News Top Stories

US Jesuit groups release names of priests accused of abuse

All U.S.-based Jesuit provinces are releasing the names of clerics they say are credibly accused of child sex abuse. RNS illustration by Kit Doyle

(RNS) — All U.S.-based provinces of the Society of Jesus are releasing the names of clerics they say are credibly accused of child sex abuse, joining other Catholic institutions that are embracing increased transparency as they rush to respond to the resurgence of the Catholic sex abuse crisis.

The revelations are seen as an important step by the Society of Jesus, the Catholic church’s largest male religious order of priests, commonly referred to as Jesuits, which claims more than 16,000 members worldwide, including the pope. Although it does not represent the whole of Catholicism, the group is deeply influential both inside and outside the church: Jesuits operate or are affiliated with several U.S. colleges and universities, including Boston College, Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., and Santa Clara University in Northern California.

On Monday, the society’s Midwest province in the U.S. published the names of 65 priests it says have an “established allegation” of sexual abuse of children since 1955.

The accused priests were broken down into three categories: 37 accused of sexual abuse of a minor who were investigated while the Jesuit was living or against whom multiple established allegations were received after his death; 18 with a single established allegation received after his death; and 10 whose names have already been published in another place.

A post on the province’s website explained that officials consider an “established allegation” to be “based on the facts and circumstances where there is a reasonable certainty that the accusation is true and that the sexual abuse of a minor has occurred.”

The Very Rev. Brian G. Paulson, provincial of the Midwest province, said in a public letter his organization will conduct an additional investigation of its clergy records in 2019 with the help of Hillard Heintze, a Chicago-based investigative firm.

A map of the Jesuit provinces in the United States and Canada. Image courtesy of Jesuits.org

“The Midwest Jesuits take this step in the spirit of transparency and reconciliation,” Paulson wrote. “As we look back at our history, the failures of the Society of Jesus and the Church to protect those entrusted to its care fill our hearts with outrage, sorrow and shame. On behalf of the Midwest Jesuits, I apologize to victim-survivors and their families for the harm and suffering you have endured.”

The Maryland province, which stretches from southern New Jersey to Atlanta, also released a list Monday morning of 19 priests accused of child sexual abuse dating back to 1950.

The categories of accused clerics were slightly different in the Maryland province’s report. They comprised priests currently within the province or whose abuse took place in the province; priests who are deceased; and priests against whom an allegation “could not be fully investigated to determine credibility, but for which there is a reasonable possibility (semblance of truth) that the alleged offense occurred.”

The province noted 10 additional priests who have already been listed as accused by other groups but either operated within the Maryland province or were assigned there at some point.

Mike Gabriel, communications director for the Maryland province, said none of the priests listed is in active ministry. He said the province’s protocol is to remove a Jesuit from ministry permanently if an allegation of child sexual abuse is deemed credible by an internal review board. He added that the group used a third-party review board that included members of law enforcement to evaluate the investigations.

“We are deeply sorry for the harm we have caused to victims and their families,” read a statement from the province. “We also apologize for participating in the harm that abuse has done to our Church, a Church that we love and that preaches God’s care for all, especially the most vulnerable among us.”

The Maryland release was met with a mixture of praise and frustration by advocates for abuse survivors.

“We are glad that Jesuit officials are taking this first step towards transparency and healing,” read a statement from the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. Calling the release of names “crucial not only for the healing of survivors, but also to encourage victims who may be suffering in silence to come forward,” SNAP pointed out that the names had been kept secret for years. Today’s release, it said, “is long overdue and prompted only by pressure from prosecutors, parishioners and the public.”

SNAP then called on Jesuit officials to allow their clergy files to be investigated by law enforcement.

The Northeast province, which plans to merge with Maryland province by July 2020, provided a statement saying it intends to release its own list of names on Jan. 15, 2019.

“The USA Northeast Province of the Society of Jesus is diligently working to release a comprehensive list of Jesuits who have had a credible allegation of sexual abuse of a minor or vulnerable adult,” the statement read in part. “This is an important endeavor that requires full transparency and thorough scrutiny.”

News of the releases comes a little more than a week after two other Jesuit provinces published the names of more than 150 clergy with credible sexual abuse claims dating to the 1950s. The West province listed 111 men dating back to 1950, while the Central and Southern province cited 42 men beginning in 1955.

After the Northeast province releases its list, all U.S.-based Jesuit provinces will have published the names of priests they say are accused of sexual abuse.

“This is the right and moral thing to do. We need to be honest and transparent about our sins and crimes, and not simply because a district attorney or attorney general is forcing us to,” James Martin, a prominent Catholic author and Jesuit priest, told Religion News Service in an email. “As in the sacrament of confession, one confesses sins freely and completely, and not only those we are forced to confess. It is an essential step in the process of healing and reconciliation.”

The Jesuits now join at least 35 American Catholic dioceses that have released lists of priests since August they say are credibly accused of sexual abuse. The wave of revelations began shortly after the Pennsylvania attorney general unveiled a bombshell 1,300-page grand jury report detailing the alleged sexual abuse of more than 1,000 children in the state by hundreds of Catholic priests.

The trend is a dramatic turn for the American church. While some dioceses and archdioceses had previously posted such lists, others spent years arguing against doing so despite sustained outcry from advocates for survivors of abuse.

Catholic bishops debated the process of releasing lists during their fall conference in Baltimore in November, with some clerics suggesting dioceses should release names collectively as a group.

At that meeting, Bishop Robert Deeley of the Diocese of Portland, Maine, appeared to push back on the notion that clerics are unable to police their own. Asked at a press conference whether bishops should hand over their internal files to law enforcement for review, Deeley said, “I would not acknowledge that we turn it over because we’re not incapable of doing it ourselves.”

About the author

Jack Jenkins

Jack Jenkins is a national reporter for RNS based in Washington, covering U.S. Catholics and the intersection of religion and politics.

36 Comments

Click here to post a comment

  • And even with this I suspect we are still at only the tip of the iceberg that is the Catholic priest pedophile scandal.

    This problem is more and more being shown to be systematic and systemic — making the institution itself criminally involved.

    It’s not much of a theology if across the continent, and likely the world, those entrusted with its dissemination do not adhere to it.

  • The Jesuits appear to be in a meltdown.

    The younger Jesuits always seem to me (and to my wife and family) so “overly expressive” and weak, wanting to be liked, fussy in their appearance.

    Major issues of fragility here.

  • There is nothing beyond noting a small clique like Rembert Weakland and Theodore McCarrick to the extent they could permitted like individuals to be ordained that indicates the problem is or was systematic and systemic.

  • Back in the day (and we are talking almost 50 years ago in the Boston area), my wife and I knew a number of Jesuits and men studying to become Jesuits. They all appeared to be fine men, and we did not doubt their fidelity to their faith or their vows. We hope none of them turn up on the list scheduled for release in January.

  • After all the names are released, it is an important matter for someone to construct an analysis of the data set of abusers with respect to all their other ministry characteristics EXCEPT the abuse factor common to all of them. In other words, when the abusing was unknown and hidden, what did the MINISTRY from these particular individuals look like? What were their public personalities? What were their common preaching themes? Who in the parishes did they most appeal to as clergymen? Who liked them? Who didn’t? What “tells” of fraudulent behavior or conduct were these guys putting out for years or decades? If no one does that or even attempts to do that, then no progress will be made on avoiding future abusers.

  • A beginning. It is truly sad that it has taken this long, but it is important to see now. Lets see other orders of religious do the same thing.

  • Let me call attention to two books, totaling over 800 pages, by Spanish scholar Pepe Rodriguez on this worldwide long duration matter: The Sex Life of the Clergy (La vida sexual del clero, 1995) and Pederasty in the Catholic Church: Sexual Crimes of the Clergy Against Minors, A Drama Silenced and Covered up by the Bishops, 2003 (Pederastia en la iglesia catolica: delitos sexuales del clero contra menores, un drama silenciado y encubierto por los obispos, 2003). Both are available from Amazon, though only in Spanish. Rodriguez estimates that 60% of Spanish clergy are sexually active, though only about 7% are serious abusers of minors. — Edd Doerr

  • Outside law enforcement needs to get involved. As long as church officials can keep their crimes and cover ups secret, nothing will change and kids are still not safe within this system. The wrongdoers need to be exposed and held accountable.

    There needs to be a Grand Jury investigation with subpoena power done in every diocese and every religious order in every state like was done in Pennsylvania, so that the full truth can be exposed and church officials can be held accountable for enabling and covering up child sex crimes.

    Judy Jones, SNAP “Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests” 636-433-2511, [email protected]

  • This is like Mueller accepting Trump’s documentation that there was no Russian collusion.

    ” The Jesuit order, called the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus, has been accused of using its schools in remote villages and on
    reservations as dumping grounds for problem priests. ”

    ” The settlement between the more than 450 victims and the province also calls for a written apology to the victims and disclosure of documents to them….”

    ” The settlement is believed to be the Catholic Church’s third-largest in the sex abuse cases, behind the Los Angeles Diocese, which agreed to pay $660 million to 508 victims, and the San Diego Diocese, which agreed to pay $198 million to 144 victims…. ”
    http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42271040/ns/us_news-faith/t/jesuits-settle-northwest-sex-abuse-cases-million/#.XBsgGc1OmUk

  • I have that strange creepy feeling I sometimes get when on long nights of traveling I make the mistake of going into a rest stop rather than simply pulling off the highway and peeing over the guardrail. As you know too well, there are some oddballs that hang around rest areas. Got to get back on the road dude.

  • Hi
    It always seems to aggravate me that when we don’t like someone for some reason we accuse them of doing inappropriate actions
    which will lessen them in the eyes of others. We never have to prove it, just say it. It disgusts me.
    Oh, I’m sure we have homosexual and predators in our church as does every church, but people prefer to attack the Catholic Church,
    because it is so large and demanding for our goodness to retain our status. If we can’t have it our way, then I’ll do it my way anyway.

    Prove ‘the’ allegation first, before shouting it out.

ADVERTISEMENTs