Simone Petrella, chief cyberstrategy officer of CyberVista, speaks during a panel discussion on “Cyber Attacks and Just War Theory” at the National Press Club on May 22, 2017. RNS photo by Adelle M. Banks

Can a cyberattack trigger a 'just war'?

WASHINGTON (RNS) Ethicists are only just beginning to grapple with the growing problem of cyberattacks, a form of aggression that challenges traditional ways of thinking about morality and war.

Some argue that the advent of cyberwar, as with the invention of nuclear weapons, pushes civilization across a boundary, said the Rev. Bryan Hehir, who teaches religion and politics at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government. Assessing and responding to cyberthreats must differ from our moral approach to conventional warfare, Hehir said.

"The question is, how are we going to judge it?"

The Rev. Bryan Hehir, professor of the practice of religion and public life at Harvard Kennedy School, speaks during a panel discussion on “Cyber Attacks and Just War Theory” at the National Press Club on May 22, 2017. RNS photo by Adelle M. Banks


 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

Hehir spoke on a panel Monday (May 22) that mulled the application of "just war" theory to cyberattacks, an increasingly damaging weapon wielded by governments, criminals, thrill-seekers and others trying to influence, destabilize and destroy. Ongoing investigations by several federal agencies link Russia to cyberintervention in the 2016 presidential elections.

Just war theory, rooted in the fifth-century writings of St. Augustine of Hippo, takes a middle ground between pacifism, which never allows for violence, and realpolitik, which is suspect of moral considerations in defense and warfare.

Just war theory can be adapted to address technological innovation, said Hehir.

[ad number=“1”]

But cyberattacks present unique questions to their victims, who often can't figure out the perpetrators, said panelist Simone Petrella, chief of cyberstrategy at CyberVista, a Washington-based firm that helps companies defend themselves from cyberattacks.

"When you can't do attribution it is very difficult to figure out what your retribution is going to be," she said.

Retired Brig. Gen. David G. Reist, program manager of Knowledge Management Inc., speaks during a panel discussion on “Cyber Attacks and Just War Theory” at the National Press Club on May 22, 2017. RNS photo by Adelle M. Banks


 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

Retired Marine Corps Brig. Gen. David G. Reist, who has a background in cybersecurity, posed the question of governments' culpability for cyberattacks generated on their soil. "Are you responsible for what goes on in your own house?" he said.

Tom Gallagher, CEO and publisher of Religion News Service, who moderated the panel at the National Press Club, asked when a cyberattack might trigger a military response.

"What's your sense of the amount of harm that needs to be experienced," asked Gallagher, who is also CEO of the Religion News Foundation.

Hehir favored a large "gap" between a cyberattack and a conventional response.

[ad number=“2”]

War, he said more than once during the panel, is "at the edge of the moral universe."

RNS, the Religion News Foundation, Public Strategies Washington Inc. and CyberVista sponsored the panel.

Comments

  1. With cyber attacks as with any other response to a crime or violation of a national security, measured response is appropriate. Cyber attacks could result in deaths and destruction of all types of vital property. Nations that are the origins of the attack should be given ample warning to change their ways or assistance if it is independent actors that originated the attacks. Nations that continue to sponsor or all the attacks should be prepared to suffer the consequences in proportion to the damage done.

Leave a Comment