A banner with the new French translation of the Lord's Prayer, at left, for churches that want to help parishioners recite it aloud during Mass, on sale in a religious goods shop in Paris, France, on Jan. 30, 2018. RNS photo by Tom Heneghan

What would Jesus say? European Catholics grapple with Lord’s Prayer translations

A banner with the new French translation of the Lord's Prayer, at left, for churches that want to help parishioners recite it aloud during Mass, on sale in a religious goods shop in Paris on Jan. 30, 2018. RNS photo by Tom Heneghan

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

PARIS (RNS) —  The Lord’s Prayer has a reassuring ring for Roman Catholics who recite it in English. The Shakespearean style of its opening lines — “Our Father, who art in Heaven, hallowed be Thy name … ” — suggests something ancient and unchanging.

In other languages, however, translations of the prayer Jesus taught to his disciples are now the subject of lively debate. The French recently updated theirs, and the Italians will opt for their own new version later this year, while the Germans have just said a firm “nein” to any change.

Pope Francis, who in his native Spanish prays a version that is slightly different again, encouraged proponents of a new translation in December when he praised the changes made in French.

[ad number=“1”]

But another reform the Argentine pontiff has championed — giving local church hierarchies a greater say in how the original Latin texts of prayers are translated — gave the German bishops the leeway to refuse to follow the suggestion he made.

Welcome to the confusing world of Catholic translations, where linguistics, theology, ecumenism and power politics clash despite the church’s claim to universalism. (The term “Catholic” comes from the Greek word for universal.)

"The Lord's Prayer (Le Pater Noster)” by artist James Tissot. Image courtesy of Creative Commons

The problem arises from the fact that Jesus would have recited his prayer in Aramaic or Hebrew, but it was reported in the Gospels in Greek and later translated into the Roman church’s official language, Latin.

A key point of discord: The Latin text of the prayer’s sixth petition to God is "ne nos inducas in tentationem” ("lead us not into temptation”), while the Greek original, which ends with the word “peirasmos,” can also be translated as a “trial” or “test of faith.”

Some non-Catholic churches have been more flexible with that line and focused on the Greek version. An ecumenical translation by liturgists from around the English-speaking world translated it as “save us from the time of trial.”

But Catholic congregations, which recite the prayer at Mass, want to avoid straying too far from the Latin. Theologians disagree on how to transfer that phrase from a dead language into living modern tongues.

The current confusion began when Catholic bishops in France switched to a new translation on Dec. 3, changing the sixth petition from "Do not submit us to temptation” — the wording they have used since the 1960s — to "Let us not enter into temptation.”

They argued that God would not tempt his faithful into sin, so a new translation was needed to avoid the impression that he would willingly do the devil’s work.

French-speaking Catholics in Belgium and Benin had already introduced the change in June 2017, but seeing it happen in much larger France attracted attention in the wider Catholic world.

In an interview with the Italian Catholic television station TV2000 a few days later, Pope Francis approved the French move and agreed the older version was faulty.

Pope Francis speaks during a Mass at the church of the Parish of San Pier Damiani at Casal Bernocchi on the southern outskirts of Rome on May 21, 2017. Photo by Remo Casilli/Reuters

“(God) is not the one who pushes me into temptation,” he said. “A father does not do that. … The one who leads into temptation is Satan.”

Francis actually misquoted the new French translation, explaining in Italian that it said “do not let us fall into temptation.” That is the way this line is translated in Spanish and Portuguese.

The Catholic Church in Italy proposed almost a decade ago to replace “do not lead us into temptation” with the phrase “do not abandon us to temptation,” but only announced last week that its bishops would meet in November to approve its use at Mass.

[ad number=“2”]

Italian theologians began working on the change as early as 1988 and its bishops approved it in 2002, Cardinal Giuseppe Betori of Florence told the Italian daily Avvenire in December.

But a Vatican directive in 2001 titled Liturgiam Authenticam stated that all translations of prayers must be as close as possible to the original Latin, which forced local churches to review all the work they had recently done and get approval from Rome for the slightest change.

Denounced by critics as a bid by conservatives in the Vatican to exert control over national churches around the world, this led to years of haggling between Rome and commissions of bishops from the major language groups.

Vatican authorities insisted on translations that critics in several language groups, especially English, thought sounded stilted to native speakers and were hard to recite out loud.

[ad number=“3”]

Pope Francis, who frequently criticizes Vatican centralization, acted to end this tension in September by issuing an edict saying that national bishops conferences would from now on decide how to render prayers from Latin into their own languages.

Cardinal Robert Sarah, the conservative head of the Vatican department that oversees translations, claimed in October that his office still had the power to impose its versions on recalcitrant bishops. A week later, the pope took the unusual step of publicly telling Sarah he was wrong.

One effect of this devolution of responsibility became clear last week when the German bishops conference, an influential subgroup within the world Catholic hierarchy, announced it did not agree with the objections that others — including the pope — had to the traditional translation of the Our Father.

A crucifix on an open Bible showing an English translation of the Lord’s Prayer from the Gospel of Matthew. Photo by James Chan/Creative Commons

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

“The petition ‘lead us not into temptation' … does not express the suspicion that God could want people to fail, but the belief in his justice and mercy,” it said in a five-page statement explaining why it would not change its translation.

The statement mentioned ecumenical reasons for sticking with the old version. Bishop Heinrich Bedford-Strohm, head of the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD), had said a week before that churches could not simply rewrite biblical texts.

But it also posed a problem for German-speaking Austria, where Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna agreed with Pope Francis shortly after the pontiff’s interview. The bishops conference there now has to decide whether to follow the pontiff’s advice or to keep in step with its larger neighbor and not change anything.

In countries with two or more languages, Catholics can pray differently according to where they live. In Belgium, the Wallonia region adopted the new French translation while Flanders switched in 2016 to a new Dutch translation that says “bring us not to the test.”

Switzerland has a German-speaking majority that has not changed its Our Father, a Francophone minority that will follow the French example at Easter this year and an Italian-speaking minority that will make the switch when Italy does.

The Rev. Adrian Schenker, an emeritus professor of Old Testament studies at Switzerland's University of Fribourg, found a way to say that both the old and new translations were correct.

Both versions would be possible if the petition were translated back into Jesus’ native tongue, Aramaic, or the Hebrew used for prayers in the synagogue, so his original words could have been understood both ways, the Dominican theologian wrote in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung.

“Both translations and both understandings are possible and so they must have been intended,” he said. “Wherever the Biblical speech has several meanings, we must understand it in its ambiguity.”

(Tom Heneghan is a Paris-based correspondent for Religion News Service.)


  1. Gee whiz! another “tussle” over the inability of the creator of the entire universe to speak clear English.

  2. This reminds me of the professor I had in theology school who insisted we all have multiple translations of Scripture because no single translation captured every nuance of the text. He was right.

    Multiple translations are a blessing, not a curse. It’s good to grapple with language. It keeps us from becoming complacent and settling for the overly familiar.

  3. Multiple translations are a blessing, true, because they can help to bring about the nuances of the concepts found in Holy Scripture. But a liturgical translation should be kept uniform and in continuity with the past. It is an important part of Church tradition, which should be guarded and transmitted to future generations.

  4. I agree that uniformity within a liturgical context is important, but that can be determined by national episcopal conferences. We don’t need native Italian-speakers dictating to English-speakers, or French-speakers mandating what the text should be in German.

  5. Another sign that the RCC had difficulties with scripture?

  6. I think it best for Catholics to have the liturgy in Latin.

  7. ALL who know the Creator love Him, and know that HE is perfect and sinless. Those who serve Satan, as Ben does, would cast doubt on our Perfect LORD, to cause men to doubt. GET THEE
    BEHIND US, Ben. Thou art as chaff in the East wind. Hellfire awaits thee.

  8. Matt. 7:7, (etc.) “Ask, and it shall be given you…” Idiots “grapple,” true believers ask God. At one time, the bible was beautiful and clear, but men have corrupted it so many times, as led by Satan, for their own selfish purposes, that it has lost it’s true and sacred value.

    Now, reading it just results in confusion, and pits men against each other, which thing is pleasing to Satan. There is a living Prophet of GOD on this earth today, who communicates with the Lord Jesus Christ, but only those who seek the Prophet by “Asking God” will find him. “SEEK and ye shall find..” Shalom

  9. Seems like the root of this Christian theological conundrum is that they’re addressing what is essentially a Jewish prayer. It was being taught by a Jew to other Jews. It is one of the most Jewish parts of the New Testament — so Jewish, in fact, that it is sometimes recited at interfaith Jewish/Christian weddings as something that won’t offend either family. There are parts of the modern Jewish liturgy that are very similar in cadence and content.
    But in Judaism, Satan — or more accurately the satan — is generally viewed as the tempter and accuser of humankind, although ultimately under God’s authority as a loyal servant (angel). I doubt it would have been shocking to the original audience to pray “do not lead us into temptation.” There are parts of the modern Jewish liturgy that pray, essentially, that God keep us far from the satan. These prayers are based on Talmudic sources, which go back to a time not too far from Jesus’s.

  10. How about taking the whole verse in context instead of splitting it in two? After all, there was no punctuation. Why presume the first part refers to God and not mankind? So much is forced to change when the Kingdom is removed from Christianity to make way for religion and human churches..

  11. Honey, there is no way I’m getting behind you. First, I’m married. Second,
    I don’t know where you’ve been.
    but you really, really ought to see someone about your god complex. Because Third, I’m not casting doubt on your perfect Lord. I’m casting doubt on YOU.

  12. Michael, stop threatening Ben. Your god sounds like quite the jerk, too. Funny how your god resembles you…funny, that…

    So how come your “perfect” god can’t communicate perfectly? Your entire religion is a friggin joke. Just get over it already!

  13. There is so much to say to the crude responses above, but my DEAR LORD reminds me to NOT CAST MY PEARLS BEFORE SWINE…so I refrain.

  14. I didn’t know pearls were brown. And yet you’ve already called me a servant of Satan and a few other nasties. You’re just not clear on the concept.

  15. I’m CRYSTAL clear…the TRUTH sets us FREE. You are still BLINDED by your “brown pearls” and the evil master that you call “nasty”..

  16. ‘But in Judaism, Satan — or more accurately the satan — is generally
    viewed as the tempter and accuser of humankind, although ultimately
    under God’s authority as a loyal servant (angel).’

    So true and yet unfortunate that Gentile Christianity thought it more appropriate to deflect evil from the human nature and make it into an outside source. Great way to shirk responsibility and of course having enemies are a traditiional way of mankind. Gentile Heaven forbid that enemy should be ourselves.

  17. Readers, I AM Satan!!! I’ve taken over FHRITP and am controlling his mind!! Reject Jesus the weakling in favor of me!!! –Wait, we should love baby Jesus– Shut up!! I am in command now. Brahahaa!!

  18. Wouldn’t it be great if in an ecumenical gesture, the churches could come together and develop a translation that all would use in their respective languages? It throws me every time with the various versions when I am at a different church and that is just in English.

Leave a Comment