Rabbi Barry Freundel during morning prayers at Kesher Israel in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 10, 2014. Photo by Lloyd Wolf

Women suing 'Peeping Tom' rabbi want rabbinical court to pay, too

WASHINGTON (RNS) He spied on them when they were naked and now they want the rabbinical association that supervised him to pay -- literally.

A group of women videotaped as they prepared for a Jewish ritual bath, or mikvah, had filed a lawsuit in 2014 against Rabbi Barry Freundel, who is serving a 6 1/2-year jail sentence for 52 counts of voyeurism.

But lawyers for the women amended the class-action lawsuit Tuesday (Aug. 16) to add the Beth Din of America, the rabbinical court that oversaw Freundel, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

Aside from Freundel, other defendants already named in the lawsuit include: Kesher Israel, the synagogue Freundel led for 25 years; the Rabbinical Council of America, an association of Orthodox rabbis; and the National Capital Mikvah, the ritual bath Freundel helped found in the Georgetown section of Washington.

Members of Kesher Israel, a landmark Orthodox synagogue in the nation's capital, were devastated when news of their rabbi's spying on naked women came to light in 2014. The synagogue has been the spiritual home of Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and former U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut Independent.


READ: A year after 'Peeping Tom' rabbis arrest, his congregation perseveres


Freundel had hidden a camera in the changing area women use before immersing in the ritual bath, a monthly custom of observant Jewish married women, and a requirement for those seeking to convert to Judaism.

He had been known as an advocate for those seeking to convert.

Revelations-Series-Banner-770x150

Comments

  1. Has it been proven that it was the rabbi in person who placed that camera?

  2. Yes. He pleaded guilty to 52 counts of voyeurism in criminal court on the basis that he placed at least one camera in the mikvah. In fact, the prosecution had alleged that there were several cameras involved, including in a “safe house” he had obtained for a victim of domestic violence.

  3. Unless it can be shown conclusively that the Beth Din and the rabbinical council and the governing boards of the synagogue and mikvah KNEW that this Freundel schmuck had placed the cameras, they don’t need to be dragged through the courts.

  4. One of the videos he hid in a tissue box shows his face as he adjusts the camera. He placed the cameras, no one else did.

Leave a Comment