Mastodon

The cross on Mount Soledad can stay -- for now

(RNS) Both sides in a ongoing legal controversy over a cross on public land in San Diego will have to wait some more.
The cross on Mount Soledad can stay — for now
The Mount Soledad cross was installed on public land in San Diego in 1954.

(RNS) The decades-long battle over a cross erected on public land in California will drag out even longer now that the Supreme Court declined Monday (June 30) to hear the case.

The Mt. Soledad cross was installed in 1954. It rises 29 feet and its arms span 12 feet.

The Mount Soledad cross was installed on public land in San Diego in 1954.

In the last full day of the current session, the court said the case must first go to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before the high court will consider it.


The conflict in Mount Soledad Memorial Association v. Trunk, is over a 43-foot cross that sits atop Mount Soledad on public land in San Diego. The cross was erected in the 1950s and has since become a veterans’ memorial.

A veterans group that maintains the cross asked the Supreme Court to let it leapfrog over the 9th Circuit after a lower federal court ruled last December that the cross should come down.

But Justice Samuel Alito, who also issued two majority decisions for the court on Monday, said the Supreme Court would wait for another ruling in this case.

“The Court of Appeals has not yet reviewed (the lower court’s decision) on appeal,” Alito wrote. “Any review by this Court can await the decision of the Court of Appeals.”

The Mount Soledad cross has a long history of legal wrangling. The first challenge came in 1989, before the land surrounding it became a veterans’ memorial.

In December, a federal court in San Diego ruled the cross should come down because it violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and promotes one religion — Christianity — over others. But the same court granted a stay, allowing the cross to remain until the veterans had a chance to appeal.

The decision by the Supreme Court to send the case back to a lower court could mean the case will last at least another two to three years.


YS/AMB END WINSTON

No paywalls here. Thanks to you.
As an independent nonprofit, RNS believes everyone should have access to coverage of religion that is fair, thoughtful and inclusive. That's why you will never hit a paywall on our site; you can read all the stories and columns you want, free of charge (and we hope you read a lot of them!)

But, of course, producing this journalism carries a high cost, to support the reporters, editors, columnists, and the behind-the-scenes staff that keep this site up and running. That's why we ask that if you can, you consider becoming one of our donors. Any amount helps, and because we're a nonprofit, all of it goes to support our mission: To produce thoughtful, factual coverage of religion that helps you better understand the world. Thank you for reading and supporting RNS.
Deborah Caldwell, CEO and Publisher
Donate today