Mastodon

Obama v. Judeo-Christian Values

Sneaking in a few minutes yesterday to do a conference call with thousands of Ralph Reed's Faith and Freedom evangelicals, Paul Ryan averred that President Obama had put the country on "a dangerous path."

Obama v. Judeo-Christian Values
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and evangelist Billy Graham in a 1962 photo. Photo courtesy of Billy Graham Evangelistic Association

Sneaking in a few minutes yesterday to do a conference call with thousands of Ralph Reed's Faith and Freedom evangelicals, Paul Ryan averred that President Obama had put the country on “a dangerous path”; to wit:

It's a path that grows government, restricts freedom and liberty, and compromises those values, those Judeo-Christian, Western civilization values that made us such a great an[d] exceptional nation in the first place.

Evangelicals have been pledging allegiance to Judeo-Christian America for decades–ever since the rest of the country began to tire of that Cold War shibboleth in the 1970s. This was Ryan's cute way of calling the president both unAmerican and anti-evangelical. 

But it also begs the question of which particular foundational values the Obama path is compromising.


Opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage may, by evangelical lights, be core Judeo-Christian values, but it is hard to claim that these made America great and exceptional in the first place. One original value that set U.S. apart from the community of nations was the refusal to have an establishment of religion, but that's pretty much a minority report in the Judeo-Christian scheme of things.

Personally, I think that Judeo-Christian value that made our nation so great and exceptional was the conviction that we were great and exceptional. It's something we inherited from the sense of chosenness that the Jews inherited from Abraham and the Christians inherited from the Jews.  

But, answering a reporter's question at a NATO summit in Strasburg in 2009, President Obama seemed less than a true believer: “I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.”

That's a dangerous, dangerous path.

 

No paywalls here. Thanks to you.
As an independent nonprofit, RNS believes everyone should have access to coverage of religion that is fair, thoughtful and inclusive. That's why you will never hit a paywall on our site; you can read all the stories and columns you want, free of charge (and we hope you read a lot of them!)

But, of course, producing this journalism carries a high cost, to support the reporters, editors, columnists, and the behind-the-scenes staff that keep this site up and running. That's why we ask that if you can, you consider becoming one of our donors. Any amount helps, and because we're a nonprofit, all of it goes to support our mission: To produce thoughtful, factual coverage of religion that helps you better understand the world. Thank you for reading and supporting RNS.
Deborah Caldwell, CEO and Publisher
Donate today