Mastodon

A Four-Star Trek

I've loved these characters all my life. I "have been, and always shall be," their friend. And I loved the new Trek installment. (And no, this post is not really relevant to religion.)
A Four-Star Trek
Opening day! And it's quite a ride. (Film poster courtesy of startrekmovie.com.)
Opening day! And this adventure is quite a ride. (Film poster courtesy of startrekmovie.com.)

Opening day! And this adventure is quite a ride. (Film poster courtesy of startrekmovie.com.)

Why is a religion blogger writing about Star Trek: Into Darkness? Some options:

a) Doing so makes it imperative that I see the movie on opening day and call it “work.”

b) Writing about the film makes my ticket tax-deductible. (Not sure if this also applies to the popcorn.)

c) I needed to burnish my geek cred.

d) Star Trek is, um, totally relevant to religion. There’s even a whole book about it.

e) All of the above.

Yeah, OK, so this is only marginally related to religion news, but . . . lighten up, people. It’s Star Trek! And I’ve waited four long years since the last movie!


I like my action movies to have an actual story with characters I care about. I’m weird that way. And in that respect, Into Darkness more than delivers. When last we saw the newly minted Captain James Tiberius Kirk, he was a cocky but brilliant young gun assembling a crack shot team of other young guns. In the opening scenes of the new movie (no spoilers . . .) that cockiness does not serve him well. One underlying theme of the movie is Kirk’s being taken down a peg and learning to trust — and be challenged by — the people around him. It’s about teamwork and sacrifice and all those other great action flick ideals.

The supporting actors give it their all, but the movie is completely stolen by Benedict Cumberbatch as a villain who will be familiar (and yet not familiar) to longtime fans of the series. He was born for this part. He billows so well. Remember last year when I criticized the new Sherlock Holmes series on BBC for making the character of Sherlock too dark? I may have been wrong about that, but I sensed in the Holmes remake that too little separated Holmes from Moriarty. All that darkness and acedia afflicted both characters, not just Holmes’s archnemesis. But perhaps I perceived this not because of the script so much as the way Cumberbatch approaches the role.

Whatever he does, it works here in spades. It’s hard to take your eyes off the man. He puts the eeeeeeee in eeeeeeeevil.

Reviews of Into the Darkness have been mostly positive so far; right now Rotten Tomatoes has aggregated the critical reviews as being 86% in favor. It’s not a perfect movie, but it’s a great homage to the series (check out its reversal of one of the most touching and memorable Kirk-Spock scenes in Star Trek history) and a whole lot of fun. I mean, I would pay money to hear Bones say the requisite “I’m a doctor, not a __” again, or to hear Capt. Kirk order Bones to stop speaking in metaphors.

I’ve loved these characters all my life. I “have been, and always shall be,” their friend. And I am pleased.

No paywalls here. Thanks to you.
As an independent nonprofit, RNS believes everyone should have access to coverage of religion that is fair, thoughtful and inclusive. That's why you will never hit a paywall on our site; you can read all the stories and columns you want, free of charge (and we hope you read a lot of them!)

But, of course, producing this journalism carries a high cost, to support the reporters, editors, columnists, and the behind-the-scenes staff that keep this site up and running. That's why we ask that if you can, you consider becoming one of our donors. Any amount helps, and because we're a nonprofit, all of it goes to support our mission: To produce thoughtful, factual coverage of religion that helps you better understand the world. Thank you for reading and supporting RNS.
Deborah Caldwell, CEO and Publisher
Donate today