A golden retriever sits at the top of a stone structure.

It's time for evangelicals to speak up for animals (COMMENTARY)

A golden retriever sits at the top of a stone structure.

A golden retriever sits at the top of a stone structure.

Barrett Duke didn’t grow up with pets and never gave the welfare of animals any serious thought. Then he met Rusty — the golden retriever who stole his heart.

Duke discovered what most animal lovers know: that Rusty was more than just a random assortment of cells wrapped in fur. He had a personality and intelligence and a will that was all his own. When he lost Rusty to cancer, it was like losing a family member.

“Rusty was such an incredible animal, it changed my perspective on God’s creation,” Duke told me.

The wonder of this creature sent Duke, a devout Southern Baptist, to his Bible searching for answers about how to best care for animals. He became convicted of the importance of humane treatment for what Duke now calls our “co-inhabitants” on Earth.

READ: Sorry, Fido. Pope Francis did NOT say our pets are going to heaven

Animal welfare was an issue on which every major American Christian denomination had taken an official position. No such guidance existed for evangelicals.

Until now.

Born of Duke’s search for answers, an “Evangelical Statement on Responsible Care for Animals” was released Wednesday at the National Press Club.

Duke, a vice president at the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission joined with Ethics and Public Policy Center Vice President Michael Cromartie and The Clapham Group’s Mark Rodgers to develop a clear biblical statement to guide the religious faithful on animal care.

READ: At PETA’s shelter, most animals are put down. PETA calls them mercy killings.

It has garnered the signatures of a who’s who of evangelical leaders including Richard Land of the Southern Evangelical Seminary, Willow Creek Community Church pastor Bill Hybels and Southern Baptist leaders Russell Moore and Albert Mohler. The Humane Society of the United States has affirmed the statement.

The proclamation, which provides extensive scriptural citation, asserts, “God has given all animals the breath of life, that He sustains them… they belong ultimately to Him, and… He has declared them ‘good,’ indicating they have value to Him independent of human use.”

Many conservative evangelicals bristle at the mention of the animal rights movement because they believe it puts humans and animals on equal footing. But the evangelical statement is unequivocal that humans hold a unique status in creation. In fact, it’s this special status that demands humans practice extra care with all of God’s creation. The signatories affirmed the belief that, “all animals ultimately belong to God, are sustained by Him, and exist to bring Him praise and reveal His character.”

READ: Creationists’ Achilles’ heel? Dealing with animal suffering

Also being announced today is the launch of the “Every Living Thing” initiative, which will begin a yearlong effort to engage Christians in dialogue around the biblical mandate to care for animals.

Research commissioned for the “Every Living Thing” campaign by Lifeway research found that 89% of Protestant pastors agree that Christians have a responsibility to speak out against animal cruelty and neglect. At the same time, only 17% said their churches were involved in addressing animal welfare at the local level.

The hope is the “Every Living Thing” effort can help close this gap.

Make no mistake: the brutal, torturous treatment of animals as they are raised to provide food is a real evil that demands confrontation.

On factory farms, pigs — highly intelligent and social animals — spend their entire lives trapped in crates so small they can’t turn to the left or the right. Hens live life-long in cages so small they can’t even extend their wings and geese have tubes shoved down their throats to force feed them to make foie gras. When Pope Benedict was a cardinal, he described such treatment of animals as a “degrading of living creatures to a commodity (that) seems to me in fact to contradict the relationship of mutuality that comes across in the Bible.”

These precious creatures have no one to speak up for them but us. The added voice of America’s 100 million evangelicals in their defense could be a game changer.

Somewhere in heaven Rusty is smiling.

(Kirsten Powers writes weekly for USA TODAY and is author of "The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech.")



  1. The article reads — ” The signatories affirmed the belief that, “all animals ultimately belong to God, are sustained by Him, and exist to bring Him praise and reveal His character.” ”

    That’s beautiful.

    Pet havers and lovers are the best.

  2. So which is it? Justice for animals, and justice for refugees, and justice for the unborn, and justice for the earth, and justice for clean water, and justice for sex slavery and justice for …. This article presumes that not enough is being done and that we need a global church movement to stop it. It also presumes that unless we see it in the media or new outlets, then nothing is happening. False on all accounts. I am for all of these things, but can someone help me know how much I should put into each one to satisfy the whistle blowers????

  3. I don’t think it is so much that we each personally have a quota of action to meet in each of these (and certainly other) areas. I think it mainly has to do with raising awareness so that we can be more conscious of our own decisions and what we silently condone simply because we are not aware of it.

    It is so easy (myself included) to not give some of these issues a thought at all if they have not affected us personally–we simply are not aware of them. So, people who care about an issue feel called to bring it to our attention. It is then up to us whether we further study it or act on that new awareness or continue in a heightened state of awareness so that “we have eyes to see” when perhaps we should step forward and act.

    No, individually or even as congregations or religions, we cannot cure the world in each issue. But, acting in the aggregate in even small ways can have a great impact.

    Perhaps that is all that is desired?

  4. I admire the South Koreans as they still enjoy a good puppy meal.

  5. Repeal abortion laws in this country and then we can address the rights of animals. I have yet to hear any protest from the animals, so why even talk about imagined rights? We eat them, wear them, and play with them.
    Killing our own kind is unnatural, not offering “rights” to a lower species.

Leave a Comment