Bill McKibben, author and activist, in 2009. Photo courtesy of Nancie Battaglia

Bill McKibben talks faith on his way to the Climate March

WASHINGTON (RNS) Bill McKibben, who some call the world's most famous environmentalist, headlines the People's Climate March on the National Mall this Satuday (April 29), where he will forcefully make the case — as he has been doing for decades — that the Earth hangs in the balance.

On the stump with former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, or writing the lead piece in the New York Times' Opinion section, McKibben talks tough: "the planet can't stand this presidency" and the GOP, as he told the Washington Post recently, "is a wholly owned subsidiary of the fossil fuel industry."

But even fans of McKibben may not know that the founder of the environmental nonprofit is also a religious man — a churchgoing former Sunday school teacher who has written passionately and extensively about the spiritual underpinnings of his drive to save the planet.

RNS spoke to McKibben as he rode a train to D.C. for the march. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

What's your faith history? How were you raised?

I’ve been a good mainline Protestant of many flavors over the years. I was born in California and baptized as a Presbyterian. Then we lived in Toronto for five years, so I started Sunday school at the United Church of Canada. And then we moved to the suburbs of Boston where the local flavor was Congregationalist and I belonged to a high school youth group in the United Church of Christ. And then I moved up to the mountains (the Adirondacks) as a young man where the dominant flavor was Methodism. So now I’m a Methodist.

[ad number=“1”]

What’s it like to teach Sunday school?

I quite enjoyed it in my 30s and 40s, in churches on one side or the other of Lake Champlain. Not that I was very good at it. In my Sunday school class we tended to do a lot of hiking. I’m not sure my class wound up with much dogmatic understanding of the church. But we always celebrated St. Francis Day. We’d bring in everybody’s pets to get blessed, but also I would make sure that the children brought in representative fauna from the forest — mosquitoes and snakes too — just to make the point that it’s all creation and it’s all blessed.

[ad number=“2”]

Many people think scientists and environmentalists can't be religious, or that their spirituality is limited to walks in the woods. Why do people draw a line between faith and science?

I don’t know. Clearly there are plenty of scientists who are skeptical about theology of various kinds. But that doesn’t bother me particularly. It doesn’t bother me very much when anyone is skeptical. I’m always more bothered by people who insist they are faithful, but it would be hard to tell by the way they treat the world around them.

Why did you write a whole book that riffs on the Book of Job (“The Comforting Whirlwind: God, Job, and the Scale of Creation”)?

“The Comforting Whirlwind: God, Job and the Scale of Creation” by Bill McKibben. Image courtesy of Cowley Publications

I’ve always loved Job. Luckily my wife, who is Jewish, for some reason in our 20s handed me a copy of Stephen Mitchell’s wonderful translation of the Book of Job, which renders a difficult-to-read book into something gripping and quite amazing. That soliloquy that God delivers at the end of Job 38 and what follows is I think the longest speech that God gives anywhere in the Bible, Old Testament or New, and the first piece of nature writing in the western canon.

It’s incredibly biologically accurate, sexy and crunchy. It’s a sarcastic speech that God gives, taunting Job: “If you’re so smart, can you tell me where I keep the wind and the snow? Can you whistle up a storm? Can you tell the waves where to break?” For Job, like for all people, all he could say was “No, you’re in charge. Can I sit down now?”

My realization was that for us now, that’s changed. We are large enough now to spit in God’s face — and we are. Now it’s us who have to decide how high the waves go, how many storms we are going to get and how strong they’re going to be.

Though your Sunday school teaching days are over, why did you decide to teach the Bible to college students?

Two years ago at Middlebury College where I teach (environmental studies), I taught a course called “Stories From The Bible.” We have wonderful and very smart kids at Middlebury. It’s one of the best colleges in the country. They can all do calculus standing on their heads. They know Arabic backwards. But very, very few of them had even a rudimentary understanding of any of the stories from the Bible.

We had a great time and worked through only a little bit of the Old Testament. The stories are one after another wonderful. We did Tower of Babel one week and move on to wrestle with angels. And it reinforced my sense that Job was in a sense the first really modern story. It didn’t come with an easy moral about sin. It’s one of the reasons why it’s always been difficult, but useful for our moment.

When you speak at climate marches or political rallies we don’t hear this Bible talk much. Since some of those best-versed in the Bible are among those most skeptical of climate change, why not talk this way more often?

I do when it’s with people who can hear it. I like talking to these audiences. Not long ago I went to New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary for several lectures. I enjoyed it and it went well. I try to do that sort of thing when I can. But for many Americans, even those who spend time in church, it’s not always that useful to be referencing Job. Even a fair number of American Christians probably aren’t all that well versed in the Bible.

[ad number=“3”]

Do you think if we were more biblically literate as a society we would be better caretakers of the planet?

Maybe, but I don’t know. I haven’t noticed any great correlation. I’m afraid if you look around, it’s often people who are least likely to be engaged with the church or a synagogue or a mosque who are often standing up for Creation. And a lot of people have tried to use the Bible to figure out rationalization for doing what we’re doing to heat up the planet, kill off species and whatever else.

You have occasionally been likened to a prophet, the bearer of a message about the fate of the Earth. Do you think of yourself as one in any way?

I am not a prophet. I have never vouchsafed any particular message from the Lord. I do my best to read the signs of the times, and in our day and age it often means listening hard to what scientists have to tell us.

Do you have any particular message for people of faith who want to do something about climate change?

We’re in a very dire situation with climate change. It’s not clear whether we are going to be able to significantly slow it down. The best science indicates that we have a narrow window to do that if we act with great speed. Even that is not certain. It’s a bad sign that we’ve melted most of the Arctic.

The one advantage that people of faith may have is that they're able to at least hope that if we do everything that we possibly can, the world may meet us halfway. As long as faith leads one deeply into action, and not deeply into inaction, then that’s a very good thing.



  1. We need more people like Bill McKibben. It is very unfortunate that in this country evangelicals have done very little, really little, to counteract the greed of the big leaders of the coal, gas and oil industry. Evangelical pastors very seldom preach about saving our planet from imminent destruction. Rather they would gladly advocate the ‘end times’ of the planet and quote the Scriptures. One of the greatest mistakes made by evangelical voters in this Presidential election is to support and vote for a man like Donald Trump who stands very far from the Christian ideals evangelicals love to promote. Instead, he encourages the fossil fuel and other industries to exploit this planet shamelessly for nothing else but huge profits. This is outright indication of the hypocritical nature of the majority of evangelical voters. They ought to know that Donald Trump is first and foremost a businessman and see all things in terms of profit and loss.Thank God there are people like Bill Mckibben to make Christians realize how utterly foolish they are to exploit the planet for their greed.

  2. Hmm. There IS a visible discrepancy between “the imminent destruction” of our planet as preached by the Global Warmers, and the historical events relating to the end of the world as presented in the book of Revelation.

    But nobody really wants to discuss theological GW discrepancies. Besides, for GW adherents, scientific consensus is achieved simply by canning any scientist — even other global warming supporters! — who fail to march in lockstep.

    So I simply smiled when Trump won. Maybe it sent a little message to the GW folks. Meanwhile, as Matt Ridley wrote, “There are problems with oil, gas and coal, but their benefits for people—and the planet—are beyond dispute.”

  3. “The sky is falling! The sky is falling! The sky is falling!” – Chicken Little

  4. Neither the Chicken Little cries from some on the left nor the conservative ostrich with his head buried in the sand are appropriate responses.

  5. Regardless of our own beliefs or fighting over the cause, look at the Arctic. Its rapid transformation, beyond what our models predicted, will modify much of the northern prisoner’s climate. If the Greenland ice sheet melts at its current rate, expect significant sea level rises.

  6. Jim – from your picture (if that really is you) I assume you are a mature man. I remember all the lib hype in the ’70’s about the coming ice age. Then in the ’80’s it was global warming, then in the ’90’s it was climate change. Then we found out the climate change nazis had fabricated stats to support their assumptions. Then there was Al “I created the internet” Gore with his propaganda. And remember the hockey stick infographic which said by this time you should be sitting on a beach in antarctica sipping pina coladas with penguins. Remember those things. Why believe the climate hucksters? Let’s just do things that will give us clean air, clean water, and clean soil. Leave the “Chicken Little” hucksters to curse the darkness.

  7. Newsmax is not a reliable news source
    “They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. “

Leave a Comment