Lab equipment for biomedical research. Photo courtesy of Creative Commons/Bill Dickinson

Choosing ethical medical treatments as the options narrow

(RNS ) — My path to the Egress from my brain cancer may be a bit shorter than I’d hoped even a few weeks ago. But I figure I can still complain about the way some human research makes me feel like a rat in a cage.

I’ve known a lot about the value of research in medicine. Even back when I was a college student, I knew more than a few people who used critters to test possibilities. I don’t have a moral objection to research on rats. But people as the target? I can still handle a “yikes.”

I’m a bit worse from glioblastoma than I was a month or so ago. I’d been told at the start that the median survival was about 15 months. Eight months after an operation that removed a large tumor in my brain, an MRI scan shows some of it has returned — about the size of a large grape, or 3 centimeters in diameter, on my left side.

My result looks to be a standard GBM median return and the tumor has probably grown even larger since that scan.  It’s usually fast. And I am searching hard and fast right now for one of the newest treatments that I might be able to take very soon.

My goals are simple enough that I can be very clear even as my mental powers have already slipped to some degree: I want a treatment that has the odds of making me live longer and better — but has odds against me feeling crummy just to keep living longer.

A research lab with cages of mice. Photo courtesy of Creative Commons/Marta Wincenciak

 This image is available for web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

And that is what’s made me think about mice. I’m not going to name researchers here. But a few of them remind me far too much of very good critter-aimed researchers. For them, the main questions are: Does a new experiment work on rats? Did the critters live longer? Was there any evidence of problems with the rats’ last days or weeks?

Those are great questions, I guess. I’ve seen reports of human data that had been set up from critter data. But I’ve noticed lots of animal data has never helped people.  I can still hope now. Maybe one will help me. Maybe.

Is that a morally acceptable goal for me? Would I pick something like that as a human or even a religious goal? Should I feel like any experiment is good enough for me? I won’t go that far. If that standard is a smidge selfish for me, I will not shift that way.

I know my brain is shifting in ways that are not positive. My ability to grab words is getting harder, though it’s harder when I am talking than when I’m writing.  My comprehension remains pretty much normal. I’ve been out riding on my wonderful three-wheel pedaling thing. I’m reluctant to even use the word “tricycle” because it’s a great alternative to a kid’s three-wheeler. It’s fun! Still!

But I’m getting tired fast. My left hand may be vibrating some. And my talking is clearly, to me, and others, not remotely as good as it had been a month ago. So I’m pushing as hard as I can with three top medical experts on GBM.

I’ll decide in a couple of weeks. I have some sense that my pressure on them may be more than most patients push. I’m going to talk to all three docs about what their early and limited data shows for every one of their treatments.

My decades of journalism abilities are sticking with me, so far. And so are my own moral and ethical goals.

I hope that I will stay with enough mental strength to make decisions. I’ve had detailed conversations with my wife if my mind loses too much power too fast. That she’s an RN is more than a small strength for me.  Marni has already read my columns and has spotted errors in my writing that I’ve been able to correct. So far. Sigh.

In any case, we both understand the practical, clinical and ethical implications that may affect my decisions. It will be tied to our standards for picking my continued treatments.

All humans are mortal. I will be mortal now sooner than later.

Either way, I have set the standards. Inshallah, my doctors will have something for me to try PDQ. And maybe my pushing will mean they will also match my own moral standards. We shall see. We shall see.

(Jeffrey Weiss writes the RNS column “My Way to the Egress.”  The views expressed in this opinion piece do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service)


  1. It has been fascinating to follow Jeff’s journey, and he has delineated it quite well, but I feel a bit morbid about eavesdropping on this very personal event, and yet I admire the fine clinical tone his musings take. My only disappointment as an interested observer is his studied disinterest in actively considering the potentialities that await him on the other side of the Egress.

  2. Perhaps Mr Weiss’ ” studied disinterest ” (in your opinion) is the culmination of long and considered reflection on ” ….the other side of the Egress. ”
    Perhaps Mr Weiss should reflect on your ” disappointment “.
    I have difficulty in taking your license – referring to him as ” Jeff “.

  3. Seems you have a lot of difficulty with Edward. I happen to agree with him and feel is comment is right on. This close to tomorrow for Jeff, he should be weighing his options. Edward is right on.

  4. No disrespect was intended to Mr. Weiss by the familiar diminutive used.

  5. Normally I’d agree on the unseemliness of encouraging a dying person to convert to one’s religion, and I think Mr. Weiss has done plenty of consideration about the other side. Here, however, Mr. Weiss has expressed in previous columns that he does not mind at all, in fact encourages, the well wishes of all people about his Egress. So I think he’d welcome Edward’s remarks. And I think he could not care less at this point about being called Jeff.

  6. My parents and both my brothers are deceased.
    I only wish I would have known of your insight into how someone’s last moments should be contemplated.
    Where have you been ?
    How come I haven’t heard of your ?
    Your insight would be nothing short of a miracle for those at death’s door !
    Please – you need to advertise your ” Gift ” – divinely inspired I’m sure.
    Peter Popoff, Robert Tilton and Mike Murdock are all Christian TV Royalty.
    You’d fit right in….

  7. I appeciate your use of the Arabic loaner word “inshallah.” This is an example of the evolution of English which has gone on forever. I think is a positive sign of our increasingly diverse society, and the positive contributions the Arabic speaking peoples have made to the world. May you find blessings on your journey, and a gentle Egress.

  8. You may differ with me, but we only have so many chances to be right with God, patrick. His are running out. God bless you

Leave a Comment