Beliefs Brian Pellot: On Freedom Opinion

Indonesia’s ‘virginity tests’ don’t weed out prostitutes, they violate human rights

shutterstock_104652896So you want to serve and protect your country, maintain order and uphold the rule of law? Excellent. Now strip down and sit back while we toss out our nondiscriminatory principles, violate your human right to privacy and break international law in cruel and inhuman ways.

That’s essentially what Indonesia is telling its female police and military recruits by subjecting them to “two-finger” and hymen tests to determine whether they are a) “virgins” or b) “prostitutes.” Non-virginal married women are barred from serving, a separate can of worms I’ll open anon.

“The procedure has been practiced for a long time,” Indonesia’s National Police Inspector General Moechgiyarto told reporters last month. “If [a candidate] turns out to be a prostitute, then how could we accept her for the job?”

“That’s just how we’ve always done it,” is a pretty terrible argument to my progressive ears, but let’s hear him out. These mystical hymen divinators can allegedly tell whether or not you get paid for sex by prodding around down there. Not whether you’ve ever ridden a horse or done a cartwheel or pleasured yourself or had consensual sex or merely walked. Just whether or not you’re a prostitute, which is a “crime against morality” (yet widely practiced) in Indonesia and would presumably prevent you from becoming a police officer. Makes sense until it doesn’t, which is immediately.

My experience with hymens and vaginal laxity is…limited, but I trust science, medicine and logic enough to know that such tests are totally and utterly nonsensical, which is a polite way of saying that they’re bull$#!+. Hymens — or vaginal coronas if you prefer — are fragile and don’t require johns or even intercourse to be “compromised.”

In short, Indonesia’s government is subjecting women it wants to uphold the law to cruel and inhuman treatment that violates international law.

Why aren’t men subject to similar painful and embarrassing procedures? Because sexism. Because tradition. Because proving male “virginity” with any accuracy would be ridiculous and impossible, just like it is for women.

Human Right Watch has documented similar “virginity tests” on detainees and rape survivors in Egypt, Afghanistan and India, calling in each case for the practice to be abolished, a call I echo loudly.

If Indonesian officials wants to ensure the “morality” of female police officers (and schoolgirls, separate story) by stripping them of their dignity, they might want to rethink how they define “moral.” These tests are anything but.

About the author

Brian Pellot

Brian Pellot is based in Cape Town, South Africa.


Click here to post a comment

  • Women and their sexuality must be controlled. Because GAWD!

    Women and their sexuality must be controlled, because otherwise, men will sin, and that’s all that is really important.

    not men sinning.


  • How much is going on between your ‘progressive ears’? If you’re complaining about medical examinations given to police recruits (which are no more invasive than the medical examinations given by occidental gynecologists), you have a parochial and overly prescriptive conception of ‘human rights’. If you’ve nothing serious to discuss in this realm, discuss something else.

  • Who cares if the tests are intrusive if they provide a great service to the police force???? The main issue with them is their unreliability, not whether or not they’re performed.The National Police Inspector is completely right when he says he doesn’t want prostitutes in the police!! We don’t want disreputable individuals becoming those in charge of enforcing the law. Prostitutes are perhaps some of the most sleazy criminals around and you’re suggesting we get rid of a test that weeds out these hookers who would probably just want to have the job so they can be an insider for their pimps. I applaud Indonesia’s attempt to clean up the police force from the very beginning of the recruitment process. Hopefully they can find some other, better test that actually definitively can tell if someone is a prostitute and then we can adopt it in the US!!

  • Who cares? I’m pretty sure only a man would say that, one who is completely unversed in all of the ways a woman’s hymen can be broken.

    But of course, you MUST have an infallible way to ensure that none of the men have actually visited a prostitute, right? because otherwise, someone might think you’re some kind of a flaming, misogynistic hypocrite.