Is Pope Francis ignoring clergy sex abuse? Some are beginning to wonder

Print More
Pope Francis greets the crowd as he arrives to lead his general audience in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican on Sept. 11, 2013. Photo by Paul Haring/Catholic News Service

Pope Francis greets the crowd as he arrives to lead his general audience in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican on Sept. 11, 2013. Photo by Paul Haring/Catholic News Service

Active RNS subscribers and members can view this content by logging-in here.

(RNS) Pope Francis has captivated the public by embracing disfigured pilgrims at the Vatican, cold-calling the downtrodden and washing the feet of young people at a detention center, but he has yet to meet with abuse victims.

  • Duane Lamers

    Mr. Gibson, perhaps you haven’t paid enough attention to all parts of statements that Pope Francis has made. He has clearly aligned himself with traditional teaching regarding moral issues even while noting that the Church now should STRESS other aspects of its mission.

    In your article you cite instances of Francis taking quick action regarding clergy involved in abuse scandals, so why do you ask the question that is the header to your column, or is the header supplied by someone else not very knowledgable about what the pope is doing?

    The “some” who “are beginning to wonder,” clearly have not been paying attention to what the pope has been saying. Perhaps they are getting most of their “news” from the secular news media that cannot be counted on to give us anything but what they want us to know. Equally likely, the “some” are paying too much attention to pronouncements from those groups that have nothing but clergy sex abuse on their minds.

    You might take a look at some of the opening paragraphs of Evangelii Gaudium wherein Francis notes media bias.

  • Dr Rosemary Eileen McHugh

    As a physician, I have met many who have been sexually abused by priests. As a Catholic, I had hoped that Pope Francis would have the courage and integrity that I have witnessed in another member of the hierarchy when I shared with him my story of having been sexually assaulted by a Carmelite priest when I was a young doctor in Dublin, Ireland.

    In 2010, I met Archbishop Diarmuid Martin of Dublin and told him my story. Immediately he referred my case to the police for investigation and he has removed that priest from ministry. The Archbishop listens to victims and he makes the predators accountable. He has given all files of clergy sexual abuse under his control to the police, since he knows that the church cannot investigate its own crimes.

    It saddens me that Pope Francis refuses to give all files in the Vatican and elsewhere on clergy sexual abuse to the police and to the United Nations for investigation.

    The Pope, like popes before him, is ignoring the command of Jesus to protect the innocence of children. The Pope prefers to protect the sexual predators from accountability it seems.

    Recently in Australia, it has been found that at least 50 young men have committed suicide, who were sexually abused by the order of priests and brothers teaching them. They gave up hope that their stories would be believed, due to the denial of the truth by the predators and by the hierarchy.

    Where is Jesus in all of this? Jesus said the truth will set us free. Archbishop D. Martin is focused on what he believes Jesus would do, by making the predators accountable to civil law. I hope and pray that Pope Francis will have a “come to Jesus moment” and come to realize that living in the truth is not easy, but it is freeing, since the Holy Spirit is in control, and it is the greater glory of God that impels us to live in the truth!
    Sincerely, Dr Rosemary Eileen McHugh, M.D., Chicago, Illinois, USA

  • Doc Anthony

    Oh well. Who am I to judge?

  • Rosemary – Your rants are tiresome and unhinged.
    It took you until 2010 – after alleging speaking to alleged victims for years – to report your claim of abuse?? Really?

    And, David. I know the beat may be slow, but I always imagined you as better than drumming up an unnecessary Catholic Church abuse story.

  • Judy Jones

    We wonder if Pope Francis is having any trouble squeezing himself around the huge elephant in the room. He can’t be that blind, can he?

    The sex abuse and cover up within the church hierarchy is still going on to this day. Cardinals and bishops are still not removing accused predator clergy, and they are still not reporting to law enforcement. Their so called “zero tolerance” policy is not being followed by the bishops who created it. They don’t have to, because there is no punishment to force the bishops to change their ways of protecting their image and the institution rather than protecting innocent kids. Until they spend time behind bars for their crimes of cover up, nothing will change and children will still be sexually abused within this archaic secret system. It is becoming more clear that Pope Francis can not be counted on to remove and fire these criminal bishops.

    Does the pope care if his silence and in-actions keep hurting thousands of victims, and continues to put innocent children at risk of being sexually abused?
    Judy Jones, SNAP Midwest Associate Director, USA, 636-433-2511.,
    “SNAP (The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests)

  • Pingback: Is Pope Francis ignoring clergy sex abuse? Some are beginning to wonder | Do You Really Believe?()

  • gilhcan

    “Lest it be forgot…,” the sexual abuse of our children by clergy unnaturally required to be celibate (and chaste–not chasing), was almost totally ignored by John Paul. It was the collusion of John Paul with his successor Benedict who managed the handling of clergy involved in sexual abuse be transferred to then-Cardinal Ratzinger’s “Holy Office” of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

    John Paul notoriously did nothing. He was to incapacitated to be anything but a wheeled-about, symbolic figure. Ratzinger was already running the church with the arrangement that he would succeed John Paul. Also, diocesan and other bishops do not act independently of the Vatican curia. The cover-up was managed from the on top.

    Therefore, it should never be claimed that the church needs to rid itself “of bishops who have enabled abuse.” Robert Finn of Missouri and all other bishops have been acting on “orders from headquarters.”

    It is true that Francis can and should make fast changes to end the continuing scandal, the cover-up being equally as bad as the sexual abuse itself. Given the hierarchical, monarchical arrangement of church management and the flood of departures from the church of the people of God due to atrocious, sinful, and criminal mismanagement, the genuine staunching of the sex scandal and clerical celibacy should come before everything else. We are in desperate need of another reformation, or counter-reformation, call it what you will.

    It does not require all this time to correct this gross scandal. It could be done with one loud and clear announcement from St. Martha’s House just as John XXIII announced Vatican II from the Apostolic Palace. It has only taken all this time to try to hide the larger scandal. The church is as much of an unholy mess now as prompted Martin Luther and others to confront the theological grounds of outrageous church behavior in the sixteenth century.

  • gilhcan

    I guess all this delay–especially during the “reigns” of John Paul and Benedict–shows that popes are not the independent monarchs they are claimed to be. It would be good to know the realities behind Benedict’s “decision” to retire. Not that he didn’t deserve it, given his age. Perhaps we should be attending to some kind of age and/or term limits on popes. Francis is great at a late age, but can or should we rely on that. The church desperately needs vast reforming. That includes lay people at all levels of decision-making.

  • Dr Rosemary Eileen McHugh

    Sadly, popes for centuries have ignored the demand of Jesus to protect the innocence of children. I found it hard to believe that even Pope John XXIII signed a document in 1962 which reinforced the secrecy of clergy sexual abuse and sent it to bishops around the world for it not to be spoken about, shortly before he called the Second Vatican Council. What could this otherwise good pope have been thinking of, to be willing to betray the trust and innocence of so many more children worldwide who had no voice? This is an outrage that calls to heaven for justice for these victims, a good number of whom have committed suicide when they gave up hope of being believed.

    I believe the canonization of Pope John XXIII and of John Paul II need to be re-visited and cancelled, since no pope for centuries has cared about following Jesus’ command of protecting the innocence of children.

    Sincerely, Dr Rosemary Eileen McHugh, Chicago, Illinois, USA

  • Estelle

    You have a crass attitude when it comes to clergy abuse victims.
    You fit right in there with the old boys club in the Vatican as well the majority of the clergy around the world.
    ust pray about and all will be well…NOT so!!!
    I’m not buying into Pope Francis excuses for not helping the victims more. He is using the old-fashioned tactic of deflection and sadly he is using the poor as a shield.

  • Estelle

    You are a survivor, good for you Rosemary!
    Many folks just don’t get it right, about the victims who have been abuse by the clergy.
    It a dirty secret the Catholic Church and their supporters want to forget about and continue to pray and maybe it will just go away.
    Wake up people… the victims!

  • Estelle

    Well said Judy!

  • Estelle

    If Pope Francis was serious about doing something about clergy abuse crises in the Catholic Church he would at least put a halt to Pope John-Paul II canonization.
    Pope Francis is going ahead with that canonization. I couldn’t believe he would do such a silly thing. Then again he is a good friend of the ex-Pope Benedict.

  • Pingback: Bible thumper * Jewish deli * Rain prayers: Thursday’s Religion News Roundup | Hartford Faith & Values()

  • Pingback: Pope Francis launches commission to tackle sex abuse | Toledo Faith & Values()

  • Duane Lamers

    Gilhcan, we are already seeing Pope Francis institute measures to make himself more responsive, which includes overhauling his “cabinet” bureaus, the dicastries. He also took action in recent weeks regarding two American bishops involved in the handling of sex abuses cases in their dioceses.

    I suspect that in the near future we will find a couple of the dicastries being headed up by laypeople.

    Francis has much to say, some of it controversial, in his Evangelii Gaudium, just released. He is far different from his predecessors; we can see it even in the language he uses in the text.

  • Estelle

    This better be not another publicity stunt by the Catholic Church.

    I heard from another poster and I do agree with him.
    ” Until the pope outright declares that any found guilty of abuse, or those who shield them, will be kicked out of the clergy and let the law run it’s course, there will be no real change.”

  • Pingback: Pope Francis launches commission to tackle sex abuse | Columbia Faith & Values()

  • Pingback: Pope Francis launches commission to tackle sex abuse | Hartford Faith & Values()

  • Duane Lamers

    Judy’s remarks might be well stated, but some of them are without any basis in fact. SNAP is on a mission, on that I approve of, but people hell-bent on missions can sometimes fail to see important facts that should temper their enthusiasm just a bit. It is one thing to go after clerics who demonstrably have been involved in abuse or its coverup; it is quite another to charge complicity on the part of the pope in these matters.

    SNAP shouts. It behooves us to turn down their volume a bit since they won’t do it themselves. It should be careful lest it damage its own effectiveness by making claims or even suggestions that do not withstand scrutiny.

  • Duane Lamers

    Perhaps Francis is already doing this without making a big PR effort about it. Remember, he has said that he wants to establish a different public course of emphasis by the Church. This does not mean abandoning the “negatives” that must be dealt with. Evangelii Gaudium makes this clear. It’s a long document but well worth reading, although we are now seeing that there might be some problems with its translation into various languages, English included.

  • Pingback: Kirche heute, 8. Dezember 2013 | Christliche Leidkultur()

  • Duane Lamers

    Bergoglio gave Ratzinger a run for his money at the conclave in ’05. Oops, that’s indelicate and inaccurate phrasing. Bergoglio was the second-highest vote getter, according to one or more cardinals who weren’t even supposed to tell us that much.

    John Paul II was a sick man already in 2002, when the abuse problem broke wide open. He died 3 years later. It is quite possible that he was not even apprised of the seriousness of the abuse, and it is also possible that his own failing energy left him unable to appreciate the seriousness of it even if he had been told. When our energy fails us, we can find ourselves losing proper perspective as we attempt to make decisions about what issues we ought to address.

    Besides, in the US crimes are to be handled in the community in which they occur by the legal authorities in that community. The mistake John Paul made was in transferring Cardinal Law to an inconsequential position in Rome. Instead, he should have demanded his resignation as bishop and told him to find a Trappist monastery in which he should spend his remaining days.

    If legal authorities have not gone after the bishops for transferring around the abusing priests, perhaps they felt that the bishops’ role in all this was not sufficiently grave so as to demand their trial and sentencing.

    I don’t claim to know, but I do know from many comments posted here that their authors are primarily interested in taking a clean swipe at religion. They admit their hostility toward it. You can easily find these for yourself with a couple clicks of the mouse.

  • Pingback: Pope Francis’ big year | The Christian Journal()

  • Pingback: Rape survivor: Pope, clean up church | ChannelsChannels()

  • Pingback: Rape survivor: Pope, clean up church - The Peoples 411 : The Peoples 411()

  • Pingback: Pope Francis must finally root out child abuseThe Warri Post | The Warri Post()

  • Pingback: Rape survivor: Pope, clean up church | Uddin MerchandiseUddin Merchandise()

  • Pingback: Rape survivor: Pope, clean up church | الخبر.نت|

  • Pingback: Rape survivor: Pope, clean up church | Herman EnterprisesHerman Enterprises()

  • Pingback: Pope Francis must finally root out child abuse | Christian Reforms()

  • John Stefanyszyn

    The “rights” of children vs the “rights” of the Vatican
    Ref.: “Vatican ‘must immediately remove’ child abusers – UN” BBC Feb 5, 2014
    “….The UN watchdog for children’s rights denounced the Holy See for adopting policies which allowed priests to sexually abuse thousands of children.
    ….But the Vatican said that…”it regrets to see…an attempt to interfere with Catholic Church teaching on the dignity of human person and in the exercise of religious freedom” and “reiterates its commitment to defending and protecting the rights of the child… according to the moral and religious values offered by Catholic doctrine”.
    ….Barbara Blaine, president of a group representing US victims of abuse by priests, told the BBC that the UN report “reaffirms …and shows that the Vatican has put the reputation of Church officials above the protection of children.”
    WHICH BELIEF does the Vatican ( the church of general values of Rome) turn to for protection?…..they have confessed that it is its exercise of religious freedom….its freedom of self-rights……It does that which is right in its own eyes. It believes that it is right to protect itself and its pedophile priests. It believes in its self-interest…to serve and magnify the “self” (XES).
    Keep in mind that the “pedophile priests” are just the tip of the iceberg.….how about the protection of?….the priests / bishops / cardinals / & popes that fornicate with “of age girls”, with married women, with prostitutes, that have caused abortions, that fornicate with other men, that are corrupt for money, that are corrupt for political power, that lie, that are alcoholics, that take on the title of “Father”.
    BUT above all of these, is their belief that it is RIGHT (a right) to be free to worship ANY ‘god’….as Jorge Bergoglio (and his predecessors) have confessed that “religious freedom” is right and good.
    President Obama has confessed that this “SELF-FREEDOM” is the “LIGHT” of man’s righteousness and that this same “FREEDOM” is the “will” of his ‘god’… of fortresses.
    It is clear that Christ is not their first love…that their first love is instead their “freedom”….and that this is the mark on their forehead.
    BUT soon, the Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the Only God, will rule the earth in power according to and in obedience to the Will of the Only God and NOT according to man’s love for “his self justified freedom / rights”.