Election campaign makes some evangelicals reject name

David Platt, pastor of The Church at Brook Hills in Birmingham, Ala., center, listens while Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission President Russell Moore, right, leads a June 9, 2014, panel discussion. Photo courtesy Paul W. Lee

David Platt, pastor of The Church at Brook Hills in Birmingham, Ala., center, listens while Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission President Russell Moore, right, leads a June 9, 2014, panel discussion. Photo courtesy Paul W. Lee

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

(RNS) The head of the public policy arm of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination caused a stir this election season when he said he no longer wanted to be called an “evangelical Christian.”

Russell Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, sought to distance his own faith from the one surveyed at the polls or preached by televangelists promising riches as a reward for belief in God.

“Any definition that includes both a health and wealth prosperity gospel teacher and me is a word that’s so broad it’s meaningless,” he told RNS.

RELATED STORY: Russell Moore: Don’t call me an ‘evangelical’

But an evangelical identity crisis has been simmering for some time.

For Moore, evangelical leaders’ support for -- or silence on ­-- Republican candidate Donald Trump in the current presidential race was the last straw.

For bloggers Micah J. Murray or Rachel Held Evans, who wrote about her struggles with the church in her 2015 book “Searching for Sunday: Loving, Leaving and Finding the Church,” it was the number of evangelical Christians who cancelled sponsorships for children in need after World Vision announced in 2014 it would employ people in same-sex marriages. (It later reversed that decision.)

RELATED STORY: Rachel Held Evans defends exit from evangelicalism, calls Christians to celebrate sacraments

Evans was raised in an evangelical family and always had identified as one. Growing up, she said, the word seemed synonymous with “real” or “authentic.”

But, she said, “The World Vision incident confirmed what I’d been suspecting for a while -- that my values were simply out of line with the evangelical culture’s values. And by then, I’d just grown weary of fighting for a label that no longer fit.”

“If you look through evangelical history, conservatives and progressives have been in this tug of war about what it means to be evangelical,” said Deborah Jian Lee, author of “Rescuing Jesus: How People of Color, Women and Queer Christians are Reclaiming Evangelicalism.”

Two things are happening now, according to Lee: “People are either leaving and distancing themselves from the evangelical label, and others are staying and trying to change it.”

She puts herself in that first group, she said, along with a number of post-evangelical Christians she interviewed for “Rescuing Jesus” who now call themselves simply “Christian” -- or by labels like “progressive Christian” or “spiritual, but not religious.”

Murray said he calls himself an “angsty, post-evangelical, progressive-ish Christian.”

These Christians maintain, “The gospel is for everyone ­– no exceptions,” Lee said. But, for many, evangelicalism has become about “rules and boundaries and who’s in and who’s out,” she said.

“That doesn’t sound like good news. That doesn’t sound like the message of the gospel,” Lee said.

Tracing history

It’s an age-old question, according to Lee: What is an evangelical?

Nobody agrees, she said. Some exclude black Protestants from the label, counting "black Protestant" as its own category in polls, although many would identify with beliefs that are considered evangelical, she said. Some measure behavioral benchmarks like Scripture reading and church attendance.

The Institute for the Study of American Evangelicals at Wheaton College in Wheaton, Ill., estimates the total number of evangelicals at up to 100 million Americans, she noted. Meantime, she said, the Pew Research Center puts that number closer to 62 million.

What is clear, she said, is that the evangelical Christian movement "wields huge influence in America.” That's reflected in the polls and in how evangelical leaders shape policy and culture, she said.

And that’s nothing new, according to Larry Eskridge, former associate director of the Institute for the Study of American Evangelicals, which closed in 2014.

“These are hardly new arrivals in American culture. This is part of the makeup of the country,” Eskridge said.

The movement has its roots in the early church -- from the Greek word "euangelion" (εὐαγγέλιον), meaning “the good news” -- and the Protestant Reformation (Martin Luther called his church the "evangelische Kirche," or “evangelical church”), and it came to the United States, as the country declared its independence, with evangelists John Wesley, George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards, according to Eskridge. By the 1820s, evangelical Protestantism was the dominant form of Christianity in the U.S., he said.

It split from fundamentalism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, wanting to be more engaged in the world and across Christian denominations, and it coalesced around places like Wheaton and the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago and people like Billy Graham, he said.

But, he said, “To get that army to march to the beat of a single drum is nigh on impossible.” And that confusion is showing now, as evangelicals try to hold their coalition together.

The problem with polling

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump points to Liberty University President Jerry Falwall, Jr. after speaking in Lynchburg, Virginia, on January 18, 2016. Photo courtesy of REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump points to Liberty University President Jerry Falwall, Jr. after speaking in Lynchburg, Virginia, on January 18, 2016. Photo courtesy of REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Russell Moore isn’t ready to give up on the term “evangelical.” It’s a beautiful word, he said, and one that “we can and ought to reclaim.”

Part of the confusion is a misunderstanding by those outside the church of what “evangelism” means, according to Moore. It becomes a political voting bloc in many media reports, he said.

And the religious right mobilized by the late Jerry Falwell and others has “done a good job of defining of what it means to be evangelical in the public sphere and the media” over the past 40 years, Lee said. That’s overshadowed the progressives who have been part of that sphere this whole time, she said -- and it’s put off a number of Christians who previously identified as evangelical, Murray added.

“Donald Trump’s support among many evangelicals has brought these tensions to a head, and I’ve been encouraged to see evangelical leaders like Russell Moore begin preaching a gospel that transcends a single political party,” Evans said.

Instead of asking respondents if they identify as evangelical, the Barna Group is asking whether they met nine specific theological criteria. Among them: people who say their faith is very important in their lives, the Bible is accurate and sharing their religious beliefs with non-Christians is essential.

Moore agrees with that kind of approach -- to be considered an evangelical, one should agree on theological positions and be actively engaged in a local congregation, he said.

But a Pew Research Center analysis released Monday (March 14) showed those who self-identify as “evangelical” or “born again” in its polling meet many of the same criteria tracked by Barna: they are more than twice as likely as other voters to attend church at least once a week, share their faith with others and agree that religion is “very important” in their lives and that the Bible is the literal word of God.

Shifts in evangelical culture

Part of the confusion over the term also is an identity crisis within evangelicalism, Moore said. The movement “often does a very poor job of maintaining its theological identity.”

“I think that’s changing because when one looks at what’s happening in the universities, in the seminaries, in the major conferences across the country, there’s an evangelicalism that is much more subconsciously, theologically aligned,” Moore said.

That’s not all subconscious, though. More careful attention to theology “has been necessitated by shifts in evangelical culture,” Moore said.

When agreement on cultural values was assumed, he said, evangelicals downplayed their unique beliefs -- both with each other and with those outside the church.

But, Lee said, “The demographics of this country are changing rapidly, and the demographics of the church are following suit.”

Non-white Christians made up 19 percent of evangelicals in 2007, according to the Pew Research Center. By 2014, that number had increased to 24 percent.

Not only has the racial makeup of church people changed, but also the generational makeup, she said. Those communities are bringing their own values ­-- and, Eskridge said, they’re offering competing visions for who is an evangelical.

The “self-appointed leaders” of evangelicalism have been “conservative, white, straight, cisgender men” who view scripture through that lens, Lee said. They may not understand there are many other segments of the church “that cherish Scripture just as much and love Jesus just as much and want to live that out in their lives -- they just look different,” she said.

And younger generations of evangelicals tend to fall in the center of the political spectrum, shifting the emphasis to social justice issues, according to Eskridge. Even that isn’t entirely new to evangelicalism, he said: British politician William Wilberforce, for one, helped lead the movement to end slavery.

“It’s been a contentious and puzzling question all along, so in a lot of ways this is nothing new because it has spilled over so much into the cultural stereotypes and the public arena because of the political edge,” he said.

Defining ‘evangelicalism’

Rachel Held Evans is the author of "Evolving in Monkey Town" and "The Year of Biblical Womanhood." This piece was adapted from her contribution to The Mother & Child Project: Raising our Voices for Health and Hope recently released by Zondervan. Photo courtesy of Maki Evans

Rachel Held Evans is the author of "Evolving in Monkey Town" and "The Year of Biblical Womanhood." This piece was adapted from her contribution to The Mother & Child Project: Raising our Voices for Health and Hope recently released by Zondervan. Photo courtesy of Maki Evans

 This image is available for web publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

The most famous definition of evangelicalism ­-- and the one many evangelicals and evangelical organizations like Moore, LifeWay Research and the National Association of Evangelicals continue to point back to -- is the Bebbington Quadrilateral.

In 1989, David Bebbington of the University of Stirling in Scotland identified four characteristics that define evangelicals. They include:

  • conversionism, a belief each person must experience a conversion and be born again;
  • activism, a need to express one’s belief in the Gospel through action;
  • biblicism, a high regard for the Bible as the ultimate authority;
  • and crucicentrism, an emphasis on Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.

“Evangelicalism is not some abstract ideology, it’s a commitment to the gospel that people who have submitted themselves to the lordship of Jesus Christ have made, including in their church lives,” Moore said.

There’s a “big tent” on issues that are considered secondary, he said. For instance, Moore is a committed Baptist, but he thinks a “believer’s baptism” – in which Christians are baptized after making a profession of faith, rather than as infants – is negotiable for evangelicals. There’s room for disagreement, too, on the nature of spiritual gifts or the role of women in the church, he said.

Evangelicals are “obsessed with Scripture,” Lee said, but there’s “diversity in how people interpret the text and how they should live out the gospel calling. That interpretation is very wide ranging.”

Evans, for one, said she still believes the Bible is the authoritative word of God, faith is both personal and communal and the gospel is worth sharing. And everything from the way she views Scripture to the things she gets nostalgic about remain rooted in her evangelical past, she said.

But she now goes to an Episcopal church, struggles with doubt and sometimes votes for Democrats. She also supports the full inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people in the church and said she hates that evangelicalism has become synonymous with “anti-gay.”

Earlier this month, both she and Murray tweeted their responses to those questioning the label “evangelical” after Moore’s declaration.

“I suspect that most evangelicals would not identify me as ‘one of them,’ so after a decade of trying to convince the culture I belong, I just dropped the label,” she said.

“Now I simply identify as a Christian.”

(Emily McFarlan Miller is a national reporter for RNS)

ISIS lures with video game themes
Mother Teresa to be canonized on Sept. 4
Churches pray for refugees on fifth anniversary of Syrian civil war
‘Trump’ pastor call for Sanders to ‘meet Jesus’ offends many
Vatican monsignor confesses to church court he leaked documents


  1. I too hate and will not fight to save the term “evangelical.” It is corrupted by right-wing politics and based more in fear than anything else. But I certainly can’t get cozy with progressives either. Any term or label you come up with will immediately be critiqued and type-cast. As long as the fight for Christian identity is fought at large and in the media, it will loose to ridicule and misunderstanding. The way to battle it is in the community, in neighborhoods, and with individuals. It’s easy to hate/misunderstand Christians at large, but the Christian neighbor you know who is kind and generous may sway your opinion. So let the big media names keep talking, and I will keep apologizing for them and distancing myself from them, all while I help my neighbor see the real Jesus, not the one they talk about.

  2. “What is clear, she said, is that the evangelical Christian movement “wields huge influence in America.”

    And I am only one of the millions of Americans
    who have quit the church. The influence of Christianity on America is neither good nor practical.

    Not only is God clearly a culturally enforced illusion – but the various versions of Christianity are based on wishes, prejudices, biases and silly traditions – not realities.
    American would do well to follow other countries and dial back the religious influence as well as the silly dogmas and beliefs.

  3. The label “Evangelical”, just like the labels “Christian”, “Catholic”, “Protestant”, and “Mainline”, really don’t mean much of anything anymore.

    Biblical and spiritual **confusion** has become the new American religion. That’s not just true during election season, but also before and after election season as well.

    For that reason, I like Barna’s solution of asking respondents about nine specific theological criteria. Just narrow things down a little. Ask some survey questions that get a little closer to what people have got cooking around here (and what kind of questionable ingredients they’re using when they think nobody’s looking!).

  4. While I appreciate the efforts of evangelical leaders to condemn Donald Trump’s racism, to be blunt, evangelicals only have themselves to blame for this disaster. Evangelical Christianity has been fostering a culture of hate and exclusivity for centuries and even the original leaders this article praises so much were guilty of much of the same extremism, if not even more so. Progressive Christians and secularists have been warning the Religious Right about this for decades now but they branded them as heretics and blasphemers. And now that the bigotry and hate is no longer under their control, only now do they realize what a mistake they made when it’s already too late to do anything about it.

  5. Yes, they are very much to blame for their own position, but I also think the emergence of progressives and “centrist evangelicals” as David Gushee posits reveals they are not all part of the problem and are pushing back against both past errors and current stereotypes.

  6. Excellent article that makes some important distinctions about what is and is not “Evangelical”, and why so many are abandoning that term and its baggage. The historic merger of Evangelicals with angry Republican politics that started in the late 1970s has gradually but surely driven me away…and this has only accelerated over the past 8 years, with the onset of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

    One minor historical quibble (that does not in any way detract from the point that Evangelicals have long been involved in social change movements), William Wilberforce was actually British activist that helped end the slave trade in the English colonial world of the early 19th century. He had nothing to do with slavery in the U.S.

  7. This article is one of best that I have seen on the term “Evangelical” and its history. It has been misunderstood in the modern media especially those who have little history of the variety of Christian denominations. The term has been abused by politicians pandering to certain religious groups. Groups that often do not understand the gospel of Christ.

  8. I wouldn’t say “nothing”. He was emulated by the American abolitionist leaders and served as an international leader of slave abolition for a long time after Great Britain abolished slavery.

  9. They might not all be part of the problem but they are certainly late in the game.

  10. Hey Max or should I call you ‘Mad’? Sorry, only joking… ;-). Christianity has always transcended culture. The various cultures in Africa alone testify to that. But not convinced? South America, the number of different cultures in Europe. Do think they’re different? Check out how difficult it is running the EU? Don’t forget the Eastern Orthodox countries. Then there’s the Christians in Asia- China, India, phillipines etc. Have I covered all the continents, except Antarctica of course? Culturally enforced? History shows time and again – when one culture is forced upon another, rebellion always ensues. I haven’t even talked about the cultural diversity among the other monotheist faiths. People recognise a truth…for themselves personally. That’s what keeps them there. The ones who fall off..I can’t begin to know why they abandoned their faith and it’s not mine to judge. I do agree with your subsequent comment re traditions but then after all, we are only human…..

Leave a Comment