Richard Dawkins. Photo courtesy of Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science

'Royal wedding' of atheist group, Richard Dawkins Foundation launches woman to top post

Richard Dawkins. Photo courtesy of Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science

Richard Dawkins. Photo courtesy of Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

(RNS) It's like a royal wedding in the small world of atheist organizations: The Center for Inquiry and the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science are merging to form the largest reason-based organization in the U.S.

The new organization will retain the Center for Inquiry name, while giving a seat on its board to Richard Dawkins, the British evolutionary biologist who is a superstar in the atheist community for his best-selling books on atheism and science and his outspoken talks against religion.

As part of the merger, Ron Lindsay, a lawyer who has headed CFI since 2008 -- and shepherded the Amherst, N.Y.-based organization through a difficult and controversial transition from its founder, humanist philosopher Paul Kurtz -- will step down. Taking his spot will be Robyn Blumner, the Dawkins Foundation's executive director for the past two years.

"I hope and I believe that this merger will significantly enhance the impact of CFI's work, and, as a result, will also further some of the common goals of the secular movement, such as keeping religion out of public policy and reducing the stigma associated with being an atheist or humanist, which is still all too prevalent in the United States," Lindsay said in an email interview.

Blumner, who is based in Washington, D.C., said in a statement: “Secularism is on the ascendency in the United States and beyond. Science has proven to be the engine of human progress. Bringing more resources and ambition to promoting these forces of reason is what this merger is about.”

It is not clear yet how the merger will affect the British branch of the Richard Dawkins Foundation, which operates a separate entity, Lindsay said. CFI, meanwhile, has 21 international branches or representatives, from Canada to Pakistan to Zambia, giving the Dawkins Foundation a more international scope.

RELATED STORY: Richard Dawkins stands by remarks on sexism, pedophilia and Down syndrome

Robyn Blumner, new CEO of the Center for Inquiry. Photo courtesy of Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science

Robyn Blumner, new CEO of the Center for Inquiry. Photo courtesy of Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science

 This image is available for web publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

Dawkins, 74, has lent his name and fortune to projects throughout the atheist community, including science education programs and a push to encourage atheists and other nonbelievers to "come out" as such.

His 2006 book, "The God Delusion," ranked in the Top 10 of New York Times best-sellers that year and sold more than $3 million in copies. He has appeared in movies and television shows and is a frequent speaker at atheist, science and reason gatherings in the U.S. and abroad.

In addition to his celebrity, he brings a good bit of cash to CFI. It has a $5.2 million budget for 2016 and 41 employees, according to numbers supplied by CFI before the merger. In addition to its focus on secularism, CFI has programs on human rights, freedom of expression and the advancement of science. The Dawkins Foundation will bring in an additional $1.3 million to $1.5 million and three employees, a CFI spokesman said.

If the Dawkins Foundation brings assets, it also bring potential liabilities. Dawkins has made headlines in recent years with provocative remarks about women, Muslims and date rape. He is particularly prolific and controversial on Twitter, where he has 1.3 million followers.

"There are going to be occasions and events where Professor Dawkins expressly represents CFI, and we'll be proud to have him do so, as he's one of the most skilled communicators of science and secularism of our time," said Paul Fidalgo, director of communications for CFI.

"He's also his own person, and just like everyone else associated with or employed by CFI, he can and will speak for himself on occasion," Fidalgo added, "and not necessarily for CFI."

RELATED STORY: Richard Dawkins: Atheism's asset or liability?

The news came as a surprise to many within and outside of organized atheism. There are approximately 20 atheist, humanist and other secularist organizations, all of which have rubbed elbows or collaborated with the Dawkins Foundation in the past. Why did Dawkins take his celebrity and fortune to CFI instead of the American Humanist Association, American Atheists or the Freedom From Religion Foundation, some of which have given him awards in the past?

"I think it is the science angle" at CFI, said Ryan Cragun, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Tampa who is working on a book about atheist and secular organizations. "Dawkins knows CFI is going to be around for a long time, they have resources in place to support his interest in science and reason. It makes sense to go with CFI."

Todd Stiefel, founder and president of Stiefel Freethought Foundation, speaks to journalists during the 2014 Religion Newswriters Association conference in Decatur, Ga., on Sept. 20, 2014. Religion News Service photo by Sally Morrow

Todd Stiefel, founder and president of the Stiefel Freethought Foundation, speaks to journalists during the Religion Newswriters Association conference in Decatur, Ga., on Sept. 20, 2014. Religion News Service photo by Sally Morrow

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

Todd Stiefel, whose Openly Secular organization is a project of the Richard Dawkins Foundation, hailed the merger.

"CFI is doing more on the skeptic side and the humanism side and legal side," he said. "RDF is a much younger, smaller organization but is doing really well in science education and discrimination (against atheists). CFI has some of that, but this can really benefit both teams."

Writing on his Friendly Atheist blog, Hemant Mehta described the merger as "a win-win" situation and said it would make Blumner "one of the most powerful women in the world of organized atheism."

"It's worth celebrating," he said.

(Kimberly Winston is a national correspondent for RNS)






  1. I wish you all luck overcoming your inherent offense from ideas you don’t agree with.

  2. Try reading from Delusions:101, and find all religious claims are false.
    Which is a good start for dealing with reality.

  3. I love being an atheist.

    I’m happy, healthy and don’t need a religious belief to find purpose in existence. People in many countries are hostile to atheists. We are being killed in India and Bangladesh as late as a few months ago. Not for preaching anti-theism… Just for living as godless monsters… Eating cake without thanking one of the 2,800 gods we humans worship. I read a story recently about a man shot by a women in the United States of America just for not ‘believing in jesus’. How crazy is that?!

    It isn’t easy, this area in particular has a lot of people like Be Brave above, who feel like my quiet non-belief is somehow an attempt to specifically destroy them.

    Atheists don’t theists. We feel as sorry for you as you feel for us.

    I always found it a little sad… Why are they so insecure? Is their belief system that fragile? Are they afraid some reality might seep in if they let their guard down? Who knows…. who cares….

    I’m going to have some cake and…

  4. The only thing atheist have in common is not currently being convinced that a god exists. If you want to roll humanism and a litany of other positions into it you do so fallaciously.

  5. 1) You, nor I, can speak for all atheists. Your generalizing shows an inherant intellectual weakness. You may wish to look into that. Given how religions generally teach delusional (denial of reality, promotion of fantasy) thinking patterns to children as their minds are developing (child abuse IMO), I don’t have much hope that you will.

    2) I can say with confidence that the vast majority of atheists, such as myself, don’t hate Christians. We certainly don’t hunt them down with machetes or give them death sentences as is normal treatment for atheists in other countries.

    Indeed it seems you are the one who hates an entire group of people, most of whom you have not met. I wonder why you hate people you have not met?

  6. That’s exceptionally lame.

    If people are unable to believe that life on earth could have developed via evolution, how can they possibly believe that an infinitely more intelligent, skilled, and powerful God suddenly appeared from nowhere or through a form of evolution?

  7. As I’ve said before:

    Some believers respect atheists & their beliefs. Other believers don’t.
    Some atheists respect believers & their beliefs. Other atheists don’t.
    Isn’t it amazing how much we have in common?

    Thanks to all those commenters who so boldly illustrate my point whilst demonstrating such solidarity over their shared values.

    And a big “Amen!” to the singularly wise, compassionate, and hopeful comment from Peace and love, man.

  8. Are you aware that Richard Dawkins doesn’t describe himself as an atheist?

  9. I’m sure you’re well aware that a person’s rejection of a description doesn’t invalidate that description’s applicability to that person.

    Of course, if he’s religious (or spiritual, for that matter), then he’s really got himself in a fine mess.

    But whatever his personal beliefs, what he says and does is utterly disrespectful to other people and their beliefs.

    It’s all about how we treat each other.

  10. Math and physics deal with real numbers, which are not objects of nature, and therefore must be false. How can a false thing create something true? Take a look at for many examples.

    Laws of nature are the only truth. Vedas talk about the following laws of nature: soul theory, yogic power, reincarnation, destiny, etc. There is no God in Vedas. If you look carefully you will find all of these laws are there in Bible also. Reincarnation was there in Bible, but was removed later. Destiny is clearly stated in Bible. Yogic power is also mentioned in Bible.

    There are two types of interpretations of all religions: Vedic interpretation and money power interpretation. Money power interpretation is the main stream interpretation – which says there is God, we are sinners, we have freewill, good and bad morality etc. Such things are inconsistent with destiny theory.

  11. IF not atheist. Then what title DOES he embrace?
    Thank you.

  12. “Antitheist”, if he’s honest. I imagine he embraces that term; it’s a perfect fit.

  13. Kurtz had nothing but contempt for Dawkins and his Zelots.

Leave a Comment