Appeals court upholds ban on religious songs

TRENTON, N.J. (RNS) A federal appeals court has upheld a policy that allows songs like “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” but prohibits religious carols like “Silent Night” and “O Come All Ye Faithful” in Maplewood-South Orange public schools. A three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said there was “no constitutional violation” in […]

TRENTON, N.J. (RNS) A federal appeals court has upheld a policy that allows songs like “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” but prohibits religious carols like “Silent Night” and “O Come All Ye Faithful” in Maplewood-South Orange public schools.

A three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said there was “no constitutional violation” in the policy because other constitutional principles require public schools to remain strictly secular environments.

“Those of us who were educated in the public schools remember holiday celebrations replete with Christmas carols, and possibly even Hanukkah songs, to which no objections had been raised. Since then, the governing principles have been examined and defined with more particularity,” Judge Dolores Korman Sloviter wrote for the court.


The judges said public school administrations can discern which songs are most appropriate according to those constitutional guidelines because schools already are charged with the responsibility of creating a secular “inclusive environment” for students every day.

The controversy dates to 2004 when the Maplewood-South Orange district extended a 1990 ban on singing religious songs in school performances to include instrumental versions of those songs.

Calls to the school district’s lawyer seeking comment were not returned.

A parent in the school district, Michael Stratechuk, filed a lawsuit in December 2004, saying the ban on all religious music is a violation of the First Amendment, which protects the freedom of worship.

Stratechuk’s lawyer, Robert J. Muise, of the Thomas More Law Center, a public interest law firm in Ann Arbor, Mich., promoting religious freedom for Christians.

“The establishment clause requires the government to be neutral to religion. A policy that makes exclusions based solely on religion is hardly a policy that is neutral to religion,” Muise said of the court’s decision.

He also said he and his client will ask the full court to rehear the case. If denied, they may appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.


Donate to Support Independent Journalism!

Donate Now!