American on women deacons panel: ‘I feel like I’ve won the Academy Award’

Phyllis Zagano, a scholar at Hofstra University, is the only American woman named to the Vatican panel that will study whether women can be ordained as deacons. RNS photo courtesy of Hofstra University

(RNS) The Vatican this week unveiled Pope Francis’ picks for a 12-member panel of scholars who will study the question of whether women were ordained as deacons in the early church, and whether they could be ordained in the Catholic Church today — a historic step, if it were to happen.

What will the commission, which will operate under the supervision of an archbishop from the Vatican’s doctrinal office, do?

A few hours after the announcement was made on Tuesday (Aug. 2), RNS spoke with Phyllis Zagano of Hofstra University on Long Island, the leading scholar of woman deacons and the only American woman named to the Vatican panel, which is evenly weighted between men and women.

Zagano, author of “Holy Saturday: An Argument for the Restoration of the Female Diaconate in the Catholic Church,” has long championed the idea that women can and should be ordained deacons.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.

Q: How did you find out you were named to the commission?

A: I got an email. (She laughs.) That’s it. I came into my office at 8:30 this morning and there were a number of emails congratulating me and I got to the one with the press release announcing that I was on the commission.

Q: You’re kidding.

A: No. I had no idea. I feel like I’ve won the Academy Award.

Q: Do you know why you were chosen?

A: Other people had spoken to me [in previous months] about the commission — none that I know who were making lists. But I was asked if I was asked to be on the commission would I do it? And I said of course I would. Newspaper and magazines have blogged that I should be on the commission, and I have certainly published, I think, seven books on the topic and I don’t know how many papers.

Also, my work has focused on women in the diaconate, period. I’ve never gotten mixed up in the women in the priesthood debate. And I think that is my strongest credential. I don’t see the two ministries as connected. The diaconate is one that women have historically participated in. More recently, there have been women in the Eastern Catholic churches, but certainly in the Western churches [in the past]. And I have done a significant amount of speaking on the topic, including internationally. I wrote academically and in the popular media. I’ve also had discussions with various church leaders to say this is a matter of discernment, that this is something that the Lord has left his church to decide.

Nobody from the [Vatican] Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith called to say, “Do you want to come to Rome?” It is my understanding and intuition that members of the hierarchy in Rome and the United States, when asked about women deacons, would respond, “Phyllis Zagano.”

Q: What is your sense of the views on this topic among the other members of the commission?

A: I’m not aware of any academic research by any of the other members of the commission on women in the diaconate, and that is my focus. So to characterize any individual one way or the other, I couldn’t do it. … I know of some of these esteemed professors but I don’t know any of them personally.

Q: Do you know how the commission will work and when you will meet?

A: I don’t. The only thing I know is that nothing will happen before September. That’s the only word I have from Rome as far as any procedures. But to have the announcement here in August [traditionally a slow month for activity in the Vatican and Italy] is very interesting to me. It means Francis is really moving on this. He’s saying, “You do this.” To me it’s very fast. He only said off-the-cuff in May that he wanted a commission. Here we are just 10 weeks later.

Q: But he also cautioned against raised expectations, that women deacons will be allowed.

A: That’s right. But the fact that it’s being discussed is the important thing because it will create a discussion among the whole church. And that’s what is important, the discussion. There are several questions: Were there women deacons? Of course there were. Were they ordained? Of course they were. Should the church have women deacons today? That’s the discussion.

I think it breaks down culturally more than it breaks down politically. I’m seeing this as the Holy Father [who is from Argentina] thinking about this as a South American bishop: Wouldn’t he love to see some of these 25-year-old women religious [nuns and sisters] hiking up the mountains to baptize people and marry people when the Catholic Church is losing how many thousands a day to the evangelicals in South America?

So I think it becomes a cultural discussion as much as an academic and theological discussion.

Q: But the mandate for your commission seems to focus on exploring the historical precedent for women deacons — terrain that was covered by a previous theological commission in 2002 that left the door ajar for such a step.

A: Yes, but it expressed the intention “to set up an official commission to study the question” of the women in the diaconate “especially regarding the earliest era of the church.” So yes, it can go over the early terrain. But going over the early terrain won’t bring much discussion because at some point you have to decide whether the women who were ordained then can also be sacramentally ordained today.

Video contains interview with Phyllis Zagano, courtesy of Religion & Ethics Newsweekly.

Q: So the commission’s work will have to pivot from the historical record to what is a prudential decision for the Catholic Church today?

A: Exactly. And I think that discussion will evolve in the more public realm — that the church today will make its views known as the commission’s work proceeds. And I think that’s very healthy, and very important.

I can’t make a blanket statement saying that a bishop in his diocese has to have women deacons. I have no right to say that. But I also have no understanding of the needs of the church in a certain diocese or in a certain national episcopal conference.

In the Americas it could be very well-received. In Canada or Australia or Ireland, the idea is very well-received there. But there are other cultures that I’m not so familiar with where it may not be as well-received. And I think that’s important for the church to learn. It would be up to the episcopal conferences to request women deacons, or to decide they wish to have women deacons. And then it would be up to each bishop to decide whether he will have women deacons. That’s the way it was in the early church.

Q: Will you give a recommendation to the pope to allow the ordination of women deacons?

A: I’ve written that the church should [do that]. Look, I don’t want to raise false hopes. To me, it is a ‘merely ecclesiastical law’ because women have been ordained as deacons in the past. But I can’t say what the commission will find; I don’t want to raise hopes one way or the other. I think the important thing is this is a discussion the whole church should undertake, and it will.

Q: Some argue that if there were women deacons in the early church they weren’t deacons in the sense we know them today.

A: Every place in the church had different practices and did different things. We can’t really cherry-pick here, there and everywhere. Were there women deacons who served as deacons? Yes. Were there women deacons who didn’t serve as deacons? Probably. Were there women deacons who were ordained? Yes. Were there women deacons who the bishops didn’t think they were ordaining? I don’t know, maybe.

Q: How are you feeling?

A: I’m kind of tired. I was going to go food shopping today.

About the author

David Gibson

David Gibson is a national reporter for RNS and an award-winning religion journalist, author and filmmaker. He has written several books on Catholic topics. His latest book is on biblical artifacts: "Finding Jesus: Faith. Fact. Forgery," which was also the basis of a popular CNN series.


Click here to post a comment

  • Why do they need a council to support: “New International Version

    A deacon must be faithful to his wife and must manage his children and his household well.” Not a lot of disparity in that. He must be a man, period.

  • Sandi, I generally agree with the positions you take on the Scriptures, but I think that the New Testament is clear that women may serve as Deaconesses if not as pastors, which is a discussion for another day. Deaconesses are typically, but not always, the wives of Deacons, aiding their husbands in the ministry assigned to them.

  • Thanks for this great interview David. It will help me remain practical in the midst of feeling sort of wildly hopeful :-).

  • Pray-tell, what does genitalia have to do with being a vessel of Love and Grace to others in the role of deacon? What part of St. Paul’s “no more male or female, no more slave or free, Jew or Greek . . . ” do you not understand about the New Creation?

  • The scripture you write is in reference to salvation – nothing more. As far as genitalia, I doubt that is the problem, but the socialization and roles of men and woman would more likely answer your question. Christ decided that women should not be in the role.

  • We’re living in the 21st century, where gender has little to do with occupational function. BOTH male and females can become expert at nurturing and healing–note the growth in male nurses.

    I really pity you folks you feel you have to defend traditional Catholic doctrine at all costs.

  • Theologian, university professor and author Rita Nakashima Brock had a great comment on the issue of male only clergy. She noticed that Jesus had many characteristics- generosity, kindness, intelligence, compassion, faithfulness, knowledge of the scriptures, literacy, etc. Dr. Brock thought it made sense that those things should be crucial to clergy. Yet, none of those qualities are the single most defining issue for clergy. Nope, it’s genitals. Dr. Brock said, “You don’t have to BE like Jesus. You just have to PEE like Jesus.”

    That would be much funnier if it was not true. How sad to be a denomination so known for sex and gender related issues.

  • Pope Francis: “We had heard that in the first centuries there were deaconesses. One could study this and one could make a commission … [The media] said: ‘The Church opens the door to deaconesses.’ Really? I was a bit annoyed because this is not telling the truth of things.” Apparently no one at RNS is capable of reporting the pope’s own words during his in-flight interview returning to Rome from Armenia.

  • And for best performance as a “Catholic theologian,” the award goes to…
    Life in the limelight for the ever so present heterodox.
    It be all about me.
    And surely, that IS what it is all about in the Roman Catholic Church these days.

  • That’s a rather broad claim! Lots of mainstream Protestant Christians agree with me! We took St. Paul’s admonition quite seriously: If we’re a new Creation in Christ, then race and gender doesn’t matter any longer. We’re fully equal as brothers and sisters. Of course if the old men in dresses were to embrace that, they would immediately lose about 90% of their power.