Mastodon

Why evangelicals didn't do it for Cruz in New Hampshire

It doesn't have to do with their numbers.
Why evangelicals didn’t do it for Cruz in New Hampshire
Seal of New Hampshire
Seal of New Hampshire

Seal of New Hampshire

If evangelicals in New Hampshire behaved like evangelicals in Iowa, Ted Cruz would be celebrating a second-place finish in the nation’s first primary this morning. But they don’t, and he isn’t.

Believe it or not, evangelicals are not a negligible segment of the GOP electorate in the Granite State. Yesterday they made up 25 percent of it, up three points from 2012. The problem for an evangelical paladin like Cruz is that they aren’t the kind of voting bloc they are in Iowa.


In 2008, New Hampshire evangelicals split their vote equally among Mike Huckabee, John McCain, and Mitt Romney (28-28-27), leaving Iowa-winner Huckabee to finish a poor third with 11 percent overall. In 2012, they went for Romney over Rick Santorum and Ron Paul (31-23-21), leaving Iowa-winner Santorum to finish a poorer fourth with 9.5 percent.

This year, again, evangelicals put their guy over the top in Iowa, preferring Cruz to Donald Trump by 12 points, but in New Hampshire they actually went for Trump over Cruz by four points, 27 percent to 23 percent. That 16-point swing was enough to shove Cruz out of a tie with John Kasich for second place and back into the pack with Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio.

For the past half-century, New Englanders have shunned faith-based politics, and New Hampshire evangelicals are no exception to the rule. It’s a rule that helps explain why there are so few Republicans left in the region.

No paywalls here. Thanks to you.
As an independent nonprofit, RNS believes everyone should have access to coverage of religion that is fair, thoughtful and inclusive. That's why you will never hit a paywall on our site; you can read all the stories and columns you want, free of charge (and we hope you read a lot of them!)

But, of course, producing this journalism carries a high cost, to support the reporters, editors, columnists, and the behind-the-scenes staff that keep this site up and running. That's why we ask that if you can, you consider becoming one of our donors. Any amount helps, and because we're a nonprofit, all of it goes to support our mission: To produce thoughtful, factual coverage of religion that helps you better understand the world. Thank you for reading and supporting RNS.
Deborah Caldwell, CEO and Publisher
Donate today