Pastor Charles Stoker looks over damage to Hi-Way Tabernacle Assembly of God Church after Hurricane Harvey in Cleveland, Texas, north of Houston. Photo courtesy of Becket Law Firm

Hurricane-damaged houses of worship can receive FEMA aid

WASHINGTON (RNS) — After lawsuits and a Supreme Court decision, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has issued a new policy extending disaster relief to churches, synagogues and other congregations.

Addressing a church-state separation issue, the agency's latest policy guide says FEMA made the change so houses of worship aren't considered ineligible "on the basis of the religious character or primarily religious use of the facility.”

[ad number=“1”]

It cites the June 2017 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer, in which the high court ruled 7-2 in favor of a Missouri church that claimed religious discrimination after it was refused state funds to improve its playground.

Flooding of the Harvest Family Church during Hurricane Harvey in Cypress, Texas. Photo courtesy of Becket Law Firm

In FEMA's previous guide, language deemed private nonprofits ineligible for aid if they primarily offered religious activities — including worship and religious instruction. That language has been removed from the policy guide released Tuesday (Jan. 2).

President Trump tweeted in September that Texas churches should be “entitled to reimbursement from FEMA” for aiding Hurricane Harvey victims. Texas officials followed up and asked him to change the FEMA policy so affected houses of worship could get rebuilding assistance.

FEMA was sued by three Texas churches damaged by Harvey. They challenged the previous FEMA policy, saying it “explicitly denies equal access to FEMA disaster relief grants for houses of worship solely because of their religious status.” Later, two Florida synagogues damaged by Hurricane Irma also sued FEMA.

“Better late than never,” said Daniel Blomberg, a lawyer with the nonprofit law firm Becket, which represents the Texas churches and the Florida synagogues. “By finally following the Constitution, FEMA is getting rid of second-class status for churches.”

[ad number=“2”]

Americans United for Separation of Church and State expressed concern about the new policy, tweeting, “The new FEMA policy raises very serious constitutional questions by appearing to authorize problematic tax aid to churches.”

And Larry T. Decker, executive director of the Secular Coalition for America, said: "A government that truly values religious freedom can never be in the business of building churches."

[ad number=“3”]

But Nathan Diament, public policy director for the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, hailed the policy change, which his organization sought for more than 15 years.

“We thank the Trump Administration for righting this long-time wrong and treating disaster-damaged churches, synagogues & other houses of worship fairly — on the same terms as other nonprofits such as museums, community centers and libraries stricken by natural disasters,” he said in a statement.

Damage to the roof of the Rockport Assembly of God Church after Hurricane Harvey in Rockport, Texas. Photo courtesy of Becket Law Firm

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

Diament hopes the Senate will soon pass legislation recently approved by the House that would make the policy change a part of federal law.

The courts also are continuing to consider the suits by houses of worship. A judge denied the churches’ request for a temporary restraining order in December and their case is on appeal. The synagogues’ case is pending in a district court.


  1. Should this avenue be opened to churches, there will be little to stop them from taking precedence away from real victims of natural disasters.

  2. I guess people who go to church, synogogue or mosque are not “real”. Hmm…

  3. As the article notes, the avenue was opened with the Trinity Lutheran decision. There really is no such thing as a sufficiently narrow decision where church-state separation is concerned. Any breach in the wall is a wedge to prop open the floodgates, and this is just the first of what I’m sure will be many uses of the earlier decision to do an end run around the Establishment Clause.

    Screw these institutions. Seriously. They’re exempt from taxation, but expect to benefit from not only their members/benefactors’ donations, but also taxpayer money. And any good they do is extremely limited in scope, proportionally tiny compared to their budgets and extravagance.

  4. Can you imagine the billions in revenue that can be generated from property taxes?!

  5. They are if their homes are destroyed. If a special building is required to perform rituals to a deity, might want to find a different deity.

  6. Isn’t this interesting? And here I’d thought all the Religious Right’s talk, over the last few years, about “makers and takers” … i.e. how the “takers” are profiting unjustly at the expense of “makers,” and that needs to be stopped … was based on their philosophy of personal responsibility and all that jazz. 

    But here we have the R.R.’s churches — which are tax-exempt — “taking” FEMA aid, in spite of not having contributed anything to the public coffers. This is something the R.R. has no problem with … apparently. 

    Talk about things that make you go “Hmmmm.” I’m picking up a whiff of “hypocrisy” here, which the R.R.’s Jesus explicitly forbid them ever to engage in. But hey, what could this insolent, cynical, godless agnostic heathen possibly know about such important and sacred considerations, right? 

  7. It’s a simple enough principle, when it comes to the disbursement of state funds churches should be treated the same as other non-profits — not better, but not worse either.

  8. Disgusting! These people do not pay taxes, yet they get money from the taxpayers. All except Puerto Rico, probably because they are Hispanic.

  9. Let them receive payment directly from heaven, after all, “God provides”. Heavenly concerns are never a matter for public policy. If they wish to avail themselves of ANY public service then they must pay taxes.

  10. Non-profit?! What a joke! Religion shucked their piety and poverty snakeskin many centuries ago. The church hierarchy live like princes and seem to be immune from prosecution for their penchant for pedophillia, sexual assault, child abuse, and their eternal con game. If there ever was a criminal case that deserves, that really demands a RICO charge, it is religion. Using extortion to force their snake oil on an innocent public. How is that not illegal?

Leave a Comment