Mastodon

‘We’re All Mexicans’ and ‘Je Suis Juif’ are terrible, nonsensical rallying calls

“Black Lives Matter” works. “We’re All Mexicans” does not. Expressing solidarity and support shouldn’t require us to falsely claim identities that have already been claimed.
‘We’re All Mexicans’ and ‘Je Suis Juif’ are terrible, nonsensical rallying calls
Emilio and Gloria Estefan

Emilio and Gloria Estefan

Grammy-winning music producer Emilio Estefan announced Thursday plans to record a musical “celebration of Hispanics and our accomplishments.”

The Cuban-American’s track “We’re All Mexicans” will feature dozens of Latin and Hispanic celebrities including his wife Gloria Estefan, Wyclef Jean and Shakira…none of whom are Mexican.


Estefan said he wants the song to “send a message that represents unity” in light of Donald Trump’s steady stream of anti-Mexican remarks. If that’s the goal, he’s already failed.

For starters, Trump and many Americans already blur everything below Texas. Even fewer can explain the difference between Latino and Hispanic. Bringing a bunch of Hispanic and Latin stars together to sing “We’re All Mexicans” (when only a few actually are) sounds like a recipe for more confusion.

Unlike the abstract rallying call “Je Suis Charlie,” which emerged after the Charlie Hebdo shootings in Paris to communicate solidarity and support for free speech, “We’re all Mexicans” has its own pre-established meaning. The title might work as a Mexican national anthem, but as rallying call for a much broader community of allies, it’s inherently limiting.

The same is true of “Je Suis Juif” — “I am Jewish” — the solidarity slogan Muslims and others in France adopted after four hostages were killed at a kosher supermarket near Paris in January.  

These Je Suis/Nous Sommes/We’re All configurations only make sense when abstract concepts are tacked onto the end. We can now “be Charlie” because being Charlie wasn’t a group identity before the Charlie Hebdo shootings. We don’t assume people who wear “Je Suis Charlie” shirts are in fact named Charlie. It’s a newly constructed statement of solidarity—not one of identity.

When we try to construct solidarity phrases using adjective that already have specific identity significance — Jewish, Mexican, Black, trans — we confuse and dilute what it means to be all of these things. 

I’m all for taking license with language and creating new and meaningful expressions. I just don’t think this relentless Je Suis trend makes sense when applied to pre-established identities.


#BlackLivesMatter, but We’re not All Black…because we’re not.

Jews are Jewish. Mexicans are Mexican. I am neither. I don’t need to falsely claim these identities to show support and solidarity with communities for whom these identities already have significance.

No paywalls here. Thanks to you.
As an independent nonprofit, RNS believes everyone should have access to coverage of religion that is fair, thoughtful and inclusive. That's why you will never hit a paywall on our site; you can read all the stories and columns you want, free of charge (and we hope you read a lot of them!)

But, of course, producing this journalism carries a high cost, to support the reporters, editors, columnists, and the behind-the-scenes staff that keep this site up and running. That's why we ask that if you can, you consider becoming one of our donors. Any amount helps, and because we're a nonprofit, all of it goes to support our mission: To produce thoughtful, factual coverage of religion that helps you better understand the world. Thank you for reading and supporting RNS.
Deborah Caldwell, CEO and Publisher
Donate today