Donate to RNS

No parole for Sirhan!

Sirhan Sirhan was not just an assassin. He was a terrorist.

Sen. Robert F. Kennedy addresses a throng of supporters in the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles early in the morning of June 5, 1968, following his victory in the previous day's California primary election. A moment later he turned into a hotel kitchen corridor and was critically wounded. His wife, Ethel, is just behind him. (AP Photo/Dick Strobel)

(RNS) — Sirhan Sirhan is now 77 years old.

No matter; for those of us of a certain age and a certain generation, he is eternally etched in our memories as the youthful assassin of Senator Robert F. Kennedy, shooting the then presidential candidate after his victory speech the night of the 1968 California Democratic primary. 

A California parole panel has recommended Sirhan for parole. The matter still requires the approval of the full board, as well as that of the governor of California. Sirhan has, of course, aged. He has said that he is no longer the man who committed that horrific act of political violence. 


RELATED: Israel’s rabbinate asks Pope Francis to explain comments about Judaism


There should be no parole for Sirhan Sirhan.

Why?

Because he is a convicted terrorist.

Let’s review the historical facts. 

Sirhan Bishara Sirhan was a Christian Palestinian resident of Silwan, in East Jerusalem. He chose to kill Kennedy on June 5, 1968, because it coincided with the first anniversary of Israel’s stunning victory during the Six-Day War. Sirhan hated Kennedy because he had supported Israel; in fact, that was exactly what Sirhan said when he testified at his own trial. 

Why is it important that there be no parole for the assassin of Robert Kennedy? 

First: We cannot see that assassination simply as a one-off. Quite the contrary; it was part of a spring and summer crescendo of violence that still leaves its scars on the American moral landscape.

About 15 years ago, I had the blessing of sitting at the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta on Martin Luther King Day between Kerry Kennedy (once, Kerry Kennedy Cuomo) the daughter of the late senator, and Martin Luther King III, the son of the late Dr. King. I saw them embrace; I heard their muffled whispers.

Theirs was a bond of unspeakable pain. Kerry Kennedy and Martin Luther King III both lost their fathers within months of each other. Both men were victims of assassins’ bullets. Both men died, in the words of the Hebrew poet Chayim Nachman Bialik, “before their time and before anyone’s time … (with) one more song to sing, but that song had been stilled forever.”

We often bemoan the gun-based violence in our country, as well we should. But in point of historical fact: No period in recent American history has seen the murders of two iconic figures, two months apart. It was followed by massive political violence at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.

The assassination of Sen. Kennedy was not just a murder; it was part of a trend. 

Second: One man’s hatred of Israel utterly redirected American political life and the story of the presidency.

Kennedy’s assassination eliminated the one Democratic candidate who arguably could have unified the party and invigorated it with a new sense of vision. It led to the nomination of Hubert Humphrey and, ultimately, to the victory of Richard Nixon. 

Third: While all political assassinations are acts of terror, this one was of a particular variety. It was simultaneously anti-American and anti-Israel. 


RELATED: Study: Jews of color love Judaism but often experience racism in Jewish settings


There are grisly parallels between Kennedy’s assassination and the terrorist attacks of 20 years ago on Sept. 11, 2001. In both cases, terrorism reared its ugly head on American soil, irrevocably changing the course of events in this country.

Note that I did not say “Islamic” terrorism; Sirhan Bishara Sirhan is a Palestinian Christian. The name Bishara is a common Arab Christian name; it means “flesh,” as in the flesh of Jesus of Nazareth.

It is not only the parallel to the 9/11 atrocity that is relevant here. It is the parallel to the terror killings in Kabul. This is precisely the wrong time to let a terrorist go free — even one who is a budding octogenarian.

Some of us still, 53 years after his assassination, wonder aloud: How would this nation have been different had Senator Kennedy lived?

The one who destroyed that dream does not deserve to walk among us as a free man.