Beliefs Politics

Judge blocks holiday displays in Santa Monica after atheist-Christian spat

(RNS) A federal judge on Monday (Nov. 19) denied a bid by churches to force city officials in Santa Monica, Calif., to reopen spaces in a city park to private displays, including life-sized Christmas Nativity scenes.

The city shut down the six-decade tradition last year after a bitter dispute between religious groups and atheists, who overwhelmed the city’s auction process for display sites, winning most of the 21 slots.

U.S. District Court Judge Audrey Collins formalized her ruling after it was given to attorneys in advance, The Associated Press reported.

William Becker, an attorney representing a group of Christian churches, said he would appeal. Another hearing on additional arguments is scheduled for Dec. 3.

“The atheists won,” Becker told the Los Angeles Times. “It’s a shame about Christmas. Pontius Pilate was exactly the same kind of administrator.”

In last year’s struggle, the secular groups got the right to use 18 stalls at Palisades Park, while two stalls went to traditional Christmas displays and one to a Hanukkah display, the Santa Monica Daily Press reported.

The atheist groups used their stalls to put up signs referring to religion as a myth or comparing Santa Claus to the devil. Most of the signs were vandalized in the ensuing uproar.

Beset by intense wrangling and even threats to city employees, officials in this California beach community of 90,000 people that borders Los Angeles decided to get out of the holiday display business altogether.

But the church groups fought back. They erected a 14-scene Christian diorama so they could sue over freedom of speech claims and seek a federal injunction to force the city to restore the event. They have accused the city council of caving in to a “heckler’s veto,” the Daily Press reported.

“It’s a sad, sad commentary on the attitudes of the day that a nearly 60-year-old Christmas tradition is now having to hunt for a home, something like our savior had to hunt for a place to be born because the world was not interested,” said Hunter Jameson, head of the nonprofit Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee that is suing, the AP reported.

The city responded to the legal maneuvering with a motion noting that Santa Monica is “a coastal, visitor-serving community with very crowded public spaces, including its parks.”

The motion argues that the council “appropriately exercised its legislative discretion to balance use of public spaces and ensure shared usage.”

The atheist groups, for their part, sat out the court fight, letting the churches and the city battle it out among themselves.

“In recent years, the tactic of many in the atheist community has been, if you can’t beat them, join them,” said Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center and director of the Newseum’s Religious Freedom Education Project in Washington, the AP reported. “If these church groups insist that these public spaces are going to be dominated by a Christian message, we’ll just get in the game — and that changes everything.”

(Doug Stanglin writes for USA Today.)

KRE/AMB END STANGLIN

About the author

Doug Stanglin / USA Today

4 Comments

Click here to post a comment
  • This comment is not a solicitation for business. Regarding the above story, “There will be a generation who never knew Me”. I am so glad I am the age I am…

  • Since when is there a right to use public property to impose one’s religious views on others? Are these people so insecure in their beliefs that they need to visually assault people who do not share those beliefs?

  • Christians have the right to spread nativity scenes around Christmas, and Jew have the right to share their display in public about Hanukkah. This is a free Country and they have the freedom of speech to do it. They are only putting up Christmas trees and Menorahs around their holidays. Atheists should have no say or input in the matter. Not their belief, not their holiday. If the city sides against a religion, they are siding with Atheism, which in term is against the constitution. Thank you very much. God bless you all and have a very merry Christmas!!
    Jesus loves you all

  • If churches want to display nativity scenes, let them do it on their own church grounds! They shouldn’t be allowed to erect them on public property paid for by tax dollars. Not all taxpayers are Christian or even religious for that matter… If we truly have rule “by the people” and the “people” have supported separation of church and state then what’s the fuss about? You can’t have your cake and eat it too!!!

2019 NewsMatch Campaign: This Story Can't Wait! Donate.

ADVERTISEMENTs