Beliefs Culture Election Ethics Faith Government & Politics Institutions Jonathan Merritt: On Faith and Culture Law & Court Legislation Opinion Politics Race & Ethnicity

Welcome to the Trump era. Hold onto your hope.

Image courtesy of Gage Skidmore via Flickr (http://bit.ly/2jCgfW3)

Tomorrow at noon, Donald J. Trump will become the 45th President of the United States of America. Depending on your political persuasion, reading that line either stirs your sense of hope or saps it.

Enter Michael Wear, a former Obama White House staffer who directed the outgoing president’s faith outreach during his 2012 reelection campaign. Wear has just written a sobering book, “Reclaiming Hope: Lessons Learned in the Obama White House About the Future of Faith in America.” It contains a messages for all Americans, whether you believe that the incoming president poses a threat to America’s greatness or will truly make us “great again.”

Here, Wear and I discuss whether Obama’s “hope and change” promised failed, how pro-Trump Americans should check their sense of hope, and why anti-Trumpers have reasons to keep hope alive in this new age. He explains why all Americans have reason to hope no matter who they voted for last November.

RNS: Let’s begin at the beginning. Define “hope” for us succinctly.

MW: Hope has been misused and undermined for personal and political purposes so often that it is important to sort of excavate hope amidst the rubble, to reclaim it. Clearly, hope is generally accepted today as a kind of wishing, a kind of desiring for some perceived good. What I am concerned with is which hopes are justified. We can hope for all kinds of things, but if hope is not in a secure place, what we hope for will ultimately lead to disappointment.

Real hope is a confidence in a God who wills our good that opens our eyes to possibilities that would otherwise be closed off without that hope. As I write in the book, “Christian hope is both individual and corporate, personal and universal. It is a hope that reaches across time, from the past to eternity without skipping over this very present moment in our lives.”

Image courtesy of Thomas Nelson

Image courtesy of Thomas Nelson

RNS: Should Christians even place their hope in the public square or individual politicians?

MW: Yes. We can live out hope in politics, but we must never invest our hope in politics. What happens when we place our hope in politics is we delude ourselves into ignoring that politics is about imperfect choices, uncertain outcomes and unforeseen consequences. And so we end up propagandizing hope, and we force ourselves to demand politics deliver outcomes it can never deliver.

RNS: President Obama ran on a platform of “hope and change,” and you helped in that effort. In your opinion, was he successful? Did he infuse America with a sense of hope, or as his critics claim, did he sap hope?

MW: President Obama’s message of hope was one that expanded many Americans’ sense of possibility, and it is a good thing to lift our eyes up to the horizon and to consider our role in making the lives of our neighbors better. There is no reason to believe that God can work through our private charity, our churches, our families and our vocations, but that somehow politics is off-limits to Him.

To the extent that the president’s rhetoric encouraged people to put their hope in politics, to treat politics as ultimate, that is a false hope.

The idea that the “moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends toward justice,” is not original to Barack Obama or King. King wrote the phrase in a small Christian newsletter, and he was quoting another minister, Rev. Theodore Parker. What is clear from how King invokes the phrase, is that the idea of the “moral arc of the universe” is inconceivable to King apart from a sovereign God. The things we hope for are in politics are going to be most helpful if they are signposts that lead to a deeper, firmer, more lasting hope.

RNS: Tomorrow at noon, Donald Trump will become the President of the United States. Are you hopeful about America’s future under his leadership?

MW: I believe Donald Trump’s presidency will pose serious challenges to our nation. Hope is not about wishing away this reality.

I am hopeful about America’s future, because I am open to the possibility that the next four years will provide clarity to the American people about what they want from their politics and their politicians. I am hopeful because after decades of Christians like myself and other people—of various religious and political backgrounds—observing that the Christian faith had become synonymous in the public mind with Republican politics, a Trump presidency will offer multiple, stark opportunities to disrupt that notion, and to allow our faith to shape our politics rather than the other way around.

And I will always be looking for ways to advance justice and the common good no matter who is in office. Can we make our criminal justice system more equitable? Can we hit the reset button on the religious freedom conversation in this country? Will the racist antics of Trump jolt Americans to reckon with the racism that exists today, and focus on restorative racial justice to move our country forward?

And, look, I think we need to have some humility that some of what Trump is talking about might have merit. This does not mean we give him a free pass and “see how it goes,” by any means, but we cannot be reduced to reactionary opposition either. I am not invested in partisan gain in the next election if it means ignoring opportunities to help people now.

RNS: Many people — indeed many Christians — have placed their hope in Trump’s ability to “make America great again.” Is this misplaced hope?

MW: Yes. I cannot be more clear on this point. There are many constructions of what it means to “make America great again”—like many political slogans it is denotatively meaningless and connotatively manipulative. Immoral leadership will never make America great again. God’s will for America does not require moral compromise, but faithfulness and moral fidelity. Christians do a great disservice to their neighbors, and they delude themselves, if they express more hope in Trump than they do in the Church. God is worthy and capable of meeting all our best hopes.

Michael Wear was one of the youngest White House staffers in history. He is author of "Reclaiming Home."

Michael Wear was one of the youngest White House staffers in history. He is author of “Reclaiming Home.”

RNS: Some minorities in America feel hope-less about America’s future under Donald Trump. What do you say to them?

MW: I’m hesitant to say much of anything, as I learned about hope from minority Christians who understand, as Dr. Raphael Warnock has said, that hope requires a “tough mind and a tender heart.”

I have been very critical of Democrats’ lack of faith outreach in 2016, and their arrogant refusal to engage the legitimate policy concerns among many Christians of all races. Democrats need to reflect on the role our strategy played in allowing someone like Trump to win the presidency. But this is not the principle question white Christians, particularly those who voted for Trump, need to be asking. Instead, there should be some soul-searching as to why the concerns and priorities that drove the vast majority of non-white Christians to oppose Trump did not carry as much weight for so many white Christians. It is first the burden of those whose candidate won—and believe me I’d be asking the same of supporters of Hillary Clinton if she had won—to ask why so many people feel like President Trump’s America does not include them.

I have also been thinking a lot about the twenty-third Psalm. It was precisely when David was surrounded by enemies that God led him beside still waters, and set a table for him. It was precisely when David’s security was threatened by the world, that he found his security in God. We can do the same.

WANT MORE? CHECK OUT MICHAEL’S BOOK, “RECLAIMING HOPE.”

 

About the author

Jonathan Merritt

Jonathan Merritt is senior columnist for Religion News Service and a contributing writer for The Atlantic. He has published more than 2500 articles in outlets like USA Today, The Week, Buzzfeed and National Journal. Jonathan is author of "Jesus is Better Than You Imagined" and "A Faith of Our Own: Following Jesus Beyond the Culture Wars." He resides in Brooklyn, NY.

16 Comments

Click here to post a comment

  • “I have also been thinking a lot about the twenty-third Psalm. It was precisely when David was surrounded by enemies that God led him beside still waters, and set a table for him. It was precisely when David’s security was threatened by the world, that he found his security in God. We can do the same.” Well said.

    When you place your hope in man, you will always be let down.

    Why, my soul, are you downcast?
    Why so disturbed within me?
    Put your hope in God,
    for I will yet praise him,
    my Savior and my God.
    Psalm 42:11 | NIV |

    But those who hope in the Lord
    will renew their strength.
    They will soar on wings like eagles;
    they will run and not grow weary,
    they will walk and not be faint.
    Isaiah 40:31 | NIV |

  • Mr. Wear states, “Immoral leadership will never make America great again. God’s will for America does not require moral compromise, but faithfulness and moral fidelity.” Agreed, but Americans themselves cannot now agree on what constitutes faithfulness and moral fidelity, including those of us who specifically identify as Christians. I would entertain any practical suggestions from Mr. Wear as to how we bridge those gaps.

  • Christians need to put their hope in Christ and God, not in any president, political party or leader. The Obama presidency is most instructive. Those who put their trust in him over the past 8 years have been sorely disappointed. He promised the country “hope and change.” He even presented himself as a deity who was worthy of our trust. For change he presented us with the vision of a utopian society founded on Marxist principles of equality through redistribution of resources. From his divine perch he beheld those opposing him as moral cretins.

    But the country refused to be taken in. They saw through Obama’s flimsy message and gave his opponents bigger majorities in the Congress to kill his European Social Democrat-type initiatives. But deities aren’t easily defeated, so next he attempted to rule by decree. Those decrees will soon be reversed by his successor.

    Christians can pray for their president and government, but their faith is sorely misplaced if they invest it with smooth-talking politicians.

  • Funny how the liberal “Christans” gave Obama a pass when he had everything nice to say about Islam and nothing good to say about Christianity. He couldn’t even bother with an Easter message. Good riddance, Obama.

  • “the next four years will provide clarity to the American people about what they want from their politics and their politicians.”

    This is what I’m expecting. After an all-Republican 4 years, citizens will see just how detrimental their policy plans are to the majority of Americans. I’m sorry that people will suffer, but I have been unable to stop it. I predict a post- Herbert Hoover change will occur like 1932, but without the extreme deprivation due to Democratic public welfare programs enacted by FDR, LBJ and others.

  • He was elected President, not Archbishop. The first sentence assumes a fact for which evidence is nonexistent.

  • “…He even presented himself as a deity who was worthy of our trust…” Please. some people are stupid but very few are stupid enough to believe that prevarication.

  • We could start by ending the accidents of birth which result in some being born rich and some being born poor.

  • And yet, that,s what they are doing, that’s what you are commending, that’s what you think is a great idea

  • That would indeed be a wonderful thing, but in 6000+ years of recorded history it has never been the case on any systemic basis. Still, some who have been born poor have become wealthy, and some who have been born to wealth have ended in poverty, though more rarely. I applaud your suggestion, can you offer a mechanism to achieve it?

  • I hope no one thinks that Trump is moral. Obama has had one wife that he has been faithful to. He is a great father. There has not been a whiff corruption or scandal in 8 years of his entire administration. Compare that to Trump.

  • After watching the power, courage and optimism of the women’s marches, I feel much more hopeful. It was glorious!

  • I make no claims for the moral character of our new President. As to Mr. Obama, though I profoundly disagree with him on most social and political issues, I have made a point on this forum of praising him for his fulfillment of his role as both a husband and a father, which after all, are probably the most important roles he will ever fill.

  • But think of before that, when worth wasn’t determined by possessions. Trumpite cavemen ruled, but only with the wise counsel of the magi. It’s a byproduct of civilization. Perhaps 100% inheritance taxes for now, break up monopolies, redistribute everything, a Koch Brother or two swinging from a lamppost, etc. Actually Engels’ and Gramsci’s attention to the weakening of the institution of marriage is also quite helpful.

  • My sense is that all of your suggestions merely lead to a cul de’ sac, not a viable way out. However, I would be interested in a little more background on Engels’ and Gramsci’s thoughts on marriage. If, as I suspect, they disparage the institution, I would vociferously disagree. However, enlighten me if you will.

ADVERTISEMENTs