Mastodon

Trump's executive order religiously discriminatory, Appeals Court suggests

A trial on the merits is probably next.
Trump’s executive order religiously discriminatory, Appeals Court suggests
President Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C. Photo courtesy of Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Your executive order on immigration looks like a pathetic loser, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals told Donald Trump Thursday evening.

Upholding Federal District Judge James Robart’s temporary restraining order, the unanimous three-judge panel summarily dismissed the president’s claim that courts can’t review his exercise of power over who gets to enter the country.

There is no precedent to support this claimed unreviewability, which runs contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy,” the court declared. “[I]t is beyond question that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action.”


A bad high school student would understand that.

OK, I promise to refrain from Trumpian insults for the duration of this column.

The constitutional challenge the court found most likely to prevail in a trial on the merits concerned the executive order’s violation of the due process rights of those barred entry. But it also emphasized “the serious nature of the allegations the States have raised with respect to their religious discrimination claims.”

Never mind that the order doesn’t specifically mention Muslims and talks about “religious minorities” in the affected (majority-Muslim) countries rather than Christians: “It is well established that evidence of  purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection Clause claims.”

In other words, Trump’s expressed desire to ban Muslims and favor Christians is relevant to judging the claim that the executive order unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of religion. Hats off to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom for recognizing this.

What happens now is anyone’s guess. Mine is that the president’s tweet (“SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!”) tells the tale.

That is to say: A trip to the Supreme Court on the restraining order, a trial on the merits, and another trip to the Supreme Court for review.

And, God willing, the executive order will be ruled unconstitutional as the religiously discriminatory thing it is.


No paywalls here. Thanks to you.
As an independent nonprofit, RNS believes everyone should have access to coverage of religion that is fair, thoughtful and inclusive. That's why you will never hit a paywall on our site; you can read all the stories and columns you want, free of charge (and we hope you read a lot of them!)

But, of course, producing this journalism carries a high cost, to support the reporters, editors, columnists, and the behind-the-scenes staff that keep this site up and running. That's why we ask that if you can, you consider becoming one of our donors. Any amount helps, and because we're a nonprofit, all of it goes to support our mission: To produce thoughtful, factual coverage of religion that helps you better understand the world. Thank you for reading and supporting RNS.
Deborah Caldwell, CEO and Publisher
Donate today