Fighting perceptions, evangelicals and Muslims commit to oppose religious bigotry

Print More
Imam Talib Shareef, president of Masjid Muhammad in Washington, D.C., signs a pledge to denounce bigotry and defend religious freedom at a ceremony outside Washington National Cathedral on Oct. 23, 2015. Photo courtesy Danielle Thomas/Washington National Cathedral

Imam Talib Shareef, president of Masjid Muhammad in Washington, D.C., signs a pledge to denounce bigotry and defend religious freedom at a ceremony outside Washington National Cathedral on Oct. 23, 2015. Photo courtesy Danielle Thomas/Washington National Cathedral

Active RNS subscribers and members can view this content by logging-in here.

WASHINGTON (RNS) Although mainline Christians have worked together for years on interfaith initiatives, the work of evangelicals and Muslims is a newer dimension in efforts to foster religious understanding.

  • Pingback: Fighting perceptions, evangelicals and Muslims commit to oppose religious bigotry - mosaicversemosaicverse()

  • Bernardo

    How is this going to work when the Koran teaches the following?

    o “Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends.” (Surah 5:51)

  • Jack

    There have been plenty of Christians who thought Muslims were their friends in Iraq, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, etc…
    They’re mostly dead or in exile now.

  • The only Religious Freedom we need is the one we already have!

    “Congress shall make no law establishing a religion nor prohibit the free exercise thereof” – US CONSTITUTION

    To go any farther than this would break the rules.

  • Bernardo

    Once again, the issue:

    o “Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends.” (Surah 5:51)

    And please no “out of context” excuse. Iams and terrorists don’t follow excuse but follow the literal word of the Koran.

  • Bernardo

    Oops, make that “imams”.

  • Ah, so this means you’re free to mistreat, harangue and harass Muslims? Really!? Interesting you’d think that — and given what you said, I have to assume you do — given that this is “two wrongs make a right” thinking, which happens to be fallacious.

    Oh, and let’s not forget that Christians have some of their own issues (http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/2015/08/23/the-kind-of-terrorism-that-gets-far-too-little-attention/). So let’s not act all sanctimonious and pretend that Christianity is somehow impervious to being exploited by evildoers or in driving its followers to do evil in its name. They CAN do so; they HAVE done so; and they WILL do so in the future.

    If you don’t like hearing that … well, too bad so sad for you. Get over your Christianist superiority complex already.

  • Ben in Oakland

    “The pledge reads: “I pledge and commit to the American people that I will uphold and defend the freedom of conscience and religion of all individuals; and reject and speak out, without reservation, against bigotry, discrimination, harassment, and violence based on religion or belief.”

    Except for those icky gay people, and the Not True Christians/Jews/Muslims/Buddhists/Atheists and the Ministers/Rabbis/Imams/Churches/Temples/Denominations who support them…

    because that really isn’t about discrimination on the basis of religious belief at all, but just discrimination and opposition to sinful lifestyles that and enemies of God and humanity.

    And really, who could find bigotry is THAT?

  • Pingback: Evangelicals and Muslims Sign Pledge at Washington National Cathedral to Denounce Religious Bigotry | BCNN1 – Black Christian News Network()

  • Max, the pledge articulated and signed by these fine people is a compliment and is connected to our constitutional freedoms. Pledging to fight bigotry and for religious freedom is not a violation of constitutional law or rules.

  • As someone who was there and who signed the pledge as a participant in multifaith engagement that includes Muslims and Christians, what we do in America in this area has ramifications around the globe for good or ill. According to good survey data by Gallup, the vast majority of Muslims want peace and decry terrorist violence. Christians should come alongside such people in love of neighbor (and enemy if you construe them this way) in order to develop relationships, understand each other, hold our irreconcilable differences in peaceful tension, and work together toward peace in the world.

  • Much like Judaism, in Islam there is a long history of scriptural interpretation that is legal and scholarly with various schools of jurisprudence that have arisen. As a religious community Muslims look to their tradition and these hermeneutical systems to understand their text. For someone to grab a text in an English translation of the Qur’an and then try to arrive at a “literal” interpretation, and then to go further and accuse Muslims of failing to respond to such an interpretation is way off base. We Christians really need to do a better job in our religious literacy in general, and in understanding the religion of Islam and Muslims in particular.

  • @John,

    The part of the pledge which refers to censoring religious ‘bigotry’ is a misstep. Of course bigotry is horrible. But arguing against a religion is not bigoted – the pledge goes to far in that regard. Religions are just ideas.

    An open argument against religion is a necessary opinion. And to forbid opinions (as this pledge does) is devious, counterproductive and wrongheaded.

  • @John Morehead,

    A Holy book does not come with a user’s manuals. And that is the problem!
    They insist they are the user’s manual.

    Religion must be freely discussed and argued over with words and not weapons. But this pledge wrongfully calls such argument ‘bigotry’ – this criminalizing of conversation must stop.

  • @John,

    You argue for a world where ideas must protected from offense. That is completely unfree.
    Ideas (ideologies) must never be placed in a higher place than the people who are affected by them.

  • “We Christians really need to do a better job in our religious literacy in general, and in understanding the religion of Islam and Muslims in particular.”

    Wrong. We must ALL understand each other better. And shutting down conversation about religion as this silly pledge does, is a wrong move. Fortunately, the pledge has no teeth. Our freedom of speech will be upheld in the courts.

    I have the right to criticize all religions. And you are trying to take that right away from me.

  • Bernardo

    John,

    Actions speak louder than words and they prove what many Muslims if not all believe.

    Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” :

    The massacre in Mumbai, the assassinations of Bhutto and Theo Van Gogh, the conduct of the seven Muslim doctors in the UK, the 9/11 terrorists, the 24/7 Sunni suicide/roadside/market/mosque bombers, the 24/7 Shiite suicide/roadside/market/mosque bombers, the Islamic bombers of the trains in the UK and Spain, the Bali crazies, the Kenya crazies, the Pakistani “koranics”, the Palestine suicide bombers/rocketeers, the Lebanese nutcases, the Taliban nut jobs, the Ft. Hood follower of the koran, the Filipino “koranics”and the Boston Marthon bombers.

  • Ben in OAkland

    And what do you have to say about religious freedom and gay people?

  • Bernardo –

    “Actions speak louder…”

    Stop it please! Muslims are not the problem. Start behaving and thinking.
    You are a demonstration of bigotry. You are against “THEM” instead of “IT”. Bigotry is when you lump people together as when you speak of MUSLIMS.
    This is why the word ‘bigotry’ must be excluded from this pledge. The enemies are the depraved religions and NOT Muslims, the vast majority of whom are wonderful people who are forbidden by their own religion to doubt their Imams or question their Laws!

    The religious need to be free to question their own religions!
    Only free speech will do that. The bigotry clause in this pledge is the enemy of freedom.

  • Bernardo

    Max, Max, Max,

    I am not against Muslims. I am against their book of horror and terror that dictates death to all apostates and infidels. And Muslims by the way are not free to question their own religion. There are programs for freeing Muslims from this tyranny but no Muslim dares to follow it.

    One example:

    From the studies of Armstrong, Rushdie, Hirsi Ali, Richardson and Bayhaqi————–

    The Five Steps To Deprogram 1400 Years of Islamic Myths:

    ( –The Steps take less than two minutes to finish- simply amazing, two minutes to bring peace and rationality to over one billion lost souls- Priceless!!!)

    Are you ready?

    Using “The 77 Branches of Islamic “faith” a collection compiled by Imam Bayhaqi as a starting point. In it, he explains the essential virtues that reflect true “faith” (iman) through related Qur’anic verses and Prophetic sayings.” i.e. a nice summary of the Koran and Islamic beliefs.

    The First Five of the 77 Branches:

    Continued below:

  • Bernardo

    “1. Belief in Allah”

    aka as God, Yahweh, Zeus, Jehovah, Mother Nature, etc. should be added to your self-cleansing neurons.

    “2. To believe that everything other than Allah was non-existent. Thereafter, Allah Most High created these things and subsequently they came into existence.”

    Evolution and the Big Bang or the “Gib Gnab” (when the universe starts to recycle) are more plausible and the “akas” for Allah should be included if you continue to be a “crea-tionist”.

    “3. To believe in the existence of angels.”

    A major item for neuron cleansing. Angels/de-vils are the mythical creations of ancient civilizations, e.g. Hitt-ites, to explain/define natural events, contacts with their gods, big birds, sudden winds, protectors during the dark nights, etc. No “pretty/ugly wingy thingies” ever visited or talked to Mohammed, Jesus, Mary or Joseph or Joe Smith. Today we would classify angels as fairies and “tinker be-lls”. Modern devils are classified as the demons…

  • Pingback: 美國數十位福音派牧師及伊斯蘭領袖提倡友愛和尊重 - 信仰百川()