(RNS) In February of 1993, Washington Post political reporter Michael Weisskopf wrote that the followers of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson “are largely poor, uneducated and easy to command.”
The next day, after a flood of angry phone calls, the Post printed one of the most abject retractions in the history of journalism: “There is no factual basis for that statement.”
Religious conservatives have ever since cited Weisskopf’s line as proof positive of the mainstream media’s contempt for people of faith. But a quarter-century later, it may be time to revisit its factual basis.
This election season, we all have become aware that support for the two main presidential candidates varies according to level of education. Americans with college degrees are more likely to support Hillary Clinton. Those without trend toward Donald Trump.
Now comes fivethirtyeight.com with survey data showing that education together with religious attendance constitute “the two most predictive variables” in presidential choice among white people. And Milo Beckman presents a nifty chart that shows how.
Education and religious attendance
Seventy-seven percent of non-religious-attending white college graduates support Clinton, as compared to 23 percent of weekly-attenders who never went to college. If they are religious attenders and have a college degree, they’re far more likely to support Clinton than non-degree-holding weekly or occasional religious attenders.
In other words, Trump’s white followers — which is to say, most of them — tend to be religious attenders who are “largely uneducated.”
They’re not poor. “Despite the myth that Trump’s base is poor whites,” writes Beckman, “income is the least predictive of white voter support among the seven demographic variables tracked by the poll.”
Are those uneducated religious supporters easy to command? That’s a trickier question.
They certainly are ignoring #nevertrump evangelical leaders like the Southern Baptist Convention’s Russell Moore. Perhaps they would be less supportive of the GOP nominee were it not for enthusiasts like Jerry Falwell, Jr.
But however you slice it, they appear prepared to heed The Donald, whatever he commands.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
The key religious factor in the election
(RNS) Reconsidering the "poor, uneducated and easy to command" characterization of conservative religious voters. Maybe it's not all wrong.
Trump rally in Hartford, April 2016
(RNS) In February of 1993, Washington Post political reporter Michael Weisskopf wrote that the followers of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson “are largely poor, uneducated and easy to command.”
The next day, after a flood of angry phone calls, the Post printed one of the most abject retractions in the history of journalism: “There is no factual basis for that statement.”
Religious conservatives have ever since cited Weisskopf’s line as proof positive of the mainstream media’s contempt for people of faith. But a quarter-century later, it may be time to revisit its factual basis.
This election season, we all have become aware that support for the two main presidential candidates varies according to level of education. Americans with college degrees are more likely to support Hillary Clinton. Those without trend toward Donald Trump.
Now comes fivethirtyeight.com with survey data showing that education together with religious attendance constitute “the two most predictive variables” in presidential choice among white people. And Milo Beckman presents a nifty chart that shows how.
Education and religious attendance
Seventy-seven percent of non-religious-attending white college graduates support Clinton, as compared to 23 percent of weekly-attenders who never went to college. If they are religious attenders and have a college degree, they’re far more likely to support Clinton than non-degree-holding weekly or occasional religious attenders.
In other words, Trump’s white followers — which is to say, most of them — tend to be religious attenders who are “largely uneducated.”
They’re not poor. “Despite the myth that Trump’s base is poor whites,” writes Beckman, “income is the least predictive of white voter support among the seven demographic variables tracked by the poll.”
Are those uneducated religious supporters easy to command? That’s a trickier question.
They certainly are ignoring #nevertrump evangelical leaders like the Southern Baptist Convention’s Russell Moore. Perhaps they would be less supportive of the GOP nominee were it not for enthusiasts like Jerry Falwell, Jr.
But however you slice it, they appear prepared to heed The Donald, whatever he commands.