• Pingback: ‘Black Lives Matter’ signs at churches vandalized - mosaicversemosaicverse()

  • Pingback: ‘Black Lives Matter’ signs at churches vandalized | Christian News Agency()

  • alison

    I’ve been pretty ticked off by this. Yesterday my daughter explained it to me this way. Suppose you had two children. One you showered with love and frequently told that child how much you loved them. The second child you just basically ignored. Finally the second child asks, “Do you love me?” Instead of saying “Yes, I love you, you say ‘I love both of you.'” That is the difference between Black Lives Matter and All Lives Matter. We already know that all lives matter. But we need to specifically affirm that Black Lives Matter.

  • Doc Anthony

    The vandalism needs to stop. That’s not a good response to the “Black Lives Matter” controversy.

    At the same time, it sure would be nice to see those same churches hang some “Cops Lives Matter” signs out there. Is that too much to ask of those “inclusive” churches?

  • Gentlemanandscholar

    No we don’t

  • Gentlemanandscholar

    Excellent comment. Thank you.

  • orthodoxheretic

    I think Alison’s comment is spot on. It certainly is strange that people would be offended by saying that black lives matter.

  • Randy McGraw

    You are exactly correct!!!#Blacklivesmatter #VotingforBernie

  • Jack

    All vandals must be prosecuted, period.

    But the fact that this is showing up in suburban liberal areas like Arlington, VA tells us something:

    People can distinguish between a cry for racial equality and justice and an evil, divisive radical movement that’s corrupt to the core.

    The kinds of people behind Black Lives Matters called Dr. King an Uncle Tom and cheered his assassination. The last thing they want is a racially inclusive society. They are using Marxist class warfare tactics and applying them to race in the same way that fringy radical feminists have tried to do with gender or that La Raza types deploy on ethnic issues. These people hate America and are hijacking race, gender, and ethnicity in pursuit of an agenda that seeks to tear America asunder and replace it with some twisted Marxist vision that is both anti-liberal and anti-conservative.

    I’m glad that people of all stripes are seeing through at least some of the slimy deception.

  • Jack

    They disrupted Bernie’s rally. That should tell you something when even Bernie Sanders isn’t radical enough for them.

    We don’t need a group that wants to apply a blow torch to liberal democracy to tell us that we need to embrace racial justice. And they are about as much for racial justice as the KKK or Louis Farrakhan.

  • DougSlug

    Is the phrase “African-American” now out of vogue? I thought “Black” was considered offensive. What is the currently most socially acceptable adjective we should all be using?

    I think what matters is picking one, sticking with it, and letting everyone else know. It’s difficult to demonstrate respect when you’re being chastised for unintentionally using the “wrong” adjective.

  • Jack

    Anyone who dances in fear to the tune of political correctness these days is pathetic. I think that “black” and “African American” are equally acceptable, although “African American” sounds a little pompous and buffoonish, like something out of a bad 1980s or 1970s comedy routine. It’s like calling a bath room a “lavatory.”

  • Jack

    In other words, “black” sounds more natural and down-to-earth — as a natural counterpart to “white”.

    Wouldn’t it be nice if we could just call each other human beings and be done with it?

  • AE

    Perhaps you mistook “gentleman” for rude and indifferent, and “scholar” for just plain ignorant.

  • AE

    Unarmed blacks in America are about twice as likely to be shot by police as unarmed Hispanics and whites in similar circumstances. Is that not a problem? What is it about even bringing up the topic that makes you feel so threatened that you want to change the conversation? Would you feel differently if those figures were reversed and unarmed whites were twice as likely to be shot?

  • AE

    I don’t recall anybody cheering Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination. It was a terrible day for America. Whom are you talking about? What exactly about a cry for social justice leads you to hallucinate “Marxist class warfare”? No Black Lives Matter demonstrator has committed an assault or crime, much less “warfare” in bringing attention to their cause. You however seem to have a whole list of people that you fear and hate. Calm down. I’m pretty sure that if you were twice as likely to get shot as any other ethnic group in similar encounters with the police, that you sir, would regard that as a BIG problem.

  • DougSlug

    Thanks, Jack, for bringing it back around to what was probably the point of the vandalism: why was it necessary to single out one group with the slogan to begin with?

  • Garson Abuita

    There have been many reports of assaults by BLM protesters, as well as undisputed trespassing, blocking of traffic, etc.

  • Jack

    AE, obviously you know nothing about the late 1960s or even the basic difference between a liberal and a radical. Either that or you do know and are lying like a rug.

    King was absolutely detested both by the Black Panthers and the largely white Weather Underground because unlike these radical organizations, he was not seeking to tear down America or transform it into something it never was but to reform it. For that, he was called a sell-out and a “Tom.”

    The reaction of the radical left to King’s assassination was grotesque. They were no different from the KKK in their hatred for him.

    Black Lives Matter is not about King’s legacy of racial inclusion but the radical left vision of division and hate. Just do a google search about its latest disgusting antics at Dartmouth, as it harassed and bullied and shouted obscenities at students studying in one of the libraries.

  • Jack

    Most important, AE, compare the civil rights movement to Black Lives Matter.

    A big reason for America’s successful civil rights revolution and for the civil rights legislation that followed was how King’s followers behaved with dignity and class, even under the worst provocation by white racists. They made people proud to be American and proud of the civil rights struggle.

    Unlike Black Lives Matter, the 1960s civil rights revolution was a pro-American revolution that called the nation to fulfill its potential and its founding document as one in which we are all brothers and sisters with equal rights under God. King’s harkening back to the Pilgrims, who were anti-slavery (unlike the Puritans), his haunting call for America to be what it was supposed to be, is enough to bring tears to almost anyone’s eyes.

    But cold-eyed radicals are never moved by such things.