News

RNS best of 2017: In the Capitol’s shadow, Museum of the Bible readies for opening

View of U.S. Capitol from the Museum of the Bible. RNS photo by Adelle M. Banks

EDITORS’ NOTE: As the year draws to a close, it’s a time of reflection. This week, Religion News Service is proud to highlight several top stories by our staff, including this November preview of the Museum of the Bible.

WASHINGTON (RNS) — In the new Museum of the Bible is a room full of Bibles, color-coded to show the more than 2,000 languages into which the holy book has been at least partially translated — and the similar number for which translation has “not yet begun.”

That exhibit is just one example of how the 430,000-square-foot building with a view of the U.S. Capitol is meant to fascinate, educate and — depending on your perspective — evangelize.

“You could certainly interpret it that way,” said Museum of the Bible President Cary Summers of the language-related exhibit in an interview shortly before the museum’s Friday (Nov. 17) opening.

Some may see the exhibit as a visual depiction of the Bible’s growing influence over time, and others as a demonstration of the potential for spreading its message further. “We’ve never viewed it as evangelical outreach at all. It’s just part of the history of the Bible. And we’re showing it in this great way.”

Since the nonprofit behind the museum was established in 2010, officials have shifted from their original mission “to inspire confidence in the absolute authority and reliability of the Bible” to one that’s become “nonsectarian” and aimed at welcoming people of all faiths and none.

Strategically placed near the National Mall, a collection of monuments and museums dedicated to the country’s civic ideals, this museum is focused on religious ideals. Its success will, perhaps more than that of other museums, depend on the eye of the beholder. Visitors who swipe its high-tech screens or eat in its Manna restaurant will judge its contents from their own perspectives — religious, Christian or evangelical, or none of the above.

The museum opens amid controversy around its message and its primary funders, Steve Green and his evangelical family, which also run the Hobby Lobby craft store business that three years ago won a much-debated court case giving it an exemption from the contraception mandate of the Affordable Care Act. Hobby Lobby recently reached a legal settlement over some of its acquisition of artifacts.

Separately, museum officials say they have responded to critics about the museum’s planned contents and language, adding nuance to signage and switching out artifacts to include a wider representation of cultures drawn to the Bible.

A tour

The museum’s front entrance features a gateway with two 40-foot brass replicas of the Book of Genesis as it appeared in the Gutenberg Bible, the version that first brought the holy book to the masses in the 1400s. Just beyond these panels is a glass vestibule featuring an artistic rendering of Psalm 19 (“The heavens declare the glory of God”), inspired by the Bodmer Papyri fragment that is one of the oldest artifacts in the museum’s collection.

The spacious lobby — its wall etched with “Thy word is a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path” — features a 140-foot-long digital ceiling with revolving images of landscapes, stained glass and items from the permanent collection.

Museum staffers will offer visitors heading to the three floors of central exhibits tabletlike digital guides to help them plan their trek based on their personal interests and the amount of time they have to spend in the museum that took three years and $500 million to build. Though the Green family contributed the bulk of the funding, smaller financial gifts have come from schoolchildren sending in a dollar a month as well as Catholics, Jews and atheists, Summers said.

Admission is free but donations are suggested. The museum is offering timed-entry passes but visitors can also attempt to enter without them.

Just above the lobby, the “Impact of the Bible” floor highlights how Scriptures have influenced cultures across the globe — from education and literature to art and architecture. A Bible owned by Elvis Presley is just steps away from mannequins adorned with dresses by fashion designers such as Dolce and Gabbana, who have featured icons of Mary in their luxury brand.

“Secular audiences will be surprised at the influence of the Bible” on many aspects of popular culture, said Seth Pollinger, director of museum content.

The eight-floor museum will display around 1,600 items in its permanent exhibits — about three-quarters of them Bibles and biblical manuscripts. It also will feature separate temporary exhibitions of collections of the Israel Antiquities Authority, the Bible Lands Museum in Jerusalem and the Vatican.

Israeli officials are expected to join dignitaries ranging from congressional chaplains to Catholic bishops for a private ribbon-cutting ceremony Friday two blocks from the National Mall. The museum is set to open to the public the next day.

Questionable acquisitions

Despite the fanfare, the museum opens in the shadow of a recent Justice Department settlement in which the Hobby Lobby company paid $3 million and returned 5,500 artifacts that were illegally imported from Iraq.

Museum of the Bible officials have tried to distance themselves from the controversy, saying the museum “was not a party to either the investigation or the settlement.”

Noting that the artifacts in question included cuneiform tablets and not Bibles, David Trobisch, the museum’s director of collections, said that nevertheless there was fallout for the museum.

“It still did affect us because we had a display where we wanted to show the development of writing, and the different tools that are developed,” he said at a gathering with reporters in October. Museum officials had to ask partners to loan them items to complete the exhibit.

But beyond the countless Bibles and fragments on display, much of the museum seems more Disney-like than scholarly. There are videos interspersed between artifacts and touch screens and a sound booth where people can write and speak of their own experience with the Bible.

Visitors can snack in the Milk and Honey cafe, sit in a 472-seat theater where the Broadway musical “Amazing Grace” will begin its national tour, or take a 4-D ride that will give them the sensation of flying over Washington and viewing its buildings that contain biblical texts.

In the “children’s experience” area, young visitors will be able to pretend to slay Goliath with a slingshot or fish with Peter, helping him fill his boat after Jesus told him to let his nets down again.

On the “Narrative of the Bible” floor, there is an area that looks like a movie-set re-creation of how the village of Nazareth might have appeared in Jesus’ time, including a family dinner table filled with bread and beans and a mikvah used for ritual cleansing. Costumed docents will talk about Jesus, but the museum has decided to generally avoid portraying him physically, Pollinger said, “because it’s just not an issue that we want to solve or take a position on.”

The museum does take on numerous conflicts over faith, from a display of Bible-based arguments for and against slavery to a desecrated 1800s Torah scroll that was turned into shoe inserts in the next century.

It also addresses debates about whether the Bible and science are “mutually exclusive”: “There is broad agreement today among historians that modern science owes a great deal to the biblical worldview,” reads a sign near a sculpture of astronomer and physicist Isaac Newton holding a compass. “The idea that the natural world is orderly springs from the Bible.”

Answering the critics

Citing the recent legal action, the 8,500-member Society of Biblical Literature issued a statement prior to the opening urging museum officials to operate with “transparency and ongoing openness to review and analysis by scholarly peers.”

Summers responded that the museum has done just that: More than 100 scholars have weighed in on aspects of the museum’s plans and content.

Some have commented by email, drafting language in the exhibits, correcting typos — B.C. vs. A.D., for example — or adding explanations, such as one about the importance of the history of ownership of artifacts. Museum staffers also made a change to an art section, adding a contemporary black Madonna painting after they were criticized for not being more inclusive.

One of the key areas in the “History of the Bible” floor is a section on the Dead Sea Scrolls. Pollinger escorted Robert Cargill, incoming editor of Biblical Archaeology Review, through the museum and said he “enriched” how the museum deals with questions about the authenticity of their scroll fragments.

“Because that is an intense discussion now, we wanted to upgrade our signage to be able to discuss how it is that you can tell some of these different clues about potential forgeries,” Pollinger said. “We wanted to make it really an educational opportunity rather than defending whether something is real or not.”

Cargill, an assistant professor of Judaism and Christianity at the University of Iowa, said most museums wouldn’t display any item whose authenticity is in question.

“If there’s any doubt of whether something’s a forgery, you don’t put it out there,” he said. “They’re still going to be criticized for that and that’s just a decision they’ve got to live with.”

Both Cargill and Christopher Rollston, a George Washington University professor and a member of the SBL’s governing council, say they believe the museum officials have heard their concerns and have made at least some of the changes they recommended.

Though there are Scripture-affirming banners, such as one that quotes a verse in 2 Timothy (“All Scripture is inspired by God”), Pollinger said curators squeezed “multiple views” about the origins and timing of the Bible within the 60-word limit of some signage.

“We do acknowledge that some think that God revealed the Torah to Moses,” he said, “but we will say scholars do not agree when different parts were first written down.”

Seth Pollinger, director of museum content, speaks to reporters at the Museum of the Bible on Oct. 17, 2017. To his right is Cary Summers, president of the Museum of the Bible. RNS photo by Adelle M. Banks

But Pollinger also said he looks forward to the expansion of the “illumiNations” exhibit that shows the languages in which the Bible has been, and has yet to be, written down. He hopes it will be “like the Library of Congress for translations” as more are completed and samples are displayed there.

Rollston said that the exhibit, as with other displays in the museum, will inevitably be interpreted through the lens of whoever is viewing the museum’s offerings.

“I think with a lot of the things that are on display, they often navigate sort of a middle way,” he said, “without saying some things that might disappoint or disturb certain constituencies on both sides, left and right.”

(RNS has a board member who is also on the leadership staff of the Museum of the Bible. RNS board members had no involvement in this story.)

About the author

Adelle M. Banks

Adelle M. Banks, production editor and a national reporter, joined RNS in 1995. An award-winning journalist, she previously was the religion reporter at the Orlando Sentinel and a reporter at The Providence Journal and newspapers in the upstate New York communities of Syracuse and Binghamton.

36 Comments

Click here to post a comment

  • “But Pollinger also said he looks forward to the expansion of the “illumiNations” exhibit that shows the languages in which the Bible has been, and has yet to be, written down.

    Spooky.

    “Let no man deceive you by any means, for that Day shall not come, unless there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition….” 2 Thess 2:3

  • A light, almost populist, approach to making the history of the bible more accessible to the less scholarly inclined.

  • Hello Adelle,

    Thanks for your report, but could you also include the metric equivalents for your measurements?

    For example, the area of the display, at 430,000 square feet, is almost 4 hectares, the 40 foot brass replicas of the Book of Genesis are a little over 12 meters high, the 140 foot ceiling is about 42.67 meters long.

    Almost all the rest of the world uses these measurements, so it would he a courtesy to your international readers to include metric measurements as a matter of course.

  • ‘“There is broad agreement today among historians that modern science
    owes a great deal to the biblical worldview,” reads a sign near a
    sculpture of astronomer and physicist Isaac Newton holding a compass.
    “The idea that the natural world is orderly springs from the Bible.”’

    I guess they never heard of the Greeks.

  • ““If there’s any doubt of whether something’s a forgery, you don’t put it out there,” he said. ”

    They may not want to display the New Testament as the copies and additions are probably not authentic.

  • Informative article on the Bible Museum. The Bible, the most important collection of books ever written, about the Messiah-Savior historical Jesus, who came to rescue from sins each individual who receives Jesus into his/her life as in Luke 19:10.

  • “…modern science owes a great deal to the biblical worldview,”

    Judaism did present a universe based on physical laws that govern natural forces (albeit often manipulated by the capricious Yahweh). Regarding astronomy it rejected the notion of heavenly bodies as sources of divination and condemed astrology.

  • Take the American Grand Slam Christian vacation: the Creation Museum, the Noah’s Ark exhibit and then the Museum of the Bible.

  • This is disgusting – to still be building memorials to stone aged belief systems of mythology, and acting as though they are truths??

  • $500 million…..could have fed how many people?

    Look..if someone has “confidence in the absolute authority and reliability of the Bible” they do so on faith…no museum is going to persuade them. Those of us who have studied the Bible closely and found it to not be so reliable are likely not going to find new info at a museum like this.

  • not to mention positing the earth was a flat disc over which hung a huge dome that kept water out and had lights attached to the ceiling (see Firmament).

  • orrr.people could take free online courses in Bible history and we could spend $500 million in s more constructive manner. Just offering that up…

  • Thank you TheMountainHumanist for your comment. Documenting eras down through the Bible’s progressive historical development, a few key descriptions demonstrate the preservation of accurate historical experiences of the many people, i.e. Deuteronomy 17:15, 18-20; Ezra 7:9-12; Luke 1:1-4; John 20:30-31. Thank you for taking the time to check out these references to careful documentations of history. Have a great day. Jesus loves you & so do I! 😉

  • Thank you David Hume for your comment. The Gospels were written by eyewitnesses accounts in the midst of heated public debates (Luke 1:1-4; Acts 2:13, 36-37; 3:11-4:23; 6:8-10; 7:54, 57-58). 1,500 years of copying manuscripts throughout most parts of the world has preserved its complete accuracy as shown in UBSGNT & Novum Testamentum Graece Nestle-Aland and explained by top Textual Critic expert Prof. Daniel B. Wallace of the Center For The Study Of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM). David Hume, Jesus loves you & so do I! 😉

  • Thanks for the well wishes..may you also be well.

    I totally agree…the Bible has some accurate history –as do most ancient religions/legends.

    But if your logic holds…any book that has some correct info..must therefore have all correct info?

    We also have evidence that the Bible gets some history wrong…Luke is a good example as the author — writing decades later — had some facts wrong about Roman census practices and the role of Quirinius

  • I think you would agree that in a free society people have the right to direct their surplus wealth in any legally legitimate matter they choose. One may view such acts as both useless and wasteful, but that is often in the subjective eye of the beholder.

  • I respectfully disagree. None of the Gospels were written by eyewitnesses. The Gospel of Mark has two endings, one added by another unknown source, so copying is not completely accurate. I refer you to the scholarly works of Bart Ehrman.

  • That is a values judgment that each person has to square with their own conscience. Largely in this country we are not in the habit of dictating to people what they may do with their own resources. It is a virtue of our Republic. We may always endeavor to persuade if we so choose, but in a pluralistic society the question of “should” is often subjective in substance. I defer to Adam Smith and the principles of economics he espoused.

  • Thank you TheMountainHumanist for your thoughtful reply. For sake of convenience I conflate two references that illustrate the meticulous detail expected of the writers-scholars of the earlier history. As you already read, Deuteronomy 17:18-20 specifies oversight approval of the accuracy of copying Moses’ Law for the next generation by a team of writers-scholars. Whereas Deuteronomy 4:2 warns against modifications of the texts by those scholars, or anyone else, for that matter.
    Concerning Dr. Luke’s alleged historical errors during the time of Quirinius, take a closer look, please. Since “governor” is a very general term for “ruler,” Quirinius was the administrator of the census. Also note, αὕτη ἀπογραφὴ πρώτη ἐγένετο ἡγεμονεύοντος τῆς ΣυρίαςΚυρηνίου. I have underlined the word usually translated “first,” in this case better translated “before,” which also clears up misunderstandings.
    Dr. Luke was researching and writing several years after the conversion of Saul of Tarsus (Apostle Paul), around the year A.D. 46 as noted in the grammatical change of Acts of the Apostles 16:10-17; 20:5-21:18.
    I encourage you to receive Jesus Christ into your life! TheMountainHumanist, I wish you the very best for today, because Jesus loves you and so do I!

  • David Hume, thank you for your courtesy. I respectfully submit to you historical statements for your ruminations. Matthew Levi was a Tax Collector (Luke 5:27-29) who worked with a large number of other tax collectors documenting individuals, taxes, towns, and dates for the Roman Government. Matthew documented numerous experiences of eyewitnesses of Jesus of Nazareth as they travelled from town to town. Mark’s Gospel originally ended at 16:8 because Matthew’s Gospel already had a well-established resurrection appearances ending answering the skepticisms of the Jewish community, especially the Jewish leaders. Resurrection appearances endings were added to Mark’s Gospel a little later. Jesus of Nazareth was a Rabbi who trained his disciples in repetitions of experiences with extremely high moral standards. Their stories remained consistent and accurate over the many decades of repetitions and numerous documentations during, and after Jesus’ time. Ehrman and Prof. Daniel B. Wallace publicly debated this issue: Debate – Ehrman vs Wallace Feb 01, 2012 UNC. David Hume you may see this entire professional debate on YouTube. As noted in the Q & A session, Ehrman had to correct some of his erroneous views. I encourage you to receive Jesus Christ into your life, David Hume. David Hume, I wish you the very best for today because Jesus loves you and so do I!

  • Thank you, again, TheMountainHumanist for your reply to me. You claim Luke was written by an anonymous, later author, but you cited no historical evidence for your claim. Surely you have noticed that I cited historical and grammatical evidences for Luke’s authorship to David Hume as: The Gospels were written by eyewitnesses accounts in the midst of heated public debates in Luke 1:1-4; Acts 2:13, 36-37; 3:11-4:23; 6:8-10; 7:54, 57-58. So, in the spirit of historical documentations, I cite additional historical evidences for your cogitations. Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.4.6, says Luke was by race an Antiochian and a physician by profession. Luke’s Gospel was received as having apostolic endorsement and authority from Apostle Paul, as they traveled together for some time, then received by the widely diverse churches during Paul’s time. TheMountainHumanist, I request from you the historical documentations that Dr. Luke was not the author of Luke’s Gospel. Again, TheMountainHumanist, I encourage you to receive the historical Jesus Christ into your life. Have a great day today!

  • The author is not named in either volume. According to a Church tradition dating from the 2nd century, he was the Luke named as a companion of Paul in three of the letters attributed to Paul himself, but “a critical consensus emphasizes the countless contradictions between the account in Acts and the authentic Pauline letters.”

    Burkett, Delbert (2002). An introduction to the New Testament and the origins of Christianity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00720-7.

    Carroll, John T. (2012). Luke: A Commentary. Westminster John Knox Press.

  • Thank you TheMountainHumanist for citing your historical references. You are correct that Paul cites Dr. Luke in three of his letters. This establishes the early historical authorship of Luke’s Gospel on the authority of Paul and received by the widely diverse churches as authentic. For each person willing, Jesus will come into our life and cleanse us from our sins. Have a great day TheMountainHumanist!

  • We’ll have to agree to disagree. We can all agree that we wouldn’t want our daughters to visit Roy Moore’s annual pool party..amen?

  • Yes, we can agree to disagree. Thank you, TheMountainHumanist, for your courtesy. I second your Amen concerning Roy Moore’s indiscretions. If he already belongs to Jesus Christ, as some reports indicate, then Jesus needs to be Lord of that part of his life as well. TheMountainHumanist, I have enjoyed our dialog. See ya next time.

ADVERTISEMENTs