relationship: I’ve experienced both. The brand of dogmatic, retrograde Catholicism practiced by much of my family had a very negative, lasting impact on my life (and that of other children in my family), by attempting to instill in me awful ideas about women, human nature, and sexuality, denying me a quality early education, placing me in an atmosphere of constant fear with threats of eternal torment, and so on.

    In this comment thread, I’ve seen many people attack Mehta on the grounds that he trivializes abusive relationships by comparing them to religion. But many people subject others to terrible emotional, even physical, abuse on religious grounds, and I’m seeing that many of these attacks on Mehta could be just as well interpreted as trivializing religion-based abuse.

    All these forms of abuse should be critiqued, and humor is among the most effective tools of criticism. It helps people recognize and face up to the absurdity and horror of beliefs and human behavior in a way that plain prose and logical arguments often fail to do.

    On the whole, I endorse Mehta’s project, it could just use a little tweaking.

  • Larry

    Your ignorance of history and the world is duly noted. I can safely say there is no point in a rational intelligent discussion with you. So I won’t even bother. It is obvious you have your own little fictions to peddle and insults to hurl. Showing you the error of your statements is pointless because you won’t bother to read it and just repeat the same nonsense later. Lying and hating for God is a common practice.

    All I have to say is the mass murderers we are seeing today do so in the name of God(s). It is the fanatical religious people right now who are posing the most current and greatest threat to the liberties of others.

    Say what you want, but right now fanatical religious belief is the main problem in the world today.

  • Larry

    I don’t have to.

    You guys do it to yourselves. Christians don’t need much of an excuse to shoot other Christians. They have been doing it for centuries.

    If your God is so thin skinned and easily offended, then he is probably not a good God or worthy of praise.

  • Ignatz

    [The destruction and disaster wreaked in the name of religion pales in comparison to any example you may try to trot out. ]

    Yes, it does. (Read your sentence again.) Atheist governments have slaughtered more people in the last hundred years than theistic ones have in the last two thousand. In fact, I think there is not a single officially atheist government (atheist, not secular) that HASN’T slaughtered people, and didn’t begin doing so immediately upon being established.

    And they have achieved none of the contributions of theistic governments, which pretty much created Western civilization.

  • Pingback: Outraged in Sevenoaks()

  • Ignatz

    [England, and a variety of other countries do not enshrine Christian privilege into law.]

    The Archbishop of Canterbury has a seat in Parliament. The Book of Common Prayer cannot be changed without an act of the legislature. That’s why they still use the one from 1620.

  • Frank Gary

    Hello World, I am writing this little article to recommend the man that has changed my life and brought happiness and prosperity to my family. His is Prince Duro of ultimaterelationshipsolution@gmail. com. He cast a love spell that brought back my wife after separating for 2years. I thought it won’t be possible because she has already moved on with another man.

    I can’t continue to keep quiet than to tell the world about the man that helped me get back my family, he is kind and prays to God, he doesn’t do blood sacrifice and kill any stuff. He opened up to me and told me everything that I need to know about his work that he inherited his powers from his late grandfather and the spiritual power has been in their lineage for ages.

    All I can say now is thank you Prince Duro for what you have done for my family and job. Please have no doubt anymore about getting back the love of your life and email Prince Duro on ultimaterelationshipsolution@gmail. com

  • Bruce Gorton

    Hitler (the holocaust) – was Catholic.
    Juvénal Habyarimana (The Rwanda genocide) – was Catholic
    Robert Mugabe (The Matibililand genocide) – is Catholic
    Leopold II of Belgium (Congo genocdie) – Catholic
    Yakubu Gowon (Biafra genocide) – Christian

    But hey, if you weren’t a lying shitstain, you wouldn’t be religious.

  • Bruce Gorton

    Actually the theist states killed more, it just wasn’t counted the same.

    You can see this in the average lifespans.

    Under Stalin for example the average lifespan rose to around 50, before he came along it was closer 30.

    The very Christian Tsarist government was actually worse, it just didn’t get counted as genocide because poor healthcare and manmade famines were the norm in religious royalist societies.

    Under Stalin, they were the exception – thus got counted.

  • Bruce Gorton

    Only one country has ever actually used a nuke on people, and that is America, which you lot keep telling us is a Christian nation.

    Also, that is the nation most singularly opposed to doing anything about climate change or pollution in general. If you want to talk about poisoning the Earth, think about where your country comes into it.

  • TSD

    Are you seriously going to imply every communist that carried out atrocities under Stalin was an atheist? Or that no Nazi officers pulling strings at death camps were Christians?

    The idea is simply ludicrous. For all of the “non-believing” mass murdering dictators, there were far more religious believers carrying out their orders.

  • Pingback: Wednesday Link List | Thinking Out Loud()

  • Hi, I wish for to subscribe for this weblog to get most recent updates,
    thus where can i do it please assist.

  • Formulating your art around a flimsy (at best) analogy, then retroactively defending your lack of pre conceit is lazy, but mostly it’s stupid. Find better ideas.

  • hello there and thank you for your information – I have definitely picked up anything new
    from right here. I did however expertise some technical issues using
    this website, as I experienced to reload the website a
    lot of times previous to I could get it to load correctly.
    I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK?
    Not that I’m complaining, but sluggish loading instances
    times will sometimes affect your placement in google and can damage your
    quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords.
    Anyway I am adding this RSS to my e-mail and could look out for much more
    of your respective interesting content. Ensure that you update this again soon.

  • No matter if some one searches for his vital thing, therefore he/she wishes to be
    available that in detail, thus that thing is maintained over here.

  • After looking over a number of the blog articles on your web site, I truly appreciate your technique of writing a blog.
    I bookmarked it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back in the near future.
    Take a look at my web site too and let me know your opinion.

  • Good day very cool site!! Guy .. Excellent .. Wonderful ..
    I will bookmark your website and take the feeds additionally?

    I am glad to seek out numerous useful information here in the submit, we want work
    out more techniques on this regard, thanks for sharing.
    . . . . .