Reinhold Niebuhr, then-dean emeritus of New York’s Union Theological Seminary. Religion News Service file photo

COMMENTARY: How I discovered I was wrong about the origin of the Serenity Prayer

(RNS) In 2008 I made the front page of The New York Times by asserting that the greatest American theologian of the 20th century probably did not originate the most famous and beloved prayer of the 20th century.

(Date unknown) Dr. Reinhold Niebuhr, then dean emeritus of New York's Union Theological Seminary. Religion News Service file photo

(Date unknown) Reinhold Niebuhr, then dean emeritus of New York's Union Theological Seminary. Religion News Service file photo

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

The theologian was Reinhold Niebuhr. The prayer was the Serenity Prayer, commonly quoted as: "God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference."

Its adoption by Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programs has propelled it to worldwide renown. I now am able to report that I have uncovered new evidence establishing to a high degree of confidence that Niebuhr did originate the Serenity Prayer.

My initial assertion questioning Reinhold Niebuhr's priority engendered considerable controversy and was strongly contested by Niebuhr’s daughter, the eminent publisher Elisabeth Sifton.

Sifton’s 2003 book “The Serenity Prayer” featured a specific account of her father’s writing the prayer for a Sunday service in Heath, Mass., in 1943. In no less than 13 places, she characterized Heath as the place and time of composition.

It is because I relied on her story that, when I discovered eight instances of the prayer’s being printed in newspapers and books between January 1936 and April 1942 -- none of which mentioned Niebuhr -- I concluded that he appeared to have drawn unconsciously on earlier versions of unknown authorship.

The year after the Times story, Stephen Goranson of the Duke University Library posted a message on the American Dialect Society’s Internet discussion list stating that he had found an occurrence of the Serenity Prayer in a 1937 Christian student newsletter, which referred to "the prayer attributed to Reinhold Niebuhr."

I quickly contacted the Times editors and alerted them that, in my view, Goranson’s discovery had significantly increased the likelihood that Niebuhr was, indeed, the original author. The Times then published a second front-page story reporting my reaction to the new information.

In “The Yale Book of Quotations” I edited, I had applied techniques of computer-assisted research to trace the provenance of famous quotations and proverbs. When, in the course of that work, I came to one of the most celebrated of all sayings, the Serenity Prayer, I found examples of its use back to 1936 by searching ProQuest Historical Newspapers, NewspaperArchive and Google Books.

After the articles in The New York Times and Yale Alumni Magazine, I enhanced my repertoire of electronic resources with additional newspaper archives.

By searching, I found that the Santa Cruz Sentinel of March 15, 1933, quoted Winnifred Crane Wygal: "Oh, God, give us courage to change what must be altered, serenity to accept what cannot be helped, and insight to know the one from the other."

The newspaper gave as its source an article by Wygal in The Woman’s Press, a publication of the National Board of the YWCA. I was able to verify that article, "On the Edge of Tomorrow," in The Woman’s Press of March 1933. The wording there was the same as in the Sentinel: It appeared as an epigraph and Reinhold Niebuhr was discussed, but no connection was made between the prayer and Niebuhr.

Although she did not link up prayer and theologian in her article, Wygal was clearly associated with Niebuhr. A biographical note about her from the Schlesinger Library on the History of Women at Harvard states that Wygal did postgraduate work at Union Theological Seminary, studying there with Niebuhr and Paul Tillich.

Wygal did make the crucial connection in her 1940 book, “We Plan Our Own Worship Services.” On Page 25 she wrote, "‘O God, give us the serenity to accept what cannot be changed, the courage to change what can be changed, and the wisdom to know the one from the other.’ (Reinhold Niebuhr).”

That attribution by Wygal might in and of itself be viewed as the final confirmation of Niebuhr’s coinage. There is an even stronger confirmation, however, located at the Schlesinger Library in its 14 volumes of Wygal’s diaries, which, at my request, the library generously assigned a staff member to skim, looking for references to the Serenity Prayer.

Schlesinger’s staffer, Sarah Guzy, struck gold when she read Wygal’s diary entry for Oct. 31, 1932.

Wygal wrote there: “R.N. says that ‘moral will plus imagination are the two elements of which faith is compounded.’
‘The victorious man in the day of crisis is the man who has the serenity to accept what he cannot help and the courage to change what must be altered.’”

Fred Shapiro is an associate library director and lecturer in legal research at Yale Law School and editor of "The Yale Book of Quotations" from Yale University Press. Photo courtesy of Fred Shapiro

Fred Shapiro is an associate library director and lecturer in legal research at Yale Law School and editor of "The Yale Book of Quotations" from Yale University Press. Photo courtesy of Fred Shapiro

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

The second of those Niebuhr quotations does not fully match the components of the tripartite Serenity Prayer, lacking the "wisdom" or "insight" element, but definitely does include the elements involving "serenity" and "courage."

The 1932 partial Serenity Prayer is the data point that clinches the argument for "R.N." (Reinhold Niebuhr) as Wygal’s source for the prayer and as its originator.

Many of the early occurrences of the prayer were in YWCA contexts; Wygal, a longtime YWCA official, is a highly plausible disseminator for those YWCA usages. Beginning in 1937, other commentators ascribed the origination to Niebuhr, including an attribution in a booklet titled “Prayers for a Busy Day,” published by the YWCA in 1938, and there were no competing claims of authorship until some years later.

Perhaps now we can be serene knowing that the long-standing dispute over who wrote this beloved prayer has at last itself attained serenity.

(Fred Shapiro is an associate library director and lecturer in legal research at Yale Law School and editor of "The Yale Book of Quotations" from Yale University Press. This is an abridged version of an article that appeared in the April 28 issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education.)



  1. Thanks for doing all that research. It is fascinating.

    The Serenity Prayer was always my favorite prayer when I was a Christian.
    I did not abandon these sentiments when I became Atheist – indeed saw my Atheism as an answer to its prayer! (ironically).

    And so I fashioned for myself an even more meaningful
    Atheistic version:

    “I shall seek
    the serenity to accept those things I cannot change,
    Courage to change the things I can
    And the wisdom to know the difference.”
    – Atheist Max
    (With dutiful credit to Reinhold Niebuhr)

  2. Kudos to Fred Shapiro for all this work, for making a fair and evidence based statement in 2008, and for having the integrity to be open about correcting it (again based on the evidence), today.

    What a great demonstration of hard work and honesty!

    To me, this shows again how, when we base conclusions on evidence, disagreements can simply be solved instead of becoming personal attacks.

    And, Atheist Max – thanks for that too – Love it!

  3. Excellent work Mr. Shapiro. Who knew there could be that much history to this?
    I had no idea that existed. Sounds like a great place to surf the web.

    And yes, ATHEIST MAX, your version is better….much!

  4. It’s funny that as an athiest you edited God out of a prayer! What you miss out on is the “gift” from God to do these things. Of course you don’t think that you need someone that doesn’t exist, but RN knew in the depths of his being that he needed God’s help, and that it was God who granted him the ability to do these things. Don’t want to start a debate. Just thought it was ironic.

  5. ‘And when we were wrong, promptly admitted it’ Mr. Shapiro certainly does this with his followup article. The cartoon strip “Calvin and Hobbes” does a take on the prayer thusly – “The strength to change what I can, the inability to accept what I can’t, and the incapacity to tell the difference.” Peace.

  6. God was never really there anyway. It is delusional.
    We never had a choice about it.
    We have to get by without God – because we always have.

  7. Not to depreciate any efforts to trace the origin of creative genius … I’m certain that even Niebuhr, himself, would agree: Any statement that bears intrinsic truth is Anonymous by nature. It’s true authorship is always divine and cannot be possessed nor claimed as original. We are but the conduit through which genius flows.

    I’m reminded of the native american’s comment. “The white man is crazy … he thinks he can own the land.”

  8. Not to mention the sentiment has been expressed and written for two thousand years by Greeks, Buddhists, Hebrews, etc.

  9. I have always felt the sentiments expressed in the Serenity Prayer (the first part only) offers a valuable insight and try to incorporate it in my approach to living. It is not a prayer for me, I am not an advocate of theism. Attempting to ascribe authorship to wisdom, can easily become the trees, that obscures the forest. Is it a valid observation or prospective? For me, that is the important question. I happen to like Mother Goose’s version the best.

    For every ailment under the sun
    There is a remedy, or there is none;
    If there be one, try to find it;
    If there be none, never mind it.

    And yes, the white man is crazy… he thinks he can own god.

  10. I like this version. It has a greater explanatory power;

    I seek

    the serenity to accept what I cannot change;

    the courage to change what I can;

    and the wisdom to know the difference.

    The Twelve Steps process can be described as a quest for effective power and control. Control is not a dirty word. The problem is when we keep trying to control what we have no business controlling.

    So, despite the name it is generally known by (“Serenity Prayer”), this quest is not just about Serenity. It is also about Courage and Wisdom. This quest is not just about learning to let go and learning courage. It is about knowing when to fight for change, and when to learn to live with what is.

    It wouldn’t accept the whole thing so… you will have to choose to link to it.

Leave a Comment