Former White House Senior Adviser Steve Bannon, second from left, in the East Room at the White House on April 12, 2017, in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Steve Bannon's Judeo-Christianity

A few days ago, my estimable new RNS colleague Tom Reese put in a kind word for Steve Bannon, suggesting that the religious left will miss Trump's departed strategist because he alone in the White House shared the left's critique of global crony capitalism on the one hand and libertarian economics on the other.

Not that Reese gets carried away. Bannon's problem, he argues, is that he cannot recognize the role of  government regulation in assuring a more humane capitalist order.

No doubt. But that still may be too kind.

The evidence that Reese (like most other commentators) cites for Bannon's better economic angels is from a talk he Skyped into a meeting of the conservative Catholic Human Dignity Institute held at the Vatican in the summer of 2014:

So I think the discussion of, should we put a cap on wealth creation and distribution? It’s something that should be at the heart of every Christian that is a capitalist — “What is the purpose of whatever I’m doing with this wealth? What is the purpose of what I’m doing with the ability that God has given us, that divine providence has given us to actually be a creator of jobs and a creator of wealth?”

I think it really behooves all of us to really take a hard look and make sure that we are reinvesting that back into positive things. But also to make sure that we understand that we’re at the very beginning stages of a global conflict, and if we do not bind together as partners with others in other countries that this conflict is only going to metastasize.

Notice that there's no evidence of support for either government regulation of wealth or the kind of private charity customarily advocated by anti-welfare state types. The "positive things" capitalists should be "reinvesting" in, we know from Bannon's other work, is investment in economic activity at home.

Such "enlightened Capitalism" -- investment presumably undertaken voluntarily against pure bottom-line calculation -- he believes to be the result of Judeo-Christian values that have been under assault in the West for several decades.

Not that we, America, can go it alone. National "partners" are needed to defend what he habitually calls "the Judeo-Christian West." The latter is threatened from the inside by global elites and from the outside by "Islamic Fascism" and, even more, by Chinese-dominated East Asia.

Bannon's strategic vision thus consists of economic nationalism joined to a simplified version of Samuel Huntington's post-Cold War "clash of civilizations." As he told The Economist in a post-White House interview last week, "I want the world to look back in 100 years and say, their mercantilist, Confucian system lost. The Judeo-Christian liberal West won."

During the 1930s, "Judeo-Christian" came into American public discourse as a way of opposing Fascist anti-Semitism. After World War II, it became the watchword of an America standing for human freedoms against Communism.

With the rise of the religious right, it was transformed into a synonym for traditional sexual mores. In the Bannon-Breitbart world view, it has been reduced to the underpinnings of economic nationalism.

Call this the degradation of the Judeo-Christian dogma.

Comments

  1. Global conflict is fueled by Judeo-Christian dogma and belief that uses various interpretations of scripture
    to defend the just war argument. ‘Well, Jesus asked them to bring a sword…’ kind of argument. Coupled with a cherry picking of isolated examples of ‘defense’ from the New Testament we have in the Old Testament a whole narrative of war and mass slaughter that is deemed God inspired only because the true ideas in the NEW testament have been arbitrarily retrofitted to the false ideas in the OLD testament to give the appearance of being ‘holy’ and ‘divine’ in the character and personality of Christ.
    The word Judeo in the phrase Judeo Christian is another word for Crucify in this context of the Truth being married to the FALSE ideas about God as one canon.
    So whenever I hear Christians, Theologians, Politicians and Professors use this term Judeo-Christianity I cringe because it is a contradiction in terms thus ; Crucify-Christianity.

  2. Perhaps outside enemies are not the only ones who attack the Judeo-Christian West, history does as well. Look at the plight of the Jews before modern day Zionism and then before the creation of the state of Israel and then look at the plight of the Palestinians today. Look at the religious wars in Europe and then look at the imperialism and building of colonies by European nations. Look at the ethnic cleansing conducted in America and then look at the enslavement and harsh persecution of Blacks throughout American history.

    If what we descendants of European Jews and Christians do defines Judeo-Christian dogma and values, then we need to be challenged. But we need to be challenged through attempts at persuasion, not violence.

  3. It seems to many that Christians are the enemies of Judeo-Christianity, an interesting civic, that is, secular version of religion.

  4. I really like Thomas Reese, but with types like Bannon, their “Christianity” is just a cultural; marker. There’s no positive content to it. Think Northern Ireland or or Lebanon during the 1980s civil war with its “Christian” and “Druse” militias.

  5. in the christian dominionist model they plant dominionists in all govt positions as they have done with divos and sessions etc. and during the take over all the treasury money goes into one pot and our new messiah, Bannon or Cruz, gets to dole it out at will. they take god’s command in genesis to ‘take dominion over the earth’ literally.

Leave a Comment