Santeria, Scientology, Satanism — oh my! Atheist author explores minority religions

Print More
Karen Stollznow

Photo courtesy Karen Stollznow.

Active RNS subscribers and members can view this content by logging-in here.

How much do you know about Santeria, Scientology, or Satanism? Atheist author Dr. Karen Stollznow tells RNS why all people, religious and nonreligious alike, need to learn about minority religions.

  • Pingback: NonProphet Status » Blog Archive » Karen Stollznow interview, part two()

  • As an Evangelical working in the study of new religious movements and trying, in part, to counter problematic depictions of these minority religions, I look forward to seeing Karen’s work.

  • John Davis

    Scientology certains seems to bring out “experts” on the subject who know absolutely nothing about it. On web sites, comments on Scientology are usually a cut and paste of some other person’s comments about it in the past. Hubbard is usually described as a “Science Fiction writer.” This is rather like describing Mary Baker Eddy as a “housewife.” He wrote fiction – not only Science Fiction – to finance his research into the mind. Writing was for him, I believe, a means of support at the beginning and a recreation.

    Hubbard must be the most prolific writer known to man. His published works, including lectures on CDs, fiction and non-fiction, would fill a small town library wall to wall.

  • Christopher Blackwell

    I wonder why it it is so rare that people learn anything about a religion that they will then attack ad say all sorts of ignorant things.

    I have far more respect of people that learn a bit about a religion before they say anything. So it is nice to see people beginning to break through the wall of their own ignorance. And we all have those wall in the

    So whether atheist or evangelical, I find myself respecting anyone that learns about other religions.

    In reverse I think religious people need to get to know about atheists ad agnostics. It is not necessary to agree, only that we do better when we understand that there other views on everything. Difference is not a matter of good and bad but just a difference of viewpoint. Once we allow others to have their view, then and only then can we begin to work out the problems between different viewpoints.

  • Chuck Beatty

    I was Sea Org (Scientology’s lifer staffer category like nuns or monks of traditional religions, people who take essentially the vow of poverty).

    I comment monthly, weekly on Scientology related chat sites since 2004 to now.

    I was a training officer (Flag Course Sup and 1 year word clearer) 1977 to 1983.

    I did the research and writing and wrap up, sort of a scribe project, of all of Hubbard’s admin, for the Int Base run “Computerized Routing Forms Mission” which provided standard routing forms that raised orgs stats, proven by months of gathered statistics.

    All this said, I was an atheist before, and again today.

    I reached out for 10 years now, to new religious scholars.

    Scientology is a spiritual practice, and despite Hubbard admitting to his Creston Ranch hand/friend Sarge Steven Pfauth, Hubbard admitted failure “here on earth”, read the final pages of the recent books that quote this interview with Sarge, he’s confirmed what he said about Hubbard at the end of Hubbard’s life is accurate.

    So, not by a long shot are your generalizations accurate.

    How many years were you in the Sea Org, and what orgs did you work at?

    What did you actually read of LRH”s.

    A huge crop of expert ex members are speaking freely on the the internet, and you friend, are NOT listening to them, why is that?

    Chuck Beatty
    ex Sea Org, 1975-2003
    866-XSEAORG toll free advice phone
    See my answers at “All Experts”

  • Scnethics

    Hubbard was incredibly creative, typing 70 words per minute non-stop for extended lengths of time, producing stories he was able to sell to pulp magazines and sometimes to book publishers. The most amazing thing he created was scientology, which is a story I fell into as a young person and almost never escaped from. It’s a story where humanity is a weakness, family is connections are genetic (not spiritual) and love simply does not exist. It is a story, a deception, and when you are in it, you do your part to perpetuate and keep the story alive. Once you’re out of it, you don’t exactly appreciate how your were deceived and manipulated, hence the not-too-favorable opinions you’ll read about Hubbard and his cash-cow.

  • John Davis


    With all due respect, you are a blown Sea Org member.

    I visit many of the “ex members” sites, Rathbun, et al. There are things some of them say that make sense. But it’s like a tiny diamond in a cow pat.

    So much of what they write is just a bunch of motivators and trying to make Scientology or LRH wrong – and, themselves blameless and angelic at the same time.

  • Dean Fox

    With all due respect John you are clearly a devotee of the church of scientology and as such cannot be objective. I realize that this is also true of ex-members, those who have blown. As a never was in person who has read a few books, listened to more lectures and testimonials my take is this.

    The beliefs of scientology are a mix of various Eastern religions with L Ron Hubbard’s “space opera” added in. The theory behind auditing stems from the work of Sigmund Freud who also believed that past traumas affect your present self in the same way Hubbard proposes, although he stopped at the womb and did not go in to past lives.

    Issues with the beliefs arise with the tone scale. Doubt being classed as a crime is part of a clearly identifiable “thought stopping” mechanism; though stopping mechanisms are designed to instill in to the adherent phobias against questioning anything they are told by a selected “source”.

    The thought stopping mechanism here is doubt is a crime combined with the reinforced idea of one must only having positive thoughts and that doubts are an indicator of something being wrong with the doubter; they are the doubters fault and harmful to the doubter the doubter therefore fears them.

    Another thought stopping mechanism can be found in the “study tech”. The official text is correct, if you do not understand it then you have a problem. The solution to the problem is convoluted and tedious, in the first instance finding the misunderstood word, looking it up and using it in all its forms in sentences. This can cascade as other misunderstood words are discovered either in the text or the definitions. In the second making a clay model and in the third repeating a lower level of training because the student must be on too high a “gradient”. In such a regime the student quickly learns to happily accept everything thing as read unquestioningly; this feels good because the student reaches a point where they feel they understand everything but all they are doing is forming nebulous understanding. The problem with this is when they are told to do something in the name of the texts they believe they will do it unquestioningly because to question would mean they didn’t understand it in the first place. That in many cases the texts are gobbledegook that evade understanding because they lack substance is neither here nor there.

    I could go on but real life intervenes. I will say though the actual beliefs are not the biggest issues. The biggest issues are physical, mental and financial abuses perpetrated by the church of scientology.

  • CJ

    I really hope she does a good job on the Satanism portion of her book… I think that Satanism is the most misunderstood atheistic tool there is… Like when a murder happens and it says satanism was the cause. In Satanism, it is a worship of yourself. You dont believe in god or the devil, you believe in urself. One is the center of their universe which does make sense. It is a look at our carnal nature as humans… I hope she doesnt go to the wrong person for this and goes to Peter H. Gilmore himself! If only LaVey was still alive!

  • Nancy

    “On web sites, comments on Scientology are usually a cut and paste of some other person’s comments about it in the past.”

    I frequently visit websites where people discuss Scientology. It is common for contributors to “cut and paste” comments (just as I have done here) in order to respond to specific points. Perhaps you should cite some verifiable examples if you expect your point to be taken seriously.

    “He wrote fiction – not only Science Fiction – to finance his research into the mind.”

    Hubbard never “researched” the mind. Yes, of course, he claimed he did in his Dianetics book. However, he never cited verifiable sources or case studies of any kind; he simply TOLD the reader that he had conducted research. If you don’t want to believe my statement, simply read “Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health” and follow the footnotes/endnotes to the research. This should be an easy task – there are no such entries.

  • Samantha Domingo

    (((sigh))) people do your research. I’m tired of repeating myself

  • You have remarked very interesting details! P.s. Nice web site =)

  • Pingback: Oregon Progressive | Santeria, Scientology, Satanism — oh my! Atheist author explores minority religions | Faitheist()

  • Rainhard

    religion is insanity. should we go to a mental asylum to trie to understand the residents there?

  • What’s up to every one, the contents present at this website are really awesome for people knowledge,
    well, keep up the nice work fellows.

  • s List and see how many people are selling used vending machines and routes.
    There is no waiting, no writing gargantuan business
    plans that are off the mark anyway, and much less stress.
    Promote your bakery through special events during the holidays.